Skip to main content

After pledging to fight for net neutrality, Obama needs to show the FCC who’s boss

President Obama, if you believe the words that come out of your own mouth, it’s about time you voice your concern over the FCC’s proposal to end net neutrality.

The Federal Communications Commission yesterday proposed new rules that give Internet service providers the power to decide what content moves the fastest on the Web and to charge for access to faster pipes. This means that the online videos and images you get from CNN or Youtube would come in faster and clearer than the content from, say, a friend’s blog or a small organization’s website. The proposed rules basically allow companies with a lot of money to buy the fast lane to the Internet while smaller players get relegated to buffering times.

Recommended Videos

Tim Wu, a Columbia Law School professor and senior adviser to the Federal Trade Commission, called the proposed regulations a “net discrimination rule.” “…if enacted, it will profoundly change the Internet as a platform for free speech and small-scale innovation. It threatens to make the Internet just like everything else in American society: unequal in a way that deeply threatens our long-term prosperity,” Wu wrote in an article published in the New Yorker.   

What’s most surprising about the new rules is not the government’s desire to provide Internet service providers (ISPs) with additional revenue streams while giving everyone else the shaft, it is that the proposal is on the table in spite of Pres. Obama’s repeated statements in support for net neutrality. 

President Obama promised a Net neutrality bill if elected

In a 2007 campaign event, before he became president, Obama was asked: “Would you make it a priority in your first year of office to reinstate Net neutrality as the law of the land? And would you appoint FCC commissioners that support open Internet principles like Net neutrality?”

“The answer is yes… I am a strong supporter of Net neutrality,” he replied. “What you’ve been seeing is some lobbying that says the servers and the various portals through which you’re getting information over the Internet should be able to be gatekeepers and to charge different rates to different Web sites…so you could get much better quality from the Fox News site and you’d be getting rotten service from the mom and pop sites… And that I think destroys one of the best things about the Internet- which is that there is this incredible equality there.”

He continued to support it during his first term

His support for Net neutrality legislation didn’t waver when he assumed office. In 2010, a White House blog post read, “President Obama is strongly committed to Net neutrality in order to keep an open Internet that fosters investment, innovation, consumer choice, and free speech.” 

The entry lauded the FCC’s proposed basic rules of the road, which then-FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski praised by saying: “The openness of the Internet has enabled unparalleled innovation and job growth, yet we continue to find examples of this freedom being attacked. We have found instances when broadband providers position themselves as gatekeepers to the Internet, and have prevented consumers from using applications of their choice without disclosing what they were doing. We must take action to protect consumers against price hikes and closed access to the Internet—and our proposed framework is designed to do just that: to guard against these risks while recognizing the legitimate needs and interests of broadband providers.”                

In 2011, he pledged to veto the opposition’s moves to torpedo the Net neutrality rules that the FCC adopted the year before. Senate Journal Resolution 6, a joint resolution that disapproves the FCC rule, said that the regulations “shall have no force or effect.”

“If the President is presented with S.J. Res. 6, which would not safeguard the free and open Internet, his senior advisers would recommend that he veto the resolution,” the White House answered in a statement.           

In January, he said “preserving an open Internet is vital”

In January 2014, a federal appeals court struck down several provisions in the FCC’s Open Internet Rules. This meant that the agency cannot require ISPs to provide Internet service equally. In response to the court defeat, Obama said: “Preserving an open Internet is vital not to just to the free flow of information, but also to promoting innovation and economic productivity … Absent net neutrality, the Internet could turn into a high-priced private toll road that would be inaccessible to the next generation of visionaries.”

He made the statement in response to a White House petition, which requested that he direct the FCC to reclassify ISPs as “common carriers.” This meant that the FCC would have regulatory powers over ISPs. That provision remains in the FCC’s new proposal and is expected to gain opposition from Republican lawmakers.

Obama even voiced Net neutrality support on a Google Hangout

In late January 2014, Obama appeared in a Google Hangout session as part of a “virtual whistle-stop tour.” In response to a Net neutrality question, he said: “It’s something that I’ve cared deeply about ever since I ran for office, in part because my own campaign was empowered by a free and open Internet and the ability for citizens all across this country to engage and create and find new ways, new tools to mobilize themselves. A lot of that couldn’t have been done if there were a lot of commercial barriers and roadblocks. So I’ve been a strong supporter of Net neutrality. The new commissioner of the FCC, Tom Wheeler, who I appointed, I know is a strong supporter of Net neutrality.”

Obama needs to speak up against this FCC bill

With the new FCC proposal coming to light, Obama’s words about Tom Wheeler supporting Net neutrality seem ironic. Wheeler has proposed that ISPs like Comcast should have the ability to ink deals to provide extra fast access to companies who can pay for it, essentially creating a tiered Internet.

The FCC will accept comments on the proposal if the five-member commission (made up of three Democrats and two Republicans) approves the version of the Net neutrality rules. If the proposals progress beyond that, final regulations are expected by this summer. 

While the president has yet to comment on the new proposal, the White House said previously that it cannot force the FCC to reclassify broadband service. From a legal perspective, that’s true. In 1987, Ronald Reagan vetoed legislation for the “fairness doctrine,” which required radio and television stations to allocate airtime for the discussion of different views of public importance. Even with the veto, the fairness doctrine remained as FCC policy.

However, it’s hard to believe that President Obama has his hands tied, especially with three Democrats on the commission and an FCC commissioner that he appointed himself.

So we have to ask: President Obama, do you still support Net neutrality?

Christian Brazil Bautista
Christian Brazil Bautista is an experienced journalist who has been writing about technology and music for the past decade…
Miss the Galaxy S25 Edge unveil? Watch the full reveal here
Samsung's new S25 Edge.

Samsung has finally unveiled its thinnest-ever Galaxy S series smartphone, the Galaxy S25 Edge. The Korean tech giant introduced the new handset via an online video presentation that started at 8 p.m. ET on Monday, May 12.

If you missed the 14-minute presentation, you can watch it via the video player embedded at the top of this page. 

Read more
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: Slim or XL?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge on a display rack.

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is the first new Edge-branded Samsung phone since the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge, and Samsung hasn't brought that premium branding back lightly. The S25 Edge is one of the slimmest big phones we'ver ever seen, with an S25 Plus-rivaling 6.7-inch display, but a thickness of just 5.9mm — a whole 2mm slimmer than most other flagships. And that slimline approach doesn't mean Samsung has sacrificed power, as the S25 Edge also comes with a top-tier Snapdragon processor, 200-megapixel camera, and a stunning design.

But can a phone this slim really compete? Chief amongst concerns for this new phone is its battery capacity. Can a slim phone really have the lifespan to match other large flagship phones in its price bracket? We've compared it to the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL, one of the most powerful and large phones that's capable of going toe-to-toe with Samsung's latest. Which one came out on top? You'll have to read on to find out.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: specs

Read more
Sony’s Xperia VII will capture smooth video without you even looking
Sony Xperia 1 VII

Sony has announced its latest flagship phone, which as the numerous rumors over the last couple of weeks have predicted, is called the Xperia 1 VII. It succeeds the Xperia 1 VI that launched in May 2024 and it incorporates technologies from Sony's Alpha cameras, Walkman audio players, and the company's BRAVIA televisions, integrating these features through 'Xperia Intelligence' for enhanced camera, audio, and viewing experiences.

As has been the case for several years with Sony phones, the focus of the Xperia 1 VII continues to be its camera capabilities and while there have only been some slight adjustments to the camera lenses themselves, new software tricks have been introduced for 2025. 

Read more