Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Entertainment
  3. Features

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

5 reasons why the original Gladiator is still worth watching

Add as a preferred source on Google
Russell Crowe points a sword as a man stands behind him with one.
Universal Pictures

Twenty-four years ago, the world witnessed Russell Crowe’s Maximus Decimus Meridius become a hero in the arena in Gladiator. After being sold into slavery, Maximus becomes a gladiator, rising the ranks in the arena and setting his sights on avenging the deaths of his family. Directed by Ridley Scott, Gladiator was the second-highest-grossing film of 2000 and won five Oscars, including Best Picture.

This November, Scott will revisit these legendary warriors in Ancient Rome for Gladiator II. The sequel follows Lucius Verus (Paul Mescal), the son of Connie Nielsen’s Lucilla. After the Roman army invades his home, Lucius is sold into slavery and trains to fight as a gladiator. The first trailer for Gladiator II looks spectacular. Only time will tell if Gladiator II lives up to the hype. What isn’t up for debate is the legacy of Gladiator, an action-packed drama that still holds up to this day.

Recommended Videos

Action scenes remain exhilarating

Gladiator - Colosseum Battle

Scott establishes that Gladiator will be an epic action film from the opening battle, with Crowe leading the way. It’s an appetizer for the gladiatorial fights to follow. The first gladiator fight features Maximus, Juba (Djimon Hounsou), and the rest of Proximo’s slaves chained to a partner as they take on several masked fighters. During this fight, the violence is on full display, with unrelenting violence and gruesome kills. These are fights to the death and therefore must be brutal.

Once Maximus enters the Colosseum, the action intensifies, beginning with the magnificent reenactment of the Battle of Zama. Despite being outmatched, Maximus leads the gladiators to victory. While his showdown against Commodus puts the cherry on top of a great movie, Maximus’ fight against Tigris of Gaul (Sven-Ole Thorsen) is the superior one-on-one fight. Maximus even avoids being eaten by a tiger in this confrontation. Maximus, do not worry. We are entertained.

Revenge is a dish that audiences still eat up

Gladiator (2000) - My Name is Maximus Scene | Movieclips

Part of Gladiator’s appeal is its easy-to-understand revenge story. Simplicity really can be perfection, especially for a plot. Gladiator’s plot in three sentences: “The general who became a slave. The slave who became a gladiator. The gladiator who defied an emperor.” That’s as straightforward as it gets. Revenge always plays.

Scott knows the action in the arena is the selling point. The side plot involving Maximus’ quest to escape captivity, reunite with his soldiers, and return power to the Roman senate is entertaining. In the grand scheme of things, however, it’s not why audiences return to Gladiator. To quote Tom Sizemore from Heat“The action is the juice.” Maximus’ quest for revenge on the arena sands is the draw.

Russell Crowe at the peak of his powers

Russell Crowe standing and yelling in a scene from Gladiator.
Universal Pictures

From 1997 to 2003, Crowe had one of the all-time runs for any actor. After starring in some Australian films in the early 1990s, Crowe gained international recognition, especially with American audiences, in 1997’s L.A. Confidential. Crowe would become an Academy staple with Oscar nominations in three consecutive years for 1999’s The Insider, 2000’s Gladiator, and 2001’s A Beautiful Mind.

Add 2003’s Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World to the mix, and that’s a hall-of-fame resume. All that said, Gladiator is the performance that won him an Oscar and etched his name into history. Crowe’s intensity, physicality, and stoicism are perfect traits for the honorable Maximus Decimus Meridius.

The ensemble cast brings their A-games

A man sits next to a young boy and puts his hand on his shoulder.
Universal Pictures

Crowe is the only actor in the cast to walk away with the Oscar. However, there is a strong argument for Joaquin Phoenix as the winner of Gladiator. Compared to Crowe, Phoenix has a harder task of making the audience despise him from the second he walks on screen. Commodus is a spoiled brat and narcissist who never gets what he wants.

Besides Phoenix, Gladiator’s other noteworthy performances include Connie Nielsen as Lucilla, Commodus’ tortured sister who must walk on eggshells around her incestuous brother to protect her son; Djimon Hounsou as Juba, Maximus’ fellow gladiator and friend who brings a steady presence to the film; and Richard Harris as Marcus Aurelius, the emperor torn between doing what’s right for his people and being the father his son needs.

The movie’s Best Picture win has aged well

"Gladiator" winning Best Picture | 73rd Oscars (2001)

How a film ages is an important part of its legacy. Did Gladiator’s win for Best Picture age gracefully or poorly? The debate for the best movie of 2000 will never end, and to be honest, Gladiator isn’t it. Almost Famous gets my vote. However, Gladiator‘s win in Best Picture over Chocolat, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, Erin Brockovich, and Traffic was the right decision.

Certain filmmaking aspects in those Oscar-nominated films are superior to Gladiator, including the hand-to-hand combat sequences in Crouching Tiger and the camerawork in Traffic. However, Gladiator is the best overall movie in the category when you combine performances, direction, story, and production design. The visuals are magnificent, and the action is spellbinding.

This isn’t a Crash or Green Book situation. Gladiator deserved its win and represents one of the last original spectacles to take home the movie community’s most prestigious prize.

You can stream Gladiator for free on Pluto TV.

Dan Girolamo
Former Entertainment Writer
Dan is a passionate and multitalented content creator with experience in pop culture, entertainment, and sports. Throughout…
Topics
Letterboxd could find a new home at Netflix, but Sony is fighting for it, too
Netflix wants Letterboxd, but Hollywood isn't letting it go without a fight
Letterboxd

Letterboxd, the fast-growing social network for film lovers, could soon have a new owner. According to a report by Puck News, the New Zealand-based platform has been exploring a potential sale, attracting interest from several major entertainment companies, including Netflix, Sony Pictures Entertainment, and Paramount Skydance.

While no deal has been confirmed, the discussions highlight how valuable online fan communities have become as streaming platforms compete not just for viewers, but also for the audiences that influence what people watch next.

Read more
Disney+ is exploring a free tier to fight back against YouTube’s growing TV dominance
Disney is eyeing a free tier as YouTube keeps stealing its TV audience
The Disney+ app on a TV screen while blue lights illuminate the wall behind.

Watching Disney+ without paying for a subscription could eventually become an option. According to Business Insider, Disney is considering a free tier that would let people watch some content without a paywall.

The idea is still in the early stages, with no timeline or launch details, but it reflects a growing challenge. YouTube and other free, ad-supported platforms like Tubi and Roku are attracting more TV viewers, forcing streaming services to rethink how they compete.

Read more
Netflix is worried people aren’t watching enough so its next move could change the app forever
Netflix's next big update could look a lot more like cable TV
Netflix on TV couple watching

Netflix has spent years telling the entertainment industry that binge-worthy originals and a simple user experience were enough to stay ahead. That strategy helped make it the world's biggest streaming service. But according to a Wall Street Journal report, the company is increasingly concerned about a different metric: engagement.

While Netflix continues to post healthy profits and retains one of the lowest subscriber cancellation rates in the industry, executives are reportedly seeing early signs that people are spending less time watching content. That matters because engagement - not just subscriber numbers - has become one of the biggest indicators of whether customers will stick around, watch ads, and continue paying for the service.

Read more