Skip to main content

Another day, another ho-hum announcement from Apple

The new Apple iPad Pro and iPhone SE announced at an Apple three-ring circus-event on Monday sound like solid products, and both are likely to sell in the tens of millions – a success by any measure. So why is everyone so meh about Apple?

Hands-on reports and analysis published across the Web following Tim Cook’s big unveiling reveal a pretty consistent theme. The experts have spoken. And they aren’t saying “insanely great.”

They’re saying, “boring.”

Recommended Videos

“The Apple iPhone SE event showed that…(yawn)…the future is…zzzzzzzzz,” wrote Chris O’Brien at VentureBeat. “You know you’re at an Apple event when the audience applauds raucously after the person on stage announces…woven nylon watch bands.”

They’re great. No, really

Reviewers from fan sites and tech hubs alike struggled with wording in their brief, hands-on encounters with the new products. Although the new iPad and iPhone are guaranteed to sell millions of units, they are largely somewhat improved versions of exactly what the company already makes and sells.

MacWorld’s Jason Snell seemed nonplussed by the new phone, for example: “The iPhone SE comes in the Rose Gold color option never offered on the iPhone 5S, but otherwise these two phones are identical cousins. If you upgraded your iPhone 5S to the same color iPhone SE, nobody but the most attentive Apple aficionado would ever know.” He called it “2012 all over again.”

The Apple iPhone SE event showed that…(yawn)…the future is…zzzzzzzzz.

The new iPad? Reviews are decidedly meh. Yes, it’s smaller, meaning the keyboard is cramped. There’s a new hump to cover a bigger camera. The components are upgraded. Yawn. Ars Technica’s Andrew Cunningham offered this backhanded compliment: “They might not be ‘exciting,’ but they both seem like great upgrades.”

In an article titled “Apple Watch is now $299 and still not worth it,” Gizmodo’s Michael Nunez is more clearly disappointed. “Unfortunately, the geniuses at Apple have not found a way to add any meaningful updates to the overpriced wearable device. In a rather desperate attempt to gain some attention, the company (briefly) announced several new nylon watch bands (yay!) and a small reduction in price.”

Engadget released a video summing up various editors’ opinions on the new devices. Listen closely. You can almost hear them hemming and hawing.

“I think all the devices look pretty good – maybe they’re not for everybody necessarily,” noted Nathan Ingraham.

return-of-the-4-inch-iphone-970x647-c
Image used with permission by copyright holder

“I wouldn’t go so far as to say I dislike this about Apple’s new 9.7-inch iPad Pro … I just am not clear on Apple’s messaging,” said Dana Wollman.

“I’m not sure what the market is for this new iPad Pro,” said Devindra Hardawar.

Richard Windsor, an analyst with Radio Free Mobile, summed it up as a small event to refresh the older end of its offering.

‘This was a housekeeping event for Apple where it updated parts of its offering that were a little tired as well as picking up a few loose ends. It was not an event that will have everyone scurrying off to their spreadsheets to increase their estimates. Consequently, the main issue that besets Apple remains its lack of growth.”

So wait, that’s it?

Overall, it wasn’t exactly the exhilarated response you might expect when the most important company in the world releases new versions of its most important products.

I detect an undercurrent of ‘That’s it?’ in the collective response to today’s event.

“I detect an undercurrent of ‘That’s it?’ in the collective response to today’s event, but I’m not sure what Apple could have done differently,” wrote Apple defender John Gruber at his blog, Daring Fireball. Gruber argued that the event was held in a smaller location as Apple’s way of mitigating expectations; because of the location, we shouldn’t expect to be dazzled by the new products. Wait, what? Why hold an event if the company holding it thinks the products don’t merit an event?

That’s not me talking, of course, that’s Mashable Editor at Large Lance Ulanoff:

“It is only with the distance of a day that you can see each event for what it is. Sometimes you realize that the products Apple unveiled and announcements it made are even bigger than you originally thought. You may even discover some critical thing you missed. Other times, you realize that, overall, this was not that big of a deal. Monday’s launch falls into the latter camp.”

And the actual products, Lance? “These devices are, for the most part, rehashes of previous innovations.”

ipad-pro-9-7in_idea_sketch_large-640x427-c
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Sure, many people took this as yet another occasion to praise Apple, and there were a few gems hidden in the hardware. Re/Code’s Ina Fried found the one true improvement hiding in the announcements, a technology in the iPad: a way to mimic SIM cards that will let customers choose from carriers when travelling abroad.

“The new iPad packs both the built-in electronic equivalent of a SIM card as well as a traditional card slot that consumers can use to add additional carrier options beyond those supported by Apple,” she wrote. “Of course, it’s worth remembering that not all iPads are capable of connecting to cellphone networks. Apple charges an extra $130 for cellular versions of the iPad, compared to the Wi-Fi-only models,” she added.

Reality, finally without distortion

In his wonderful biography of Steve Jobs, Walter Isaacson writes about the incredibly powerful effect of being in Steve Jobs’ presence, which transformed reality — and helped turn ordinary press events into memorable ones.

I wouldn’t go so far as to say I dislike … Apple’s new 9.7-inch iPad Pro.

“The best way to describe the situation is a term from Star Trek,” explained Andy Hertzfeld, who was on the original Mac development team back in the 80s. “Steve has a reality distortion field…in his presence, reality is malleable. He can convince anyone of practically anything.”

That helped propel earlier products, and the halo effect of Apple events has largely continued following the death of Jobs. But is that field finally shutting off? Even The Verge, which has been lambasted as iVerge for what is perceived as a pro-Apple slant in its coverage, picked up on the blasé.

In his hands-on review of the device, for example, Dieter Bohn really couldn’t find anything of interest to talk about.

“Well, it’s a small phone,” he begins. “Apart from the new rose gold color, it’s almost completely indistinguishable from the iPhone 5 or (now-discontinued) 5S…. there’s not much more to say: this looks like an iPhone — and people who want that smaller size are going to really like it.”

Really selling it, huh?

The Verge has made efforts recently to distance itself from that iVerge moniker; in December, Nick Statt wrote an essay describing Apple’s recent design efforts as “unapologetically bad.” He described a new battery case from Apple as “another misfire from the company often lauded for its revelatory design and just the latest instance in a series of confounding Apple hardware decisions.”

The event was also notable for what wasn’t present, wrote Digital Trends computing editor Matt Smith. Is Apple giving up on the Mac?

“Another event has passed, and the Mac continues to be ignored. No one was expecting to see anything new today, but that’s the point. Apple’s Macs — the MacBook Air and Pro, in particular — are becoming outdated, bloated, overpriced machines, and it’s a damned shame.”

In the end, reviews will laud the new products, as always. We gave the iPhone 6S an Editors’ Choice, and customers will likely flock to the iPhone SE. Let’s give Engadget’s Dana Wollman the last word:

“I’m not going to pretend this is as important as the U.S. restoring diplomatic relations with Cuba … Apple announced some things. It was a busy day. We survived. We will review the things. You will probably like the things. You will probably buy the things. And then we’ll do it again in June.”

Jeremy Kaplan
As Editor in Chief, Jeremy Kaplan transformed Digital Trends from a niche publisher into one of the fastest growing…
Five reasons I’m excited for the new Google Pixel 9a
Person holds Pixel 9a in hand while sitting in a car.

Google has consistently ranked among the best smartphones for its affordable devices over the past six years, particularly with its Pixel A series. The Pixel 3a set the trend for major phone manufacturers to provide a compelling experience at half the price of flagship models, intensifying competition in this segment.

In the last three months, we’ve seen Samsung introduce the Galaxy A56 and Galaxy A36, which deliver features from the Galaxy S25 series at a significantly lower price point. Then there’s Apple, which entered the market with the iPhone 16e, priced considerably higher than its rivals. Additionally, Nothing offers the Nothing Phone 3a and Phone 3a Pro, arguably the best phones available at $379 and $459, respectively.

Read more
Apple might serve a massive front camera upgrade on iPhone 17
An iPhone 16 laying on a shelf with its screen on.

The domain of Apple leaks is currently obsessed with the controversial iPhone 17 Pro design refresh, which could stir some heated debate with its massive camera hump. A lot of chatter is also focused on the svelte iPhone 17 Air. Yet, it seems there are a few other internal upgrades worth getting excited about.
According to analyst Jeff Pu, Apple will equip all four iPhone 17 series models with an upgraded 24-megapixel front camera. So far, Apple has stuck with a 12-megapixel selfie snapper on its mainline iPhones. Moreover, the company hasn’t ever deployed a 24-megapixel camera sensor, keeping its experiments limited to 12-megapixel and 48-megapixel units in the past few years.
The research note by Pu, which was seen by MacRumors and 9to5Mac, doesn’t go into details about the specifications or feature details of the new 24-megapixel front snapper on the iPhone 17 series. However, we can take an educated guess, based on what Apple accomplished when it switched from 12-megapixel to 48-megapixel rear cameras.

A 24-megapixel sensor will most likely default to pixel-binning for delivering pictures and videos at a lower resolution than the native pixel count. Pixel-binning essentially combines the light data collected by adjacent pixels, creating what is colloquially known as a super-pixel.
The sum total of these efforts are pictures that are more detailed and with more realistic color rendering, especially in low-light scenarios. Depending on how the pixels are combined, the final image is usually a lower-resolution shot, but more pleasing to look at.
For example, the iPhone 16 Pro’s 48-megapixel main camera does 4-in-1 pixel binning to produce 12-megapixel pictures, but you can still stick full-res 48-megapixel shots, too. There’s also an intermediary option to to get the best of both worlds with 24-megapixel clicks.
With a 24-megapixel selfie camera coming into the picture, iPhone 17 buyers can expect improved selfies and better-quality video calls. Moreover, since there are more pixels to collect light data, Apple might leverage it to offer more advanced camera features, too.

Read more
Apple’s rumored foldable could be the most expensive iPhone by far
Concept render of a foldable iPhone.

If you're waiting on Apple's rumored foldable iPhone, start saving your pennies. And nickles, dimes, and quarters, too. Analyst Tim Long told Barclays the first foldable iPhone could start in the $2,300 range, which would make it nearly double the price of the current most expensive iPhone (the iPhone 16 Pro Max) and one of the single priciest handsets on the market.

This announcement follows rumors that the foldable iPhone will enter mass production sometime in 2026 or 2027 and lines up with what tipster Ming-Chi Kuo predicted for the price. That said, the rumored handset has gained a lot of attention from iPhone fans. The expected demand for the iPhone foldable is great enough that even the higher price tag might not hurt sales.

Read more