Skip to main content

App subscription fatigue is quickly ruining my smartphone

When I first got an iPhone in 2008, I remember checking out web apps, which were basically websites that I would keep bookmarked on the home screen. Every time I opened them up, they somehow didn’t look like I just launched mobile Safari. Eventually, Apple launched the App Store in July 2008, mostly eliminating the need for antiquated web apps.

Since the App Store opened up, we’ve gotten to see innovative new apps and games that took our iPhones to a completely new level — showing us what our devices were capable of. I was excited to see and hear about new apps for a variety of things, from task managers to camera replacement apps to photo editors to journals and so much more. Games were also making use of the iPhone’s accelerometer and gyroscope sensors, so it wasn’t just always about touchscreen controls.

App Folders on the iPhone 14 Pro in iOS 16.
Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

Back then, you could easily find “lite” versions of apps and games that allowed you to try them out before you even considered the full version. A lot of titles had a price tag ranging from $1 to $5 or more, depending on what the developer thought their work was worth (remember the “I Am Rich” app that cost $1,000 to show you could afford it?).

Recommended Videos

If you take a look at the App Store nowadays, you’ll find most apps and games are “free,” but the moment you open them, they’ll pester you with a subscription model of some kind. It’s something that litters countless apps in 2022. I’m so over the subscription-based business model, and I know I’m not the only one.

Let me pay once for an app and be done with it

Game library installed on the iPhone 14 Pro
Nadeem Sarwar / DigitalTrends

If you take a look at the App Store or Google Play, you will find endless free apps and games to choose from. And I’ll admit, there have been a lot of apps that actually look good from a UI perspective, which is one of the main things I look for in software. But then I open it up only to be bombarded with some kind of prompt for a monthly or annual subscription — and I just “NOPE” right on out of there and delete the app. Other times I will look at an app listing and see that there are dozens of various in-app purchases for every little feature, and I know they’re just nickel-and-diming users. That’s also a big red flag for me.

I miss the days when I could just pay once for an app or game and then use it forever, as long as it was on my device or was downloadable from the app store I downloaded it from. When it was an app that I knew I would get a lot of use out of daily, like Fantastical or Things, I didn’t mind paying upward of $50 (or more) to have those apps on my iPhone, iPad, and Mac, as these were apps I used daily to make my work life easier.

Playing Oceanhorn 2 on the iPhone 14 Pro
Nadeem Sarwar / DigitalTrends

Of course, developers put major work into their apps, especially for the next major versions. As long as the new version added a lot of big new features, I also didn’t mind paying again for the latest version of their app that I’dbeen using for the past year or longer.

However, the days of pay-once-and-use-forever apps are long gone. It’s rare to find them nowadays, so I’m actually a little surprised when I encounter them every so often. I miss those kinds of apps terribly, but I understand that this method was not sustainable in the long run for the people who worked on the software.

Subscriptions make sense in moderation

Oura Ring, iPhone 13 Pro, and Apple Watch Series 7.
Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

As I’ve continued in my career, I’ve come across some software that I just can’t do without, especially on my iPhone 14 Pro. Some examples include Fantastical, 1Password, Things, Ulysses, Tweetbot, and more. When it’s something that I see value in using every day to make my work or personal life easier, I don’t mind paying the subscription fee. After all, some things really are worth it (for me), and if you spread the cost out over the course of a year, it’s negligible.

But if it’s something that I only need every now and then, I’m much less inclined to subscribe. For example, if I’m looking for an iPhone app that has Google Pixel Magic Eraser functionality and find out that I need to subscribe to even get into the app itself, then I’m just going to delete it and look elsewhere.

Again, I don’t see an issue with subscribing if it’s something that is invaluable and can’t be replaced in my workflow. But there are always alternatives that I can look for, though it just seems like more and more developers are going the route of subscriptions these days — and I simply can’t keep up.

All of those monthly charges add up

App Store displayed on an iPhone 14 Pro against a pink background
Christine Romero-Chan / Digital Trends

A lot of the subscriptions I see are just a few dollars a month, or maybe upward of $50 for an entire year. When you look at these numbers just by themselves, it may not look like much, and really, it’s not. But when everything comes with a subscription, do you really need that email app that costs $5 a month? Or the calendar app that is asking you for $5 each month for some extra features that you may not even use?

And it’s not just subscriptions for apps. We already have other monthly payments for things like cell phone service, maybe several streaming services for music and video, cloud syncing and storage solutions, and whatever else. All of these monthly payments are exhausting, and it just feels like everything is moving to a subscription-based business model lately. Something’s got to give.

I don’t enjoy apps the way I used to

Playing Dianlo Immortal on iPhone 14 Pro
Nadeem Sarwar / DigitalTrends

Many years ago, I got my start in the industry by reviewing mobile apps and games for iOS. I remember I loved seeing whatever hot new app just released, and I was eager to grab a copy and check it out myself.

It’s different now. Most apps today are now very similar to something that I’ve already used before — innovation is rare to see, and everything is pretty much a reskin of something else. And it’s just so disappointing when I launch a new app that does pique my interest, and I see a pop-up on the first launch talking about in-app purchases or subscriptions.

I used to download and try multiple news apps on a weekly or even daily basis. Now, I’m super selective about what I download, and I’m lucky if I even grab something new each week (I don’t count Apple Arcade games because that’s a separate thing). I know I’m not alone on this either, right?

I loved finding and discovering new apps — it was a part of the reason why I loved having a smartphone, such as the iPhone. Now, almost everything needs a subscription to use, and it’s just ruining my overall smartphone experience, especially on iOS. There has to be a better way. Right?

Christine Romero-Chan
Christine Romero-Chan has been writing about technology, specifically Apple, for over a decade. She graduated from California…
Five reasons I’m excited for the new Google Pixel 9a
Person holds Pixel 9a in hand while sitting in a car.

Google has consistently ranked among the best smartphones for its affordable devices over the past six years, particularly with its Pixel A series. The Pixel 3a set the trend for major phone manufacturers to provide a compelling experience at half the price of flagship models, intensifying competition in this segment.

In the last three months, we’ve seen Samsung introduce the Galaxy A56 and Galaxy A36, which deliver features from the Galaxy S25 series at a significantly lower price point. Then there’s Apple, which entered the market with the iPhone 16e, priced considerably higher than its rivals. Additionally, Nothing offers the Nothing Phone 3a and Phone 3a Pro, arguably the best phones available at $379 and $459, respectively.

Read more
I’ve used the iPhone 16 Pro Max for 6 months. Here’s why I love it
The back of the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max.

I bought the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max when it was announced and have used it every day since then, racking up six months of use, and yet I’ve written very little about it. It’s time to change that, explain why it is technically my only “permanent” phone, and why I think it’s superb.
How I use my iPhone

I have two SIM cards. One is my “main” SIM card which is attached to the phone number I use, and the other is all about data, and they both live in different phones. My main SIM is switched in and out of review Android phones all the time, while the SIM I use mostly for data only lives in my Apple iPhone. They’re both always with me, and since September 2024 I’ve used the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max alongside whatever Android phone I’m reviewing.

Read more
Apple might serve a massive front camera upgrade on iPhone 17
An iPhone 16 laying on a shelf with its screen on.

The domain of Apple leaks is currently obsessed with the controversial iPhone 17 Pro design refresh, which could stir some heated debate with its massive camera hump. A lot of chatter is also focused on the svelte iPhone 17 Air. Yet, it seems there are a few other internal upgrades worth getting excited about.
According to analyst Jeff Pu, Apple will equip all four iPhone 17 series models with an upgraded 24-megapixel front camera. So far, Apple has stuck with a 12-megapixel selfie snapper on its mainline iPhones. Moreover, the company hasn’t ever deployed a 24-megapixel camera sensor, keeping its experiments limited to 12-megapixel and 48-megapixel units in the past few years.
The research note by Pu, which was seen by MacRumors and 9to5Mac, doesn’t go into details about the specifications or feature details of the new 24-megapixel front snapper on the iPhone 17 series. However, we can take an educated guess, based on what Apple accomplished when it switched from 12-megapixel to 48-megapixel rear cameras.

A 24-megapixel sensor will most likely default to pixel-binning for delivering pictures and videos at a lower resolution than the native pixel count. Pixel-binning essentially combines the light data collected by adjacent pixels, creating what is colloquially known as a super-pixel.
The sum total of these efforts are pictures that are more detailed and with more realistic color rendering, especially in low-light scenarios. Depending on how the pixels are combined, the final image is usually a lower-resolution shot, but more pleasing to look at.
For example, the iPhone 16 Pro’s 48-megapixel main camera does 4-in-1 pixel binning to produce 12-megapixel pictures, but you can still stick full-res 48-megapixel shots, too. There’s also an intermediary option to to get the best of both worlds with 24-megapixel clicks.
With a 24-megapixel selfie camera coming into the picture, iPhone 17 buyers can expect improved selfies and better-quality video calls. Moreover, since there are more pixels to collect light data, Apple might leverage it to offer more advanced camera features, too.

Read more