Skip to main content

Cable companies saw huge numbers of subscribers flee in Q2 2016

cable subscribers loss q2 2016 set top box subscription
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Whether pay-TV subscriptions can survive long term in a world of streaming services and digital video entertainment has been up for debate in recent years, and while there still isn’t a definitive answer, new research paints a dark picture for cable companies. Leichtman Research Group has released a report finding that not only did the 10 of the 11 largest pay-TV providers in the U.S. lose subscribers in Q2 2016, the losses substantially increased compared to the year before.

Given that the 11 largest cable companies represent 95 percent of the market, the numbers are telling. The report shows that overall, the companies, lost 665,000 net video subscribers in Q2 2016; the number far exceeds Q2 2015’s net loss of 545,000 subscribers. While Q2 is historically bad for cable companies, according to Ars Technica, this year was a particularly bad one. Only DirecTV saw net gains, adding 342,000 subscribers.

Recommended Videos

Interestingly, the picture was not quite as bleak for the top six cable companies as it was for the group overall; their losses actually decreased compared to Q2 2015, dropping from 340,000 lost subscribers to 225,000. The quarter may have been bad for the market overall, but it was actually the best in terms of losses since 2006 for the top six companies.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

Nonetheless, there is still plenty to give cable companies pause. “Over the past year, the top pay-TV providers (including Dish’s Sling TV) lost about 705,000 subscribers — compared to a loss of about 380,000 over the prior year,” said Bruce Leichtman, president and principal analyst for Leichtman Research Group, in a press release.

The top 11 companies do have a subscriber based of 93.75 million, so 705,000 subscribers is a relatively small percentage, but the fact that losses have increased overall is notable. Although the report didn’t point to a cause, it seems likely that the emergence of digital alternatives has played a role. Pay-TV subscriptions may not be on the brink of extinction, but cable companies will have to continue to adapt to the threat.

Stephanie Topacio Long
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Stephanie Topacio Long is a writer and editor whose writing interests range from business to books. She also contributes to…
The Flash director says the film failed because people ‘don’t care’ about the DC hero
Barry Allen runs through the Speed Force in The Flash.

It's been nearly two years since The Flash hit theaters in 2023, and the film remains one of the most infamous bombs in recent comic book movie history. Its director, Andy Muschietti, isn't confused about why the film failed, though. During an interview on Radio Tu’s La Baulera del Coso, Muschietti said that he believes The Flash performed so poorly because it wasn't as widely appealing as everyone, including himself and its producers at Warner Bros. Pictures, hoped it would be.

"The Flash failed, among all the other reasons, because it wasn’t a movie that appealed to all four quadrants. It failed at that,” Muschietti argued. “When you spend $200 million making a movie, [Warner Bros.] wants you to bring even your grandmother to the theaters.”

Read more
Sebastian Stan says Thunderbolts is Marvel’s Breakfast Club
Bucky Barnes stands in the desert in Marvel's Thunderbolts.

Marvel Studios may have released only one film last year, but it has three theatrical titles coming in 2025. The movies in question -- February's Captain America: Brave New World, May's Thunderbolts*, and July's The Fantastic Four: First Steps -- all promise to move the Marvel Cinematic Universe's Multiverse Saga forward in their own unique ways. The three also seem very different from each other. Brave New World, for instance, is being marketed as a paranoid political thriller, while Fantastic Four has seemingly adopted a retro-futuristic, '60s-inspired aesthetic.

As for Thunderbolts*, one of the film's stars says that it has more in common with a classic 1980s coming-of-age dramedy than comic book fans may expect. "Thunderbolts* is really interesting because it was so fun, man," Sebastian Stan, who is set to make his MCU return as Bucky Barnes in the forthcoming film, revealed during his recent appearance on Variety's Awards Circuit Podcast. "I'm curious to see how people are going to respond [to it] because the closest [film] that comes [to mind] is that movie The Breakfast Club."

Read more
5 years ago, this sci-fi Alien rip-off drowned at the box office. Is it worthy of reappraisal?
The aqua suits in the movie Underwater

Five years ago in January 2020, just as the COVID-19 pandemic started to make its first headlines, a different kind of disaster arrived in movie theaters: Underwater. The movie starred Kristen Stewart, and based on the trailers, it looked to pay homage to older sci-fi horror classics. Yet Underwater turned out to be a super clunky, visually murky, and ill-paced film about a deep-sea mining station at the bottom of the Mariana Trench that inadvertently wakes up a giant deep-sea monster.

In theory, Underwater should have been enjoyable. Even if it added nothing to the genre and was just a poor homage to Alien, Cloverfield, and The Abyss, it should have been at least derivative fun. But it wasn't, and audiences stayed away from the big-budget film. So what went wrong, and is Underwater worth watching five years later now that it's available to stream at home?
Why Underwater is a Cthulhu-sized disaster
Underwater | Official Trailer [HD] | 20th Century FOX

Read more