Skip to main content

Federal Trade Commission hits Qualcomm with a lawsuit over its licensing practices

Karlis Dambrans/Flickr
Qualcomm has been sued by the Federal Trade Commission for allegedly violating antitrust laws in the way that it licenses its patents and sells modems for smartphones and other similar devices.

So how exactly did Qualcomm allegedly do this? According to the FTC’s statement, Qualcomm uses its dominance in the smartphone industry to elbow out the competition. Manufacturers are then given a choice — either pay extra for the use of Qualcomm’s essential patents, or be faced with releasing a phone on a limited scale.

According to the lawsuit, Qualcomm maintains a “no license, no chips” policy, in which it refuses to sell smartphone chips to companies that don’t agree to its elevated royalty fees. That means companies are often forced to comply if they want to release a phone on a wide basis, as there are few semiconductor companies that can manufacture chips on the same scale as Qualcomm.

Qualcomm agreed to license its patents on a fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory basis because they’re considered essential to the industrywide standards, but it reportedly won’t license them to competitors at all, which is how it can overcharge phone makers.

The lawsuit also goes into detail about the relationship between Qualcomm and Apple. According to the FTC’s statement, Apple agreed not to use other companies’ tech for five years, and in exchange, Qualcomm paid back some of those high fees. That explains why Apple waited until this year to switch from Qualcomm modems to Intel modems.

So what happens next for Qualcomm? Well, the FTC is asking that the courts undo and prevent Qualcomm’s methods of competition. The lawsuit could be a pretty big issue for the company because while it’s known for building smartphone processors, it makes most of its money by licensing patents.

Editors' Recommendations

Christian de Looper
Christian’s interest in technology began as a child in Australia, when he stumbled upon a computer at a garage sale that he…
Intel to help rival Qualcomm build its Snapdragon processors
Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger.

Intel is staging a comeback. But rather than fend off competition from some of its bitter rivals, Intel is instead embracing Qualcomm to help it regain the silicon crown. As part of its efforts to regain leadership, Intel will be opening the doors of its fabs to manufacture processors for other companies, and the company announced that it had secured deals to make chips for Qualcomm and Amazon at its factories.

This means that Intel's foundries will be making chips for its rivals based on design from ARM, rather than the x86 architecture that's at the heart of its processors, like the 11th Gen Core CPUs. The plan, according to Intel, will help it regain its leadership in chip manufacturing by 2025 with five core technologies -- including RibbonFET, PowerVia, and Foveros enhancements -- that affect the way transistors are designed and interact with each other.

Read more
Qualcomm says it’s ready to compete with Apple’s M1 chips
A Snapdragon 7C processor held between fingers.

Qualcomm, best known for designing chips inside many Android devices, is setting its sights on a different market: Laptops. In his first interview since becoming president and CEO of Qualcomm, Cristiano Amon says he believes that Qualcomm can have the best laptop chip on the market. And there's no one better to design that chip than a team of architects who have worked on chips at Apple.

A new interview from Reuters shows a confidant Qualcomm looking to expand its business. Although Qualcomm creates the chips that power many Android handsets, the company used to license the core blueprint from chip designer ARM. Now, the company designs its own mobile cores. It's also investing in its own laptop designs thanks to a $1.4 billion acquisition of startup Nuvia.

Read more
FTC hits Juul, Altria with antitrust lawsuit over $12.8 billion deal
Man smokes e-cigarette

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is suing tobacco giant Altria and e-cigarette powerhouse Juul to undo a $12.8 billion deal that allegedly violated federal antitrust laws.

The FTC alleges that Altria ducked out of the e-cigarette market in exchange for acquiring a 35% majority stake in Juul in 2018. Altria owns cigarette companies like Marlboro and Copenhagen. 

Read more