Skip to main content

Rhapsody Spins Free, Lowers Subscription Fees

Subscription music service Rhapsody has finally completed the process of spinning loose of its dual corporate parents, RealNetworks and Viacom. As part of the celebration, Rhapsody has rolled out a new logo…but potential customers are probably more interested in Rhapsody’s new pricing: $10 per month for Rhapsody Premiere, an all-you-can-handle music streaming to PCs, home audio systems, or (single) mobile device that can handle it.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

The new monthly pricing represents a one-third price cut: Rhapsody had been charging $14.99 per month for its Rhapsody To Go plan, which enabled subscribers to tap in from both home audio systems as wel as mobile applications and selected MP3 players. Rhapsody Online was $12.99, and offered access only from PCs and home audio systems. The new $10/month Rhapsody Premiere plan will apparently work with a single mobile device; subscribers on the $15 Rhapsody To Go plan will (which supports multiple mobile devices) will be kept on that plan unless they specifically switch.

Rhapsody is among the most successful of the online streaming music services: it launched all the way back in 2001, and currently has an estimated user base of around 700,000 users along with a wide range of device support from players like Sonos, plus the company has unveiled mobile clients for the iPhone and Android. However, subscription music services have yet to develop the market traction of the download-to-own model exemplified by Apple’s iTunes Music Store: so far, music lovers seem to want to be able to purchase tracks and have them forever, rather than pay a month fee for online access to a library of millions of tracks.

The newly independent Rhapsody is headed up by John Irwin, and says it believes it can be profitable by the end of the 2010 calendar year. However, the service does face challenges: when it launched its iPhone application back in September, it got a surge of interest from iPhone users, but comparatively few stayed with the service after the free one-week trial.

Rhapsody may also face a direct challenge from Apple in the near future: industry watchers speculate Apple’s acquisition of Lala.com in December 2009 means the Cupertino company is working on its own cloud-based music service.

Editors' Recommendations

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
How to manage and cancel subscriptions on an iPhone, iPad, or Apple Watch
iPhone XS Max

If you've recently bought one of the best iPhones, you may think you're done paying, but with all of the subscription services and apps on the iPhone you're really not done yet. That's okay, and it is certainly great to experiment with new products and services on your phone. But what about when you get tired of them, or you've watched all of the best shows on Apple TV+? It's time to cancel time to cancel all of your un- or underused subscriptions on your iPhone!

Read more
Look who just replaced Samsung as king of the global smartphone market
The Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra's cameras.

Samsung has been sitting pretty at the top of the global smartphone market for more than a decade. Until now, that is.

Data released this week by research firm IDC shows that the Korean tech giant has been knocked off its perch by archrival Apple thanks in part to robust sales of the iPhone.

Read more
You’re all wrong — 60Hz on the iPhone is fine
A video playing on the Apple iPhone 15 Plus.

The iPhone 15 launch feels like it was just yesterday, but rumors of the iPhone 16 are already floating around. Some of the most recent have been bad news for enthusiasts, as it seems Apple is happy to stick with one of the more controversial elements of the iPhone 15: a 60Hz refresh rate.

While some people have dismissed this as tech-bubble griping that no one in the actual public cares about, there's definitely some fire to go with all this smoke. A 60Hz refresh rate, while not criminal, is starting to look increasingly comical on Apple's $799-plus smartphones. After all, almost every single Android smartphone priced at more than $500 now has a 90Hz or even 120Hz display — so why are two of Apple's best smartphones languishing with objectively worse screen tech?

Read more