Skip to main content

How the ‘fascist’ logo for ‘Star Wars’ was created

How to Draw the Star Wars Logo
The new Star Wars epic Rogue One is dominating the theaters. While the plots may evolve from film to film, we can always count on seeing the massive, orchestral opening of the Star Wars series that sets the tone for what’s about to follow. You get that huge fanfare, the long scroll, and that ubiquitous logo. But did you know the history behind that unique design? It all started in a galaxy far, far … well, you know.
Recommended Videos

According to The Hollywood Reporter, the logo is the work of Suzy Rice, who at the time was a young designer at the Seiniger Advertising agency. 20th Century Fox rang it up to do some logo work for a little science fiction movie they were working on.

It was to be called Star Wars.

At his Industrial Light & Magic studios, George Lucas was quite specific with Rice about what he was looking for, to give his nascent film the proper identity. “He said that for the logo, he wanted ‘something that is very fascist,’ would ‘be intimidating,’ and that would ‘rival AT&T.'”

It turns out, in a matter of timing that would prove historical for everyone involved, Rice had been reading a book the previous night on German type design, which covered how high ranking Nazi Joseph Goebbels wanted all public signs to have a “uniform font.” As THR notes, “it was all part of the fascist’s control by enforcing conformity.” The font he eventually went for is unknown, but it was said to have influenced Helvetica, which arrived after the end of the Nazi regime. Rice says in a blog post that she chose Helvetica Black for the Star Wars logo.

How did the process go? Sounds like it was pretty straightforward. “(I) drew the two title words on two lines, stacking and squaring them (‘intimidating’ and ‘fascist’ in statement). Then I outlined each letter (more severe, white outline against a black field/background — stars, space, the Dark) and started working each letter of each word into relationship with the others,” she writes in her post.

Rice then took the finished version to Lucas. He had some suggestions. “He looked it over and said, ‘it looks like ”TAR WAR’ and asked me to close-up the loop in the first and last ‘S’ of the title (the title begins and ends with an ‘S’).”

She went back to work, made the revisions, and she adds “that was that.” You may have noticed that the logo as originally submitted is not quite the same as the one we know today.

THR also reports that while Rice didn’t get her name in the opening credits as they’d already been completed, Lucasfilm has acknowledged her work and credited her in an official poster book.

Brinke Guthrie
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Brinke’s favorite toys include his Samsung Galaxy Tab S, Toshiba Chromebook 2, Motorola Moto G4, and two Kindles. A…
What is Apple TV Plus? Price, devices, features, how to get it, and more
The Apple TV+ home screen with an image from Invasion.

Apple TV+ may have only hit the scene in 2019, but it's been going head-to-head with giants like Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Disney+, Max, and Hulu since day one. Unlike it's competitors, it prioritizes exclusive content with a library of originals that have been turning heads with award-winning series like Ted Lasso, Black Bird, For All Mankind, and Severance, alongside sci-fi hits like Silo and Foundation. Oh, and it's also got Major League Baseball and Major League Soccer.

The ad-free video streaming service has amassed an estimated 25 million subscribers globally, with many more than that reportedly cashing in on the company's penchant for offering free promotional subscriptions to those who buy a new Apple device like an iPhone or MacBook.

Read more
One of the year’s best can’t-miss films is finally streaming on Max
Helicopters fly over a military camp in Civil War.

2024 hasn't been a particularly memorable year for movies. Only a few truly great films have hit theaters over the past nine months, and a number of those movies, like Furiosa, haven't had the kind of impact among general viewers that many of their supporters hoped they would. Generally speaking, it's been an unremarkable year for moviegoers with only a handful of films emerging as the kind of rare, distinct spectacles that demand to be seen.

One of those movies, Alex Garland's Civil War, electrified and polarized critics when it was released in April. The film, a dystopian thriller set in a near-future America that has been divided into two warring factions, surprised and disappointed certain viewers with its unexpectedly apolitical approach to its deliberately button-pushing story. Without the baggage of any specific political points of view present to weigh it down, though, Civil War gets to stand on its own terms as an unflinching, utterly gripping war epic.

Read more
15 years ago, this modern masterpiece changed the war movie genre forever
A man smokes in front of a pile of celluloid in Inglourious Basterds.

Quentin Tarantino is a bona fide genre aficionado. Over the course of his 30-year career, the former video store clerk turned world-renowned filmmaker has used his infectious passion for cinema at its most stylized and kooky to reinvent the gangster, crime, samurai, revenge, slasher, Western, and bounty hunter genres. Having spent his first 17 years as a writer-director making genre-bending hits like Reservoir Dogs, Kill Bill, Pulp Fiction, and Jackie Brown, it didn't come as much of a surprise when it was announced that his follow-up to 2007's Death Proof was going to be a World War II thriller in the same vein as classics like The Dirty Dozen, The Great Escape, and The Guns of Navarone. Few could have ever imagined, though, just how thoroughly Tarantino would go on to reinvent the traditional Hollywood war epic.

The resulting film, 2009's Inglourious Basterds, is -- like all of Tarantino's films -- simultaneously a cluster of references and homages to a wide range of 20th-century thrillers both widely esteemed and not and a singular piece of work. It is a thriller of slick style and rock-and-roll verve, and it oozes with the same unbridled, shameless confidence that has long defined Tarantino's work and persona. That confidence burns particularly bright in Inglourious Basterds' stunning finale, in which Tarantino does something that neither he nor anyone else had ever had the guts to do before: He rewrites history and, consequently, ensures that Inglourious Basterds' magic can never be touched or replicated. Fifteen years later, no film has managed to do either.
Setting the stage

Read more