Skip to main content

30 years ago, a beloved Stephen King adaptation flopped at the box office

Prisoners stand in a prison yard in The Shawshank Redemption.
Columbia Pictures

Stephen King has inspired more Hollywood adaptations of his work than almost any other writer. His novels and short stories served as the source material for some of the most acclaimed and iconic horror movies of the 1970s, ’80s, and ’90s, including Brian De Palma’s Carrie, Stanley Kubrick‘s The Shining, and Rob Reiner’s Misery. Even now, 50 years after the release of his debut novel, King’s work continues to inspire new, high-profile adaptations (see: Mike Flanagan’s Doctor Sleep and Andy Muschietti’s It).

King is inarguably best known as a horror writer. However, one of the most beloved adaptations of his work also happens to be based on one of his more noteworthy non-horror stories. The film in question, The Shawshank Redemption, has found its place among the most popular and well-known movies in Hollywood history. Despite that, it was an infamous box office bomb when it was released in 1994 — grossing only $16 million in its initial theatrical run. More popular releases, like Quentin Tarantino‘s Pulp Fiction, initially overshadowed it that year. Since then, however, The Shawshank Redemption‘s reputation has improved and grown.

Recommended Videos

All it takes is one viewing of the film to understand why.

Not your typical prison movie

Tim Robbins and Morgan Freeman sit on prison bleachers together in The Shawshank Redemption.
Columbia Pictures

Based on a 1982 novella by King, The Shawshank Redemption takes place almost entirely within the confines of its eponymous Maine prison. It follows Andy Dufresne (Tim Robbins), a banker who is sentenced to prison for the murders of his wife and her lover. When he arrives at Shawshank, he quickly makes friends with one of his fellow inmates, Red (Morgan Freeman), and learns to overcome the abuse he initially suffers there by using his education and knowledge of the U.S. financial system to ingratiate himself with not only Shawshank’s other prisoners, but also some of its guards and its warden, Samuel Norton (Bob Gunton).

Clocking in at 142 minutes long, The Shawshank Redemption doesn’t ever rush through Andy’s journey. Writer and director Frank Darabont takes his time immersing the viewer in the social dynamics of Shawshank, its geography, and its power structure. The film’s first 90 minutes are comprised largely of short stories involving Andy and Red that are introduced and then neatly — and sometimes tragically — resolved. It’s not an indulgently long movie, but Darabont crafts it with an understanding that its power is directly dependent on how deeply the viewer feels immersed in Andy’s world. If you don’t, then the setbacks he suffers won’t hurt as deeply as they should, and his victories likewise won’t be nearly as cathartic as they need to be.

Life in Shawshank

Andy Dufresne sits in his cell in The Shawshank Redemption.
Columbia Pictures

To achieve this, Darabont constructs Andy’s life in Shawshank detail by detail — giving items like Andy’s rock hammer, the prison library he helps build, and even the cold beers he wins for his fellow inmates on one particularly hot work day the attention and weight that they deserve. Cinematographer Roger Deakins, meanwhile, helps reinforce how both oppressive and isolating Andy’s time at Shawshank feels. Notice, for instance, how the above shot simultaneously communicates the isolation of Andy’s prison cell and the cold, steel enormity of the system he’s been dropped into. Along the way, as Andy’s various steps forward and back are marked by the beginning and end of multiple self-contained chapters, certain overarching through lines emerge. These include Andy’s seemingly beneficial ,but actually toxic friendship with his warden and the battle between hope and despair that the prisoners of Shawshank must wage every day.

For much of The Shawshank Redemption‘s runtime, it’s unclear what story it’s really telling. At first, it seems like it’s doing nothing more than depicting how one man chooses to spend the second half of his life in prison. That’s where the brilliance of its immensely satisfying third act lies, though. Taking the right cues from its King-penned source material, Darabont’s film pulls off one of the most rewarding left turns in cinema history in its final 30 minutes. It doesn’t cheat to do this, either. Instead, the film simply reveals that all of the details it spends so much of its first two-thirds highlighting actually serve an even greater purpose than viewers initially think. Witnessing how those details come together to form an entirely new, unexpected picture is a pleasure the likes of which is truly rare in cinema history.

Characters you care about

A group of prisoners pose for a picture in The Shawshank Redemption.
Columbia Pictures

None of what it does in its climax would matter, however, if The Shawshank Redemption didn’t do the work to make you truly care about Andy, Red, and the rest of its unlucky inmates. But it does. The film gets you so close to Robbins and Freeman’s beaten-down prisoners that you cannot help but become emotionally invested in their plights. It’s no wonder then why the film has managed over the past 30 years to overcome its initial box office failure and become one of the most revered movies of the 1990s.

In Andy Dufresne, the film takes a person caught in an extremely specific situation and turns him into a symbol of the American everyman. The Shawshank Redemption, in other words, invites viewers to see themselves in Andy and their lives in his. That makes the many injustices he suffers throughout its first two hours hit even harder and closer to home. But Shawshank doesn’t take its viewers’ time or attention for granted, and it rewards those who go into it with open minds and hearts. It does that not only by giving them a cathartic release that is as potent as it is surprising, but also by offering both Andy and them a welcome ray of hope in an otherwise tragic experience — a promise that white beaches and blue seas can be found at the end of even the grayest of stories.

The Shawshank Redemption can be rented or purchased on Amazon Prime Video.

Topics
Alex Welch
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Alex is a writer and critic who has been writing about and reviewing movies and TV at Digital Trends since 2022. He was…
25 years ago, one of the best horror movies ever made became a box office sensation
Three people hang from nooses in The Sixth Sense.

M. Night Shyamalan is best known among moviegoers now as a maker of high-concept, trashy (non-derogatory) genre thrillers, but his reputation has evolved quite a lot throughout his career. For a long time, he was seen as a gimmicky filmmaker — one who relied too much on the kind of third-act, eye-opening twists that had become the biggest talking points of his earliest movies. Viewers began to see him as a one-trick pony and — due to the failures of The Happening, The Last Airbender, and After Earth — not even a particularly good one.

In recent years, however, capably made, uncomfortably gripping films like Trap, Old, Knock at the Cabin, and Split have elevated and deepened his reputation. Now, it seems as though more viewers and critics are willing to recognize him, despite his consistent flaws as a writer, for the high-level, genre-driven visual artist and craftsman that he is. To this day, though, even Shyamalan's biggest defenders don't often tout him as a revolutionary or particularly forward-thinking filmmaker.

Read more
The Boogeyman might prove Stephen King movies are better if they’re based on his short stories
A young girl holding a lamp and looking scared in the movie "The Boogeyman."

The Boogeyman is the latest movie based on the oeuvre of Stephen King. Arguably the most important writer of the 20th century, King is a source of never-ending material for Hollywood, and the notoriously gluttonous town keeps churning movies out of every piece of writing King has ever done. But with most of his major novels and novellas already adapted and remade, Hollywood is turning to his short stories for inspiration.

For The Boogeyman, director Rob Savage uses King's 1973 short story as inspiration. The source material is brief but effective, presenting a well-told and chilling tale of parental doubt and fear disguised as a classic monster story. The adaptation seems to have changed several key aspects -- including the protagonist, the setting, and the core themes. However, it's understandable, especially because the source material is less than 10 pages long and revolves only around two characters. So, changing things to better fit the film medium is likely for the best. And King, master of horror as he may be, is also guilty of going overboard with his premises, especially if given the space to do so, potentially making his short stories better source material for the big-screen treatment than his books.

Read more
Stephen King’s best movies embrace low art
firestarter movie stephen king adaptation reboot

If he's known for one thing, Stephen King is the horror guy. He's the author who wrote Carrie, or It, or The Shining, or any other work you can think of that seems designed to burrow deep into your psyche and discover what scares you most. King is really good at it, too, whether you're more familiar with the books he's written or the movies almost all of them have been turned into.

What's core to King's appeal, though, is that his stories embrace the schlock that is the cornerstone of the horror genre. Christine is a story about a killer car, and while it's also about teenage isolation and a general feeling of purposelessness, it's also very much just about a car that tries to kill people on behalf of its owner. King has never shied away from the pulp inherent in the conceits of his stories, and he recognizes that his readers are so loyal in part because his books are entertaining in addition to whatever hidden meanings they might convey. He grew up reading pulpy paperbacks, and he's just brought his own stylish prose to that same material.

Read more