Skip to main content

NSA whistleblower Snowden, CNN’s Zakaria face off over encryption

Encryption has been a hot topic these past few months, thanks to the war between Apple and the FBI that erupted after authorities found a locked iPhone left behind by one of the San Bernardino, California, shooters.

Law enforcement agencies around the world are having trouble in their investigations as they cannot access data found in increasingly encrypted devices. Apple’s argument in refusing a court order demanding access is that creating a backdoor for just one phone could threaten the security and privacy of all its customers.

Recommended Videos

The topic of that ongoing battle, which has made its way to Capitol Hill, also set the stage for a debate hosted by New York University’s Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service and the Century Foundation, a nonprofit. A part of the “Debate of the Century” series, the organizations had CNN’s Fareed Zakaria duke it out with former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, who appeared via Google Hangouts.

The official argument was framed around the sentence: “government should have lawful access to any encrypted message or device.” Zakaria, who hosts CNN’s foreign affairs show, is in favor of lawful access and, naturally, NSA whistleblower Snowden is against it.

Are we a nation of laws?

Zakaria had one phrase he kept repeating throughout the debate: “I’m not a technologist.” But putting aside his lack of expertise in encryption technology, Zakaria began his opening statement with an analogy to the Apple vs. FBI encryption war.

“Imagine tomorrow that Bank of America announced that it had a new product — let’s call it an iVault,” Zakaria said. “And Bank of America said this is a virtual vault in which you can put all your bank information, any financial information you have, any other kind of information you want. … It could be your tax receipts, it could be your will, it could be receipts for travel, it could be whatever it is you want to keep secure and safe.”

“I understand that within a democracy, if you have rules of law, you have to sacrifice liberty for security at some point.”

He then asked the audience to imagine a figure, named Bernie Madoff, who embezzled billions of dollars from people’s pension funds. Madoff, in this hypothetical situation, is using an iVault. As the government searches to figure out the extent and scale of the crime, they are approved for a warrant, but Bank of America says, “No, this is encrypted digital information. In fact, our whole sales pitch to our customers is this is encrypted so you can’t have access to it.”

“How would you get around that problem?” Zakaria asked.

The gist of Zakaria’s solutions revolves around mandating laws for the government that strictly demarcate when it can and when it cannot get access to information, and what it can and cannot do with it. If the government does not clarify how it handles these information requests and instead tries to do whatever it wants, Zakaria says we could have a repeat of the Patriot Act when the next terrorist attack occurs.

He also quoted Microsoft founder Bill Gates, who came out against Apple’s stance against the FBI.

“‘Apple has access to this information; they’re just refusing to provide the access, and the courts will tell them whether to provide the access or not,'” Zakaria quoted Gates. “‘You shouldn’t call the access some special thing, it’s no different than asking the phone company to get information or bank records, there is no difference in this information. The government comes asking for a specific set of information, and the bank can say it has tied a ribbon around the disk drive, and says ‘don’t make me cut this ribbon, because if I cut it this one time, I’ll have to cut it many times.””

Apple can and has provided access to these devices in investigations, Zakaria says. No one, not the president nor the biggest tech company in the world, is free from withholding evidence that is “relevant to a court,” he added.

“I understand that within a democracy, if you have rules of law, you have to sacrifice liberty for security at some point,” he said. “This is not an absolutist position. I believe in strong protections for those liberties. I do not want the government abusing its authority; I believe it has. But you cannot have an absolute zone of privacy.”

Math is math

Snowden highlighted the consequences of weakening encryption — that leaving a key under doormat for the government would also make those homes accessible to anyone else.

“Lawful access to any device or communication cannot be provided to anybody without fatally compromising the security of everybody,” Snowden said. “That’s not my opinion either — that’s the formal conclusion from a gathering of the world’s top computer scientists and security experts at MIT to study precisely this issue.”

There is no current method to provide lawful access to the government for information, Snowden says, without risking such access becoming available to anyone else.

“Encryption is a field of mathematics: No matter how much we might hope otherwise, math is math,” he said. “It works the same way for Mother Teresa as it does for Osama bin Laden.”

In closing, Snowden said the NSA and law enforcement is in a much better place than it ever has been for means of investigation.

“The NSA’s own classified documents — what they don’t say in public — say that we are in the golden age of surveillance,” Snowden said. “And they are right — computer security is a real threat. … Saying the government should have lawful access to any encrypted communication is identical to saying the government should mandate weak security for all of us.”

By the end of the debate, a live poll found that 70 percent of respondents in the audience believe the government should not have lawful access to encrypted messages and devices, with only 22 percent siding with Zakaria’s argument (8 percent remained undecided).

Julian Chokkattu
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Julian is the mobile and wearables editor at Digital Trends, covering smartphones, fitness trackers, smartwatches, and more…
Android 16 is finally expanding beyond Google Pixel phones
Android 16 logo on Google Pixel 6a held in hand.

The next major build of Android has reached a handful of new milestones, ahead of its public release. Google has just started the rollout of Android 16’s fourth beta update, reaching the second platform stability. 

Developers who have optimized their apps to target Android 16 can now ship their updates via the Google Play Store. The latest beta update is also the near-final version, as all the app behaviours and background functionalities have been finalized. 

Read more
TORRAS Ostand Air Case deal: save 15% for Earth Day
The iPhones with Ostands, one red, one green, and one purple.

Earth Day is almost here, and TORRAS is making it even easier to celebrate sustainably without sacrificing style. From April 18 to April 25, you can score 15% off the TORRAS Ostand Air Case (available for iPhone 15 Pro Max, iPhone16 Pro, and iPhone 16 Pro Max) when you use code ostand321 at checkout. It's the perfect time to refresh your phone case with something that blends innovation, protection, and nature-inspired design.

Why the TORRAS Ostand Air Stands Out
Light as air but strong as a rock, the Ostand Air is designed for people who want serious protection without the usual bulk. The case features AirMax Cushioning with a dual airbag system, offering 360-degree drop protection. Four-corner core airbags and independent side airbags work together to absorb shocks from drops, bumps, and rough terrain. Whether you're hiking a rocky trail or just navigating a packed commute, those airbags deliver real peace of mind.

Read more
The iPhone 18 may increase in price… but not for the reason you think
A person holding the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max.

Among all the tariff updates that we receive every week, there's one more factor that might make Apple's iPhones pricier: The switch to TSMC's 2nm process node. According to a new leak, Apple, MediaTek, and Qualcomm are well on their way to switching to the 2nm process, and that might increase the cost of some of the best smartphones.

The grim news comes from frequent leaker Digital Chat Station on Weibo. According to the tipster, Apple, Qualcomm, and MediaTek are expected to switch to TSMC's 2nm process in 2026. This is good news performance-wise, but not so much as far as costs are concerned. TSMC's 2nm process will be more efficient, offering better performance across the board, but it'll also cost more than 3nm and 5nm. Because of that, the leaker predicts: "There may be another round of price increases for new phones."

Read more