Skip to main content

FAA says that ‘Uber for the skies’ is illegal

So extensive is Uber’s influence that other startups have taken to describing themselves in terms of the car service company. From “the Uber of the beauty industry” to “the Uber of home decor,” it seems as though every industry is jumping on the community-based, on-demand service model. But unfortunately, not all of them can — not legally, at least. On Friday, a Washington, D.C., court refused to review a previous Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) decision banning private pilots from sharing flight costs with their passengers, effectively outlawing “the Uber of the skies.”

The request for review came from a company called Flytenow, one of many companies that seek to connect pilots with empty seats aboard their planes to eager passengers with a penchant for private planes. The FAA has ruled that pilots who wish to engage in this sort of activity must have commercial licenses. Otherwise, the agency ruled, there exists a danger that passengers “will contract with pilots who in fact lack the experience and credentials of commercial pilots.”

Recommended Videos

While this may seem like semantics, the fact of the matter remains that private and commercial pilots are subjected to rather disparate levels of scrutiny. While both must abide by FAA safety regulations, the three-judge panel noted, “Regulators have good reasons to distinguish between pilots who are licensed to offer services to the public and those who are not.”

Still, lawyers for these companies insist that the regulations are superfluous and indeed unnecessary in the grander scheme of things. Rebecca MacPherson, who represents Flytenow competitor AirPooler, noted that these flight-sharing services wouldn’t even allow private pilots to make a profit. Rather, they would “receive only partial reimbursement for fuel and other costs,” all of which is in line with a 1964 FAA law. “You’re not going to make any money doing this,” she said in an interview with The Next Web. “All you’re going to do is defray some of your costs, which the FAA has said is OK in the past. The only thing that is different is you’re using social media.”

But until the FAA changes its mind, the air’s version of Uber just won’t be a reality.

Lulu Chang
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
FAA gives UPS’ drone delivery efforts a big boost
A UPS delivery drone built by Matternet.

In a boost for UPS’s drone delivery ambitions, the company has been given clearance by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to fly its machines beyond the line of sight, meaning they can now fly greater distances to a delivery location.

Before the FAA’s approval, drone flights by the shipping giant needed someone on the ground to keep visual track of the machine as it flew through the sky to ensure safe travel.

Read more
Is 5G dangerous for airplanes? Here’s what pilots and the FAA say
Aircraft among clouds descending for a landing.

After months of wrangling with the aviation industry, AT&T and Verizon finally got the green light to go live with their new C-Band 5G rollouts earlier this year. While both carriers had to make some concessions to placate fears that the new spectrum would interfere with aircraft instruments, some pilots are now wondering if those were enough.

Throughout most of 2021, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and key aviation industry stakeholders argued that the frequencies used by the new C-band spectrum sat perilously close to those occupied by critical aircraft instruments, such as radar altimeters. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), AT&T, and Verizon disagreed — citing studies conducted by the government regulator that showed little to no risk.

Read more
The Uber hack is an outrageous tale of a teen hacking for fun
An Uber cab

Uber suffered a serious breach of its system earlier this month, allowing the bad actor to wreak all sorts of havoc — from spamming the employee Slack chats with explicit imagery to defacing the internal websites and stealing sensitive media. The ride-sharing company has now released an updated statement, putting the blame on the infamous Lapsus$ hacking group.

The attack, and the subsequent announcement, were so brazen that some employees took it as a joke from one of their colleagues and responded to the hacker's message with light-hearted emojis. The hacker revealed to The New York Times that he was an 18-year-old person. To further rub salt into Uber’s wounds, the cybercriminal told The Washington Post that he breached the company’s systems for fun and might leak the source code in the coming months.

Read more