Skip to main content

Uber goes on offensive in Europe, files complaints against authorities

It’s fair to say there’s been more than a few bumps in the road for Uber’s European operation.

With bans imposed in Germany, France, and Spain, offices raided by armed cops in Paris, and drivers coming under attack from taxi drivers in Amsterdam and Brussels, a lesser company would’ve probably slammed on the brakes by now. But not Uber.

Determined that its ride-sharing service will succeed in Europe, the San Francisco-based company has in recent weeks filed complaints against three governments – Germany, France, and this week, Spain – claiming that each one has broken European Union (EU) laws by imposing bans on its service.

The company says EU policies should dictate whether its services can operate, not individual countries.

“This is supposed to be a single market,” Uber’s Mark McGann told the Wall Street Journal this week, adding, “What we’re finding is that we’re getting treated in completely different ways in different countries, and even within individual countries.”

Uber is currently operating freely in a number of EU nations, including the UK, a situation that demonstrates a lack of consistency, as far as Uber’s concerned.

The company’s car-based service has caused consternation among traditional taxi firms across Europe, with many insisting its drivers should be banned from operating as they lack proper licensing and function outside regulations imposed on regular taxi firms.

Jakub Adamowicz, a spokesperson for the European Commission, which deals with Europe-wide regulation, confirmed to Sky News that it’d received Uber’s complaints and was “carefully assessing” them.

Adamowicz said its decision rests on whether the commission can be convinced of Uber’s claim that it’s more a mobile app firm than a transport company.

The Commission has more power to act if it considers the service as more of an e-commerce enterprise than a transportation effort. If it’s the latter, each national government has the power to decide its own policy.

“Uber is a technology, but it is a technology that has an impact on transportation,” Adamowicz told Sky News.

If the Commission finds that EU rules have indeed been broken, we could see a situation where the governments involved are hit with various penalties.

Europe is, of course, a massive and vital market for Uber, and it’ll be desperate to win its fight to continue running its service across the whole of the EU. A ruling in response to Uber’s recently filed complaints is expected in the coming weeks.

Editors' Recommendations

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Here’s what we learned from Mark Zuckerberg’s EU hearing on privacy
zuckerberg eu grilling live stream mark  2018

After being grilled by the United States Congress last month, Mark Zuckerberg again found himself testifying before a governmental body -- this time the European Parliament. In addition to the Cambridge Analytica scandal, Zuckerberg addressed issues related to the GDPR, or General Data Protection Regulation, a law going into effect in the EU on Friday, May 25.

"We haven't done enough to prevent [Facebook] from being used for harm. We didn’t take a broad enough view of our responsibility. That was a mistake and I am sorry for it," Zuckerberg said in his opening remarks.

Read more
More regulations are coming as EU rules that Uber is not simply an app
eu rules uber more than app elevate 2

Uber's year of trials and tribulations is not over yet, and not getting any better. On Wednesday, December 20, the Court of Justice of the European Union determined that Uber is not simply an app or a tech platform, but rather a transport service. As a result, the company must comply with the transportation regulations of the EU's member states, and cannot simply assert that its services fall exclusively under the jurisdiction of the more lax ecommerce guidelines.

According to the European Union's top court, Uber's "intermediation service … must be regarded as being inherently linked to a transport service and, accordingly, must be classified as ‘a service in the field of transport’ within the meaning of EU law.” The decision continued, “Consequently, such a service must be excluded from the scope of the freedom to provide services in general as well as the directive on services in the internal market and the directive on electronic commerce. It follows that, as EU law currently stands, it is for the Member States to regulate the conditions under which such services are to be provided.”

Read more
Uber defends greyballing, which authorities allege is used to deceive law enforcement
uber reviw greyball

U.S. city and international authorities allege Uber has been systematically using a software tool called "Greyball" to elude law enforcement in areas where the ride-sharing service has been banned, according to The New York Times.  Uber recently posted an explanation of its uses of "greyballing" in the company's online newsroom defending the tool and announcing a review of past use.

Greyball is part of a larger program -- violation of terms of service (VTOS) -- the company uses to detect people it believes are misusing or targeting Uber's ridesharing service. In Uber's post, the company's Chief Security Office Joe Sullivan wrote that greyballing is used to hide the regular Uber app screen from individual users in order to test new features by employees, for marketing promotions, to prevent fraud, protect drivers from physical harm, and "to deter riders using the app in violation of our terms of service."

Read more