Skip to main content

Don’t expect amazing designs from Samsung, says former head of product strategy

Samsung’s corporate nature is holding it back according to Kevin Lee, former head of product strategy and user experience at Samsung Design America, who has spoken at length about what he believes is stopping the Korean firm from releasing unique, exceptionally designed hardware.

Samsung has long been accused of releasing rehashed, safely designed, and sometimes even dull-looking smartphones, but it’s not because it doesn’t get presented with great ideas, says Lee. “I’ve seen some amazing concepts and prototypes. It was like, ‘Wow, if only we had that in the market, the rest of the market would go bankrupt.’”

Recommended Videos

Related: How Yves Behar worked with Samsung to design its TVs

Please enable Javascript to view this content

Why aren’t they on sale? “It’s a combination of problems – cultural, managerial, and structural – that prevented concepts from making it to market as real Samsung products,” he told fastcodesign.com in an interview. Lee talks about complex management structures, and a need for managers to justify profitability on a project before it goes ahead. The wide range of products in a line means costs are carefully calculated, and this can stifle creativity.

The founder of NewDealDesign also talks about his experiences working with Samsung, calling it frustrating, because he “felt like I was giving crown jewels to people who wouldn’t produce them.” According to the interviewees, working with companies based in the U.S. or Europe is very different, where designers wield more power, and their ideas have a better chance of reaching production. Samsung’s corporate structure makes such decisions difficult.

Lee says Samsung’s not going to take a $10 million risk on a “bold, unproven” product, because it has a better chance of predicting the financial returns from releasing a revised model with a selection of new features. Worryingly, he doesn’t see this changing any time soon, despite the appointment of a new, and high-profile, global head of design.

Samsung has had a difficult time recently, with falling profits and indifference rather than excitement towards its flagship smartphones. The Galaxy S6, which is expected at Mobile World Congress next month, needs to change all that. But anyone hoping for an exciting new design may be in for a disappointment if Lee’s words are anything to go by.

Andy Boxall
Andy is a Senior Writer at Digital Trends, where he concentrates on mobile technology, a subject he has written about for…
Learn from my mistakes: Don’t settle for a cheap tablet like the Nokia T20
Screens on the iPad Pro and Nokia T20 tablets.

The Nokia T20 has prompted a tablet epiphany. I have owned many different tablets over the years, with my lifestyle fitting the functionality they offer. Still, unfortunately, most of them have quickly been discarded due to never living up to expectations or failing to keep up with my usage. All except for the Apple iPad, that is. I’ve owned several generations, and none have been hidden away in the "tech drawer of doom."

Over the last few weeks, I’ve been using the Nokia T20 tablet, and it has finally brought about that epiphany. I've refused to believe it for ages, but I now can safely say that if you want a tablet, it’s absolutely worth paying more to get an iPad.
So many tablets
I don’t know what it is about the tablet in general. Maybe it’s because it can seem more frivolous than a smartphone, but I have often thought I should be able to buy a cheapish one and have it to satisfy my relatively basic needs. Over the years, I have used, purchased, or reviewed tablets made by Samsung, Huawei, Xiaomi, Lenovo, Amazon, and a few others. The ones I’ve bought personally have been cheaper models, usually spotted in a sale, but absolutely none of them are in use today. Poor software, substandard screens, and creaky performance almost immediately put me off, and after using them for a bit, they’d get retired.

Read more
Tech companies still don’t understand watch design
Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2

Here’s a non-news flash: A watch -- any watch -- has to be designed and styled in an attractive, comfortable way for me to want to wear it. If it either looks like it was penned by a 5-year-old or has the same level of comfort as wrapping barbed wire around my wrist, no amount of functionality will convince me to put it on.

It seems so bizarre to still be saying this, yet we’re more than eight years into the “modern” smartwatch revolution, and still there are only a handful of models I want to wear on a regular basis. Why is it taking so long for tech companies to understand how to consistently make a desirable smartwatch?
Where did it all go wrong?
If smartwatch design wasn’t so tragic most of the time, it would be highly amusing. In our 2014 review of the LG G Watch -- a foul pustule of a wearable -- our Mobile editor at the time wrote:

Read more
I have the Galaxy S21 and Galaxy S20 FE and I don’t care about the plastic backs
samsung galaxy s21 plastic back is fine s20 fe

The Samsung Galaxy S21 was announced a while ago now, and pre-orders for the phone have officially ended, meaning customers are finally getting their hands on the device. All the reviews are in too, with the vast majority of them praising the phone for its stunning new design, beautiful display, and excellent performance. But there's one aspect of the phone that some might still be unsure about -- the plastic back.

When the device was released, I asked the question: Are we okay with the Galaxy S21 being made of plastic? Now, after having used it for a while, I have an answer. Yeah, I'm kind of fine with it.
Premium plastic?
Let's be clear -- most of the arguments against Samsung using plastic on devices like the Galaxy S20 FE and Galaxy S21 have less to do with real-world look and feel, and more to do with the very idea that plastic is involved.

Read more