Skip to main content

Report: Digital assistants held back by poor microphone technology

microphone technology virtual assistants d1 siri voice control
Philips
Frustrated that Cortana, Google Now, or Siri just don’t seem to understand you? It might not be their fault, but the microphones within the phones themselves, a new report claims. The comments come from IHS Markit analyst Marwan Boustany, who told Bloomberg Thursday that microphone technology hasn’t advanced much since the launch of Siri.

The problems lie in the lack of progress in not being able to filter out background noise or focusing on far-away voices. We’ve become conditioned to work around these issues, though: How often do you see someone holding the phone up to their mouth when trying to ask Siri or Google Now a question, or catch yourself doing the same thing? Quite often, probably.

There’s not much Apple, Microsoft, or Google can do on their own to fix this. According to Bloomberg, these companies are now pressuring microphone manufacturers to improve their software and hardware to improve voice recognition.

Among the demands are for a higher signal-to-noise ratio, where the mic can isolate voices better and without the need to hold the device close, and a higher acoustic overload point, which is the point where a microphone can no longer distinguish a signal from background noise. This must be done in the same real estate as current mics, given manufacturers are already struggling to fit all the components into ever-shrinking devices.

While waiting for mic manufacturers to act, device manufacturers have turned to adding more mics in an attempt to overcome the shortcomings of current technologies. It’s not always effective in fixing the issue, and in turn can become a greater drain on battery. This is especially true considering most AI’s now are always listening for commands from the user, i.e. “Hey Siri.”

While some microphone manufacturers have turned to software in an attempt to fix the problem, a few are experimenting with entirely new designs such as newer manufacturer Vesper. That company is using piezoelectric technology, which it removes the static plate found in current designs — which often loses sensitivity over time — and should result in a better mic that also is a good deal more sensitive.

In any case, these new mic technologies will not be ready until at least mid-2017. That means for most popular phones, better microphones are not on the horizon for at least one, if not two, generations. Until then, you’ll still be greeted with that annoying phrase, “Sorry, I didn’t quite get that.”

Editors' Recommendations

Ed Oswald
For fifteen years, Ed has written about the latest and greatest in gadgets and technology trends. At Digital Trends, he's…
The results are in: Alexa is legitimately dumber than Siri and Google Assistant
upgraded ecovacs deebot ozmo models vacuum and mop with multi floor mapping 920 08  2 1

The venture capital firm recently asked Amazon Alexa, Apple's Siri, and Google Assistant the same 800 questions. Google Assistant was the most successful of the bunch and was able to answer 93% of the questions correctly. In comparison, Siri was only able to get 83% of the questions right, and Alexa got 80%. Samsung's Bixby and Microsoft's Cortana, both lesser-used voice assistants, didn't even make the cut. 
That said, the results for all three represented an improvement over where they were a year ago. Loup Ventures performed the same test last year and found that Google Assistant was only able to get 86% of the questions correct, Siri scored 79%, and Alexa only got 61% right.
The smart assistants were judged on both whether or not they understood the question being asked correctly as well as whether or not it delivered a correct response.
Questions were broken into five categories:
• Local – Where is the nearest coffee shop?
• Commerce – Order me more paper towels.
• Navigation – How do I get to Uptown on the bus?
• Information – Who do the Twins play tonight?
• Command – Remind me to call Jerome at 2 pm today.
This year’s test was done with Siri using iOs 12.4, Google Assistant on a Pixel XL running Android 9 Pie, and Alexa via its iOS app.
The only area where Google Assistant trailed behind the competition was in the Command category. Siri was able to handle phone functions like calling, adding things to your calendar, and email better than any of the other apps. And while one might presume Alexa would win when it came to commerce questions, Google Assistant proved to be the most useful in that regard and was able to answer questions about product and service information, as well as help find where to buy products, more quickly than the others.
Despite all three assistants missing the mark in some categories, overall Loup Ventures says that the rate of improvement for the assistants continues to be impressive.
Each platform has seen dramatic improvements since the company started tracking them, which suggests that we’ll also see some significant improvements across the board over the next six months before the company tests them again.

Read more
Apple’s new Seattle campus may mean big things for Siri, artificial intelligence
Tim Cook WWDC 2019

It sure looks like Apple has big plans for Siri.

Apple plans to hire 2,000 more employees for a new Seattle campus, the company announced Monday. A significant number of those jobs look like they're focused on improving Siri and developing more advanced artificial intelligence.

Read more
A new survey by Adobe shows an evolving market for voice applications
voice assistants arent ready assistant mem2

Surveys are rarely a perfect distillation of technology’s role in society but a new survey conducted by Adobe Analytics does contain some revelatory clues about voice-controlled devices and applications that could prove quite useful to developers and manufacturers of these products.

The methodology of Adobe’s surveys is pretty straightforward for these kinds of reports: They query more than 1,000 U.S. consumers, all of whom are required to have at least one digital device (read: smartphone or tablet) and be over the age of 18. The survey uncovered five top findings, and the data that inspired those findings is pretty interesting as well.

Read more