Skip to main content

Kodak wins crucial round with ITC against Apple, RIM

kodak_logoLast month, Kodak lost ground in its patent infringement suit accusing Apple and RIM smartphone cameras of using its technology. Today, the ITC decided it will review that decision and gave Kodak an important victory in the case that could see the company an incredible increase in its licensing revenue, according to Bloomberg.

The case dates back to January 2010, when Kodak accused the smartphone-makers of using technology related to previewing moving images in low resolution while recording high-res stills. The ITC soon after began an investigation, and determined in January of this year that Apple and RIM were not guilty. But things are looking up now that the ITC will review the earlier finding, leaving Kodak to sit back and until for a final verdict, which is due by May 23. And what will it mean to Kodak if it’s able to come away with the win? Billions. According to Bloomberg’s report, Kodak could rake in an extra $1 billion in newly added licensing fees off the patented technology.

It isn’t the first time Kodak has sued and won for the smartphone feature. In 2009, the veteran camera company took Samsung to court for patents regarding image compression, data storage, image preview, and image capture, which the manufacturer’s phones featured. But unlike the more recent legal drama, Samsung opted to settle out of court for a reported $964 million.

Kodak’s market value has struggled in recent years. It’s less of a big name in the digital camera world and obviously its print film business has taken a beating. But money from patent litigation has been its saving grace, raking in $838 million for the company. And the money doesn’t stop there: Kodak “expects to average $250 million to $350 million in annual revenue from intellectual property licensing through 2013. That figure doesn’t include potential Apple and RIM royalties.”

So it appears that Kodak may be able to coast on its patent lawsuits without spending much to manufacturer new devices, a habit tech companies have seemingly been relying on. That said, it’s hard to accuse the little guy (in this situation) of taking big names like RIM, Samsung, and Apple to court for profiting off its own ideas. Still, patent litigation in the industry is setting a dangerous precedent – and we’re likely only seeing the beginning of it.

Molly McHugh
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
This AI gadget let me speak in languages I don’t know or understand
Timekettle AI interpreter hub held in hand.

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy declares the "Babel" fish to be "probably the oddest thing in the Universe." It's described as a "leech-like" fish that fits into your ear, feeds off of the brainwaves in the surroundings, and then defecates inside your ear to produce sounds in a language that you understand. Effectively, it is a very gross and flagrant, but extremely sophisticated device for real-time translation.

Nearly half a century after Douglas Adams wrote the mind-bending and earth-shatteringly (literally) convulsive saga, the concept of a Babel fish still feels highly spellbinding. While we are still not so close to the brainwave-to-defecations level of immediate translations, a bunch of gadgets are chasing that problem in a much less disgusting way. Google's Interpreter mode and Samsung's Galaxy AI are prime examples of translation technologies that are readily available, but a few brands want to tackle the issue separately from the smartphone. Timekettle is one of those brands, and its latest X1 Interpreter hub is a handheld device that claims to do it differently (read: better) using AI.

Read more
Apple Music vs. Spotify: Which music streaming service is the best?
An iPhone with the Home section of the Spotify app on it.

When it comes to music-streaming platforms, two of the most renowned options are Spotify and Apple Music. Both services utilize sleek and intuitive user interfaces, while introducing plenty of features and enormous music libraries. You’ll also be able to enjoy Spotify or Apple Music on several different device types, including smartphones, tablets, laptops, smart TVs, and vehicle infotainment systems. But we bet you’re wondering: which of these two music must-haves is the real must-have?

To help you decide, we’ve put together this comparison of Spotify and Apple Music, focusing on criteria like price, features, and compatibility. We’ve picked a winner for each category, as well as an overall winner, which we present at the very end.

Read more
How to get Android apps on a Chromebook
Dell Chromebook 3189 2-in-1 on a classroom desk floating in the air.

Over the last few years, Android apps have been added to more and more Chromebook models. A brilliant expansion of the overall user experience, Google went ahead and integrated the Play Store into most Chromebooks made after 2019. This is the most convenient way to download an Android app or two, but if you own an older Chromebook, the machine may not have native support for downloading and installing applets.

To confirm this, we recommend referencing this extensive Android app support list from The Chromium Projects.

Read more