Skip to main content

‘Ready Player One’ review

With ‘Ready Player One,’ Spielberg digs up real feels in a virtual universe

READY PLAYER ONE - Dreamer Trailer [HD]

Nostalgia is a powerful force.

In 2011, a deep-rooted love for our pop-culture past propelled Ernest Cline’s novel Ready Player One onto bestseller lists, and the success of his sci-fi homage to ’80s media eventually put it in the hands of Steven Spielberg, one of Hollywood’s most prolific producers of cinematic nostalgia.

It seemed like the perfect pairing of story and filmmaker, but one question loomed large over the project: Could any director — even a three-time Oscar winner and director of genre-defining classics such as ET and Raiders of the Lost Ark — prevent a Ready Player One movie from collapsing under the weight of its own reverence for, well … just about everything ’80s?

It seemed like the perfect pairing of story and filmmaker.

Directed by Spielberg from a script by Cline and Zak Penn (The Avengers), Ready Player One casts Tye Sheridan (X-Men: Apocalypse) as Wade Watts, a young resident of the Ohio slums in the year 2045 who gets caught up in a race to find the keys to a virtual universe known as OASIS. The treasure hunt pits him against a powerful corporation bent on owning OASIS (and its vast potential to create wealth), and allies him with a mysterious fellow treasure hunter and a group of other colorful heroes in a virtual environment where anything is possible.

In the wrong hands, a big-screen adaptation of the sprawling, fandom-fueled Ready Player One had flop written all over it, but Spielberg has rarely (if ever) been the wrong hands for any project he took on.

Luckily for us, despite the film’s heavy reliance on computer-generated visuals, Spielberg does an amazing job of filling the story’s virtual avatars with as much emotional depth as their live-action counterparts.

Where other films involving virtual universes typically have trouble maintaining the audience’s emotional connection to a character as the story shifts between live-action and virtual elements, Ready Player One makes the transition look easy. Spielberg has always had a deft touch when it comes to forging a relationship between the audience and his characters, human or otherwise, and Ready Player One is a great reminder of how important that skill is for a filmmaker.

There isn’t a single avatar in Ready Player One that feels soulless or robotic.

To that point, there isn’t a single avatar in Ready Player One that feels soulless or robotic, and even the most inhuman-looking avatars of OASIS feel fully inhabited by the human cast portraying them.

What might be an even greater accomplishment, however, is that Spielberg manages to strike a satisfying balance between the more overdone, fandom-fueled elements of Cline’s story and the nostalgia the story is intended to evoke.

Where Cline’s original story seems to be content to occasionally get mired in its own adoration of the ’80s-era touchstones that inspired it, Spielberg and the Ready Player One movie’s creative team wisely avoid getting lost in the weeds by keeping the references more subtle. (Granted, subtlety is relative when adapting a story so deeply rooted in obsessive fandom.)

Devotees of the book need not worry, though, as Wade (and his avatar, Parzival) is still prone to rapid-firing ’80s media references at the slightest provocation. These moments, however, are framed as character-developing scenes in the film rather than the extended dissertations on ’80s-culture minutia that the book provided.

The film’s entire cast gives strong performances as both their human and virtual characters, but it’s Mark Rylance’s portrayal of OASIS creator James Halliday that particularly stands out in Ready Player One. Cline’s novel was ostensibly about Wade discovering Halliday’s deeply personal reasons for creating OASIS, but that aspect of both the character and the story itself is more fully realized in the film due to Rylance’s outstanding performance.

Fans of the novel may be pleasantly surprised by how much they enjoy the film’s willingness to diverge from the source material.

Hardcore loyalists generally don’t have the best reputation when it comes to embracing change — especially when it comes to online discourse — but fans of Cline’s novel may well be pleasantly surprised by how much they enjoy the film’s willingness to diverge from the source material. The script takes Wade, his allies, and his enemies to some places in the pop-culture landscape that weren’t part of the original novel’s narrative, but these alterations end up making the story feel less homogenous in the end.

It was always assumed that the film wouldn’t be able to sample from as many media touchstones as the novel due to the complicated licensing issues that exist for big-screen projects, but Ready Player One casts a surprisingly wide net that should offer a little something for everyone — even if the ’80s weren’t your primary cultural touchstone.

That Spielberg is able to take a story as unwieldy as Cline’s original novel and craft it into something as easily digestible and emotionally resonant as Ready Player One speaks volumes to his still-vibrant talents as a filmmaker.

Ready Player One doesn’t reach enough heights to be considered a cultural touchstone itself, and it doesn’t stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Spielberg’s most iconic films, either, but that shouldn’t detract from its many charms.

Spielberg’s latest cinematic adventure is a fantastic, thrilling, and wonderfully fun film that not only pays satisfying homage to the many works that inspired it, but also tells a compelling story on its own about life, creativity, and the profound impact of the choices we make.

Editors' Recommendations

Rick Marshall
A veteran journalist with more than two decades of experience covering local and national news, arts and entertainment, and…
Tár review: Cate Blanchett soars in Todd Field’s ambitious new drama
Cate Blanchett conducts music while wearing a suit in TÁR.

“Had she said no, the film would never have seen the light of day,” director Todd Field said in a statement about his ambitious new drama, Tár. He was, of course, talking about the film’s star, Cate Blanchett, whose reputation as one of Hollywood’s greatest living actresses certainly precedes her at this point. Despite that fact, it would be easy to initially shrug off Field’s comment as nothing more than a pandering or superficial remark. After all, what director wouldn’t say that about the lead star of their film, especially someone of Blanchett’s caliber?

Having seen Tár, though, the truth of Field’s comment is undeniably clear. In order for it to cast any kind of spell, Tár requires a performer with Blanchett’s charismatic, towering presence. It demands someone who can not only disappear into a character, but who can do so and still be able to command every scene partner who has the misfortune of being pitted against her. Blanchett does that and more in Tár.

Read more
My Best Friend’s Exorcism review: Fighting mean girls (and meaner demons)
Elsie Fisher and Amiah Miller sit on a bed in a scene from My Best Friend's Exorcism.

The teenage years can be scary, even without the threat of demonic possession. Throw a sinister supernatural element into the mix, and the experience becomes, well ... only slightly more terrifying, actually.

That's one takeaway from director Damon Thomas' My Best Friend's Exorcism, which delivers a scary-fun paranormal thriller filtered through a coming-of-age drama about two teenage girls in the 1980s whose lifelong friendship is threatened when one of them becomes the unwilling host of an infernal entity. That this supernatural encounter occurs while the girls are navigating young adulthood turns the typical social hellscape of high school into something more sinister, and tests their friendship in unexpected and terrifying ways.

Read more
Hocus Pocus 2 review: that old black magic, new again
Sarah Jessica Parker, Bette Midler, and Kathy Najimy stand in a convenience store in a scene from Hocus Pocus 2.

Director Kenny Ortega's 1993 film Hocus Pocus wasn't a hit when it was first released, but history has been kind to it, and turned it into a Halloween tradition of sorts for children of a particular generation (and their children, in many cases). And because this is a time when everything old is eventually new again -- particularly if it's gained the sort of post-release popularity Hocus Pocus has enjoyed -- Disney has decided to bring the sorcerous Sanderson sisters back for another adventure in Hocus Pocus 2.

Hocus Pocus 2 conjures up original cast members Bette Midler, Sarah Jessica Parker, and Kathy Najimy as Winifred, Sarah, and Mary Sanderson, respectively, the trio of witches who were accidentally resurrected in the 1993 film and terrorized the town of Salem before being defeated by a group of precocious teenagers and a magical black cat. This time around, the film features Step Up and 27 Dresses director Anne Fletcher behind the camera, and follows another group of Salem teenagers who unwittingly unleash the Sanderson sisters on the town again, 29 years after the events of the original film.

Read more