Skip to main content

Studio meddling pushed him out of Stephen King’s IT, says True Detective’s Cary Fukunaga

Back in May, True Detective director Cary Fukunaga made a sudden and unexpected exit from New Line Studios’ big-screen adaptation of Stephen King’s IT, reportedly due to creative differences over the film’s budget. In a recent interview, however, the Emmy-winning director indicated that budget had nothing to do with his departure.

According to Fukunaga, his decision to leave IT was based on differences with the studio over the content and direction of the film.

Recommended Videos

“I was trying to make an unconventional horror film,” Fukunaga told Variety. “It didn’t fit into the algorithm of what they knew they could spend and make money back on, based on not offending their standard genre audience. Our budget was perfectly fine. We were always hovering at the $32 million mark, which was their budget. It was the creative that we were really battling.”

Fukunaga went on to suggest that the two-part structure he was envisioning for the story didn’t go over well with the studio, which wanted something a little more traditional for its big-screen version of Stephen King’s terrifying 1986 novel.

“It was two movies. [New Line] didn’t care about that,” he continued. “In the first movie, what I was trying to do was an elevated horror film with actual characters. They didn’t want any characters. They wanted archetypes and scares. I wrote the script. They wanted me to make a much more inoffensive, conventional script. But I don’t think you can do proper Stephen King and make it inoffensive.”

Fukunaga went on to describe his plans for Pennywise the Clown, the nightmare-inducing personification of the evil entity at the heart of King’s story. Memorably played by Tim Curry in the 1990 television miniseries Stephen King’s IT, Pennywise was to be played by talented young actor Will Poulter (The Maze Runner) in the new film — an unconventional casting choice that generated quite a bit of buzz when it was announced.

That wasn’t the only new direction Fukunaga planned to take the character of Pennywise, either.

“The main difference was making Pennywise more than just the clown,” he said of the iconic character. “After 30 years of villains that could read the emotional minds of characters and scare them, trying to find really sadistic and intelligent ways he scares children, and also the children had real lives prior to being scared. And all that character work takes time. It’s a slow build, but it’s worth it, especially by the second film. But definitely even in the first film, it pays off.”

“It was being rejected,” Fukunaga went on in his detailed explanation of the breakdown of his relationship with the studio. “Every little thing was being rejected and asked for changes. Our conversations weren’t dramatic. It was just quietly acrimonious. We didn’t want to make the same movie. We’d already spent millions on pre-production. I certainly did not want to make a movie where I was being micro-managed all the way through production, so I couldn’t be free to actually make something good for them. I never desire to screw something up. I desire to make something as good as possible.”

With Mama director Andy Muschietti now rumored to be the front-runner to replace Fukunaga on the film, the studio is also expected to do a rewrite of the script penned by Fukunaga, David Kajganich, and Chase Palmer. According to Fukunaga, this comes as welcome news.

“We invested years and so much anecdotal storytelling in it,” he explained. “Chase and I both put our childhood in that story. So our biggest fear was they were going to take our script and bastardize it. So I’m actually thankful that they are going to rewrite the script. I wouldn’t want them stealing our childhood memories and using that. I mean, I’m not sure if the fans would have liked what I would had done. I was honoring King’s spirit of it, but I needed to update it. King saw an earlier draft and liked it.”

There’s currently no timetable for New Line’s adaptation of IT to begin production.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

Rick Marshall
A veteran journalist with more than two decades of experience covering local and national news, arts and entertainment, and…
Stephen King’s most underrated movie deserves your attention this Halloween
A wounded man sits down in The Dark Half.

Author Stephen King has had his writing adapted for film and television several times in the past 50 years. Since so many interpretations of his work have been made, some films and TV shows were bound to have fallen under the radar. One King adaptation that audiences have sorely overlooked is 1993's The Dark Half.
Based on King's 1989 novel of the same name, this horror film follows bestselling novelist Thad Beaumont as he decides to retire his pen name, "George Stark," and holds a mock burial for him, only for Stark to become an actual person hellbent on terrorizing Beaumont and everyone close to him as revenge for his "death" years before.
THE DARK HALF (1991) | Official Trailer | MGM

The Dark Half failed to recoup its $15 million budget, making around $10.6 million at the box office. Like the most recent version of Salem's Lot, this movie was lucky to have been released at all, as it had finished filming for two years by the time Orion Pictures decided to distribute it. The Dark Half may be a bit too dramatic for modern tastes, but the film has earned considerable praise and deserves greater recognition from audiences. Now that Halloween is almost here, it's time to dig deep into the annals of spooky cinema and explore why The Dark Half is such an underrated film.
The Dark Half has a clever story

Read more
30 years ago, a beloved Stephen King adaptation flopped at the box office
Prisoners stand in a prison yard in The Shawshank Redemption.

Stephen King has inspired more Hollywood adaptations of his work than almost any other writer. His novels and short stories served as the source material for some of the most acclaimed and iconic horror movies of the 1970s, '80s, and '90s, including Brian De Palma's Carrie, Stanley Kubrick's The Shining, and Rob Reiner's Misery. Even now, 50 years after the release of his debut novel, King's work continues to inspire new, high-profile adaptations (see: Mike Flanagan's Doctor Sleep and Andy Muschietti's It).

King is inarguably best known as a horror writer. However, one of the most beloved adaptations of his work also happens to be based on one of his more noteworthy non-horror stories. The film in question, The Shawshank Redemption, has found its place among the most popular and well-known movies in Hollywood history. Despite that, it was an infamous box office bomb when it was released in 1994 — grossing only $16 million in its initial theatrical run. More popular releases, like Quentin Tarantino's Pulp Fiction, initially overshadowed it that year. Since then, however, The Shawshank Redemption's reputation has improved and grown.

Read more
Stephen King’s best novel gets a new movie remake with Salem’s Lot
Five people stand at the bottom of the hill and stare at a house.

Max has finally released the long-awaited first trailer for Salem's Lot, an upcoming horror film based on Stephen King's 1975 novel.

Lewis Pullman stars as Ben Mears, a writer who returns to his childhood home in Jerusalem's Lot in search of inspiration for his next book. Ben discovers a sadistic vampire is preying upon the town's residents, sending everything into complete chaos.

Read more