Skip to main content

The 32GB iPhone 7 may perform worse than the 128GB and 256GB versions

When you’re upgrading to a new smartphone and decide to opt for the model with less storage, you do so knowing full well that you’re settling for fewer offline songs, shorter downloaded movies, and less apps in exchange for an extra Benjamin or two in your pocket. The last thing you’d expect that choice to impact is your phone’s responsiveness, though, but that appears to be the case with Apple’s iPhone 7.

In extensive, separate reviews by both Unbox Therapy’s Lew Hilsenteger and GSM Arena, the iPhone 32GB performed significantly worse than the 128GB and 256GB models. An investigation by New York-based Cellular Insights, meanwhile, found that some models of iPhone exhibited noticeably worse download and upload speeds than others.

Recommended Videos

Hilsenteger’s testing methodology principally involved using a free benchmarking suite for iOS devices to compare the read speeds, or the rate at which the handset parses data from the storage, and the write speeds, or the rate at which the handset records data to storage, between models of iPhone 7.

He found the read speeds of the 32GB iPhone 7’s storage comparable to those of the 128GB model, but the write speeds were a different story. In one test, Hilsenteger recorded a write rate of 42MB per second on the iPhone 7 and 341MB per second — eight times faster — on the iPhone 128GB.

GSM Arena corroborated those findings in tests of its own. In the results of benchmarks conducted with Basemark OS II, iPhone 7 models with larger amounts of storage performed much better than their low-capacity counterparts. The iPhone 7 32GB regularly failed to exceed the benchmarking suite’s 800-point threshold, in contrast to the 1,300-1,700 range that the 128GB iPhone 7 achieved.

And the synthetic results were reflected in real-world testing. Hilsteneger connected 32GB, 128GB, and 256GB models of iPhone 7 to a MacBook via USB cable and transferred the entirety of Star Wars — Episode IV: A New Hope between the two, comparing the amount of time it took to complete each transfer. In one particularly discouraging instance, the 32GB iPhone finished transmitting the 4.2GB file in three minutes and 40 seconds, while the 256GB iPhone took two minutes and 34 seconds — nearly a whole minute less.

The reason may be less conspiratorial than it appears. Modern smartphones, the iPhone 7 included, handle storage using solid-state technology — basically, electronic modules with non-moving parts. Unlike hard drives, which rely on mechanical arms to juggle data across a platter of spinning magnetic disks, SSDs use an embedded processor known as a controller to retrieve and store data from individual banks of memory known as NAND-based flash. That’s where size makes a difference: the comparatively generous real estate afforded by, say, a 128GB module allows manufacturers to arrange NAND in parallel, allowing the controller to access data much more efficiently than in the cramped configurations of smaller SSDs.

Write speeds don’t represent the only discrepancy between iPhone 7 models. Cellular Insights reported that certain variants of iPhone 7, specifically with the model numbers A1778 and A1784, performed “noticeably poorer” on 4G networks than those with model numbers A1660 and A1661. The former use Intel chips to manage wireless connectivity, while the latter rely on a competing solution from Qualcomm.

In the course of its testing, Cellular Insights found that the Intel iPhone 7 Plus models performed 30 percent worse, and sometimes as much as 75 percent worse, than the iPhone 7 Plus models with the Qualcomm chip in terms of download speeds, uploads speeds, and reception. “In all tests, the iPhone 7 Plus with the Qualcomm modem had a significant performance edge over the iPhone 7 Plus with the Intel modem,” Milan Milanović said. “We are not sure what was the main reason behind Apple’s decision to source two different modem suppliers for the newest iPhone.”

The implications are wide-reaching. The 32GB iPhone 7 costs $650, and larger configurations significantly more: the 128GB version and 256GB version retails for $750 and $850, respectively. And beyond storage capacity, there’s no obvious difference between them: the screen, components, and aesthetics are the same, and Apple doesn’t denote network or write speed differences between them in marketing materials.

The storage issue is easy enough to avoid by simply buying an iPhone 7 with less than 128GB in capacity, but the networking hardware’s another story: the Intel iPhone 7 Plus is primarily sold in the U.K. and Europe, while the Qualcomm models dominate the U.S. We’ve reached out to Apple for comment.

Kyle Wiggers
Kyle Wiggers is a writer, Web designer, and podcaster with an acute interest in all things tech. When not reviewing gadgets…
This one iPadOS 26 feature has me excited for the iPhone Fold
Semi-open state of a foldable iPhone concept

Samsung is set to launch the seventh generation of its Galaxy Z Fold book-style folding phone this Summer, but its biggest rival is yet to show its folding phone hand. Apple has long been expected to unveil an iPhone Fold, and the latest rumors suggest that it will launch next year.

I’ve used almost every folding phone released globally, with some exceptions for extremely obscure ones. While I've always been curious what an iPhone Fold would look like, I was fairly certain that Apple shouldn't build it, as I wasn’t sure they could deliver on one necessary feature.

Read more
Will my iPhone get iOS 26? Here’s every supported model
We've got the full list of iOS 26 supported devices - find out if you're getting the new iPhone update
iOS 26 features on a series of iPhone screens

Apple announced iOS 26 at WWDC 2025, and the new iPhone update comes with a fresh new 'Liquid Glass' look and plenty of features - and there are loads of iOS 26 supported devices, which is great news.

And no, you haven't missed a volley of updates since iOS 18 in 2024. Apple has skipped a bunch of numbers, so instead of giving us iOS 19 in 2025, we got iOS 26 alongside iPadOS 26, macOS 26, watchOS 26 and tvOS 26. In short, Apple's brought its operating system numbering into line. Nice.

Read more
iPhone 17 price looks more certain to rise for first time since the iPhone 12
Apple might be preparing its first iPhone price increase in five years
iPhone 16 Pro Max next to the 16 Plus, 16 Pro and regular iPhone 16

For years now, Apple has launched the base model iPhone at $799 - but in 2025, more and more signs are pointing towards prices being increased for the introduction of the iPhone 17.

The likelihood of an iPhone 17 price increase was raised by the Wall Street Journal in May, and now Counterpoint Research notes in its recent 2025 shipment forecast that "cost increases are expected to be passed on to consumers" by not only Apple, but Samsung as well.

Read more