Skip to main content

Uber background checks on drivers missed ex-convicts, prosecutors say

uber x berlin june black car
Uber is now worth such a huge amount, and continues to expand its ride-hailing service at such a rate, that it must be doing something right. What it’s not doing right, according to California prosecutors, are background checks on its drivers, with claims this week alleging Uber has been occasionally employing drivers with convictions for murder and sex offenses despite insistence its screening system is among the most effective in the industry.

The prosecutors assertions, made on Wednesday and reported by the NY Times, were presented as an amendment to a consumer protection lawsuit filed in December that accuses Uber of misleading the public about the safety of the service as well as the robustness of its background checks on new drivers.

Related Videos

The district attorneys of San Francisco and Los Angeles note in the lawsuit that Uber refrains from running fingerprint checks on those applying for work as a driver, while the procedure is a necessity for new taxi drivers in California.

They said the ride-hailing service’s existing procedures, which include checks of county, federal, and multi-state criminal background records, led to the company missing criminal records for 25 Uber applicants in San Francisco and Los Angeles, adding that this was partly due to Uber ignoring a database listing some 30,000 registered sex offenders, and also because its checks only cover the preceding seven years.

“So, for example, if someone was convicted of kidnapping eight years ago, and they were just paroled last week — they just got out of prison — the Uber background check process will not identify the person as a convicted kidnapper,” San Francisco district attorney George Gascón said in a press conference Wednesday.

Drivers that slipped through Uber’s net included one released in 2008 after spending 26 years in jail for second-degree murder — he changed his name before applying to become a driver. The lawsuit says a fingerprint test would’ve brought the matter to light and enabled Uber to act accordingly.

In a statement to the NY Times, Uber said that no checking system is “100-percent foolproof. ” It added that checks on former taxi drivers applying to join Uber, “uncovered convictions for driving under the influence, rape, attempted murder, child abuse and violence,” suggesting that in some cases its own checks are more effective than those of the California taxi industry.

The company has also this year been making moves to improve the safety of both riders and drivers with a raft of measures that include, for example, the gradual rollout of incident response teams available around the clock to address “serious safety concerns.”

Editors' Recommendations

Apple’s $30M settlement over worker bag checks OK’d by court
The Apple logo is displayed at the Apple Store June 17, 2015 on Fifth Avenue in New York City

After bouncing around California courts for nearly a decade, a California federal judge has finally given the green light to Apple’s $30 million settlement in a lawsuit that accused it of failing to pay thousands of its retail workers for the time taken up by security checks after their official working hours ended.

Apple agreed to the settlement last year, and on Monday U.S. District Judge William Alsup signed off on it.

Read more
Latest iOS 16 beta addresses rising safety concerns for message editing
Close up detail of a man iMessaging on an iPhone.

Apple has just released the fourth developer beta of iOS 16, and among the usual collection of bug fixes and performance improvements, the company has also taken some significant steps to help curb the potential abuse of its new iMessage editing feature.

When Apple unveiled iOS 16 at its Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) in June, it announced the update would bring the capability of editing and unsending iMessages sent through the Messages app. While this isn't an entirely new feature -- services like WhatsApp and Facebook have allowed folks to take back their sent messages for years -- Apple's implementation raised concerns among some domestic safety advocates.
What's changed in iOS 16 beta 4
With the release of the fourth developer beta of iOS 16, it appears Apple has taken those concerns to heart. The time frame to unsend a message has been reduced from 15 minutes to two minutes -- the exact change that attorney Simpson Tuegel recommended. In a letter she sent to Tim Cook, the survivor advocate pointed out that "a sender of such a message, in most situations, will immediately realize the error," so two minutes should be more than sufficient. More importantly, she adds, someone who intends to use iMessage "for bullying and harassment will face much greater risk if they know their messages become 'permanent' after two minutes."

Read more
Amazon sues 10,000 Facebook groups over fake reviews
Amazon logo on the headquarters building.

When it comes to reviews on Amazon and similar shopping sites, most people have by now developed their own approach to dealing with them.

Some use a blend of instinct and experience to decide if what they’re reading is genuine, while others scan a broad selection to try to get an overall feel for a product’s reputation. Of course, some folks simply ignore them altogether.

Read more