Skip to main content

Google: Microsoft revealed ‘highly confidential’ Android source code

Google Vs. Microsoft
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Google and Microsoft have long been at each other’s throats. And Wednesday, Google squeezed a little tighter, asking a judge with the US International Trade Commission to block a Microsoft expert witness in its lawsuit against Motorola for revealing “highly confidential source code” of its Android mobile operating system to the witness, reports Paid Content.

According to the motion filed with the ITC, Google requested that the court bar the expert, Dr. Robert Stevenson, from testifying on Microsoft’s behalf because Microsoft violated a confidentiality agreement between Microsoft, Motorola and Google when it revealed to Stevenson the source code.

“The protective order governing confidentiality in this investigation explicitly requires that Microsoft disclose to Google any consultant or expert seeking access to Google confidential business information or highly confidential source code before [Google’s emphasis] allowing a consultant or expert to review such information so that Google has an opportunity to object prior to disclosure,” Google’s statement read.

Google claims that Microsoft failed to give “prior written notice” to Google about passing along confidential information to Dr. Stevenson for testimony.

“The confidential source code improperly provided to Dr. Stevenson is highly proprietary source code that Google does not even share with its partners, such as Motorola,” Google said.

Microsoft is currently suing Motorola in an attempt to force them to pay royalties for patents it owns that are related to technology used in Android. Some companies, like HTC, have already agree to Microsoft’s demands. But Motorola has pushed back hard, and Google appears to be taking their back in the proxy-fight.

This move against Microsoft by Google follows the search giant’s public complaint that Microsoft, Apple, Oracle and others are purchasing a massive number of patents purely for the purpose of harming Google’s Android business.

Editors' Recommendations

Andrew Couts
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
This is how the Apple Watch needs to change in 2024
The Apple Watch Ultra 2 next to the original Apple Watch Ultra.

Apple Watch Ultra 2 (left) next to the Apple Watch Ultra Joe Maring / Digital Trends

2023 wasn’t a very exciting year for the Apple Watch. Sure, the Apple Watch Series 9 and Apple Watch Ultra 2 have a new S9 processor that allows for localized Siri and the Double Tap gesture, but otherwise, not much has changed. There were no new sensors or improvements to battery life, and the Ultra 2 is virtually identical to the first Apple Watch Ultra.

Read more
Your Google Pixel 8 Pro is about to get an incredible update
The Google Pixel 8 Pro laying face-down on a wood bench.

When Google introduced the Google Pixel 8 Pro earlier this year, the company made it clear that it was more of an AI phone than just a regular Android flagship. Now, Google is leaning more into that AI future with a pair of new features based on the in-house Gemini Nano model.

In order to bring Gemini Nano to the Pixel 8 Pro, Google built a new system called Android AI Core in Android 14. It’s the most compact and efficient AI model from Google, operating on Tensor mobile silicon natively. On-device operation means all processes happen locally, which ensures there’s little risk of sensitive information leaving your phone.

Read more
Reddit Recap 2023: how to find yours now
Reddit Recap 2023 on an iPhone.

Reddit Recap 2023 may not be as musically entertaining as Spotify Wrapped or as informative as Duolingo’s Year in Review, but it’s still worth checking out. This feature, available on the Reddit app every year, allows you to take a trip down memory lane and catch up on news and events that have been making headlines in your Reddit world since January.

Read more