Kim Dotcom’s online music service Megabox plays legal roulette with its users

megabox roulette header kim dotcomOn Wednesday, renegade entrepreneur Kim Dotcom, founder of file-sharing service Megaupload, accused criminal, and Robin Hood of the Internet, released a preview video of his forthcoming music platform Megabox.

While the details surrounding Megabox are slim, Dotcom explained in a guest blog post on TorrentFreak earlier this year that the service will “allow artists to sell their creations direct to consumers and allowing artists to keep 90 percent of earnings.” Users will have the option to either pay for this music directly, or to download an application called Megakey. Doing so will make all the music “free,” while still generating revenue to pay artists (and Megabox).

“We have a solution called the Megakey that will allow artists to earn income from users who download music for free,” wrote Dotcom. “Yes that’s right, we will pay artists even for free downloads. The Megakey business model has been tested with over a million users and it works. You can expect several Megabox announcements next year including exclusive deals with artists who are eager to depart from outdated business models.”

[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kw04ckfO-yA]

Megakey generates income by replacing about 15 percent of advertisements displayed on Web pages visited by those who have it installed with ads hosted by Megabox. So rather than the website receiving income from these ads, Megabox reaps the rewards. It’s a technique long used in malware. But unlike malware, Megabox users would be consciously choosing to participate in what essentially amounts to a voluntary botnet.

So, how can Megakey possibly be legal? The short answer is that it probably isn’t — and Kim Dotcom’s likely going to get away with it.

Ad blocking goes Mega

A popular way to explain Megakey is to compare it to ad blocker plugins, which are readily available across the Web. After all, Megakey, in a sense, blocks the ads on a website — a functionality that, while controversial, is not clearly illegal. In turn, we more or less stopped debating the legality of ad blockers five years ago. And even though some websites still prohibit the use of these in their terms of service, ad blocker users need not fear lawsuits or night time raids by the FBI.

Of course, Megakey is not only an ad blocker, it’s also an ad giver — a distinction that may make all the difference in the eyes of the courts.

Megakey vs. copyright

Based on what we know about Megakey so far, the most obvious legal buttons the software will likely press appear in the realm of — you guessed it — copyright. Under copyright law, website owners have exclusive rights to their web property. And that means they alone decide how it looks, including which ads display on their Web pages. It is because of this copyright that Megabox may violate a website owner’s intellectual property rights through the use of Megakey.

“As a copyright owner, if Megabox came a long and decided to change up what I had approved of as my website — that includes any third-party advertisements, or approved pop-ups, or whatever — then essentially, I could claim that Megabox infringed on my copyright rights to create my own derivative work,” says Bhaveeni Parmar, an intellectual property attorney based in Dallas, TX. “Because now they’re taking the look of my website and changing it with their own ads without my permission. So they’re changing my derivative work, essentially, which I have the exclusive rights to, not them, unless they ask for my permission before hand.”

dice

The Megabox gamble

Unfortunately for website owners, suing Megabox over this form of copyright infringement may be easier said than done. Unlike a book, movie, or song, a website’s design can change on a regular basis. But in order for a website’s owner to make a substantial copyright infringement claim against Megabox, the owner of the website would have had to register the design of the site with the U.S. Copyright Office within 90 days of its launch.

“Ninety percent of all websites are dynamic, and they change all the time,” says Parmar. “So the odds of [Megabox] hitting a website that registered its design, and its design hasn’t substantially changed from that registration — yeah, [Megabox is] going to play the odds and do very well.”

Where you come in (and lose out)

Now, despite the fact that bringing a valid, substantial copyright infringement claim against Megabox could be extremely difficult, “it’s not impossible,” says Parmar. And if a website is able to make such a claim, users of Megakey could find themselves on the wrong side of the law.

“Say an end consumer downloads [Megakey],” says Parmar. “Now, because of their actions, advertisemts are being deleted. So could they be liable for contributory infringement because they’re allow it to happen because of their actions? That’s a possibility. So not only is it the company that’s doing this, but now it’s the end consumer; they’d be liable for their actions using someone else’s product.”

Legal soup

While Megabox might win on the copyright infringement gamble, other laws might not have the service in their favor. Website owners could potentially go after Megabox on other grounds, including trademark and tort law.

Registered Trademark

Back in 2002, 1-800-Contacts Inc. sued Internet adware company WhenU.com Inc. over something that sounds quite similar to Dotcom’s Megakey idea. WhenU offered a free software bundle called SaveNow. Part of this bundle was a piece of software that would serve users with pop-up ads based on keywords they type in. So when a Web user would search for contact lenses, and land on 1-800-Contacts’ website, WhenU would serve a pop-up for a competing contact lens retailer’s website.

1-800-Contacts claimed WhenU had violated its trademark by including its name in WhenU’s database — a claim upheld by a district court in New York. However, this decision was later thrown out in 2005 — so even here, Megabox may be in the clear. (It must be noted that WhenU and its parent company, Gator/Claria Corporation, have since gone far out of business.)

Another possible problem area for Megakey is what’s known as “tortious interference,” which occurs when a person (or other entity) purposefully damages another person or company’s contractual or business relationships.

So say, for example, that we here at Digital Trends have a business relationship with “Company A,” which has purchased ads on our website. If visitors to Digital Trends are seeing ads for “Company B” due to Megakey, Company A may decide to stop doing business with us. But once again, any website owner who claims that Megabox is screwing up its business dealings on purpose will likely face a tough challenge proving that the disruption was intentional.

A wide range of other factors could add to the legal gray area of Megakey, such as the jurisdictions of laws if Megabox is registered and hosted outside of the United States (as if that’s stopped the feds before…), or the exact functionality of Megakey, which remains unknown.

Moving along

Thanks to the ambiguity surrounding Megabox and Megakey, it’s impossible to say at this moment whether the service violates copyrights or any other U.S. laws — that’s something the courts will have to decide when the time comes. But if it works the way I currently understand it does, then Dotcom is likely far from his last run-in with the courts. Only instead of being attacked by the movie and music industries, he’ll find an enemy in the Web itself.

The next question is, of course, will Web users care whether Megakey violates the copyright of the websites they visit? My guess: Not a chance in hell.

We reached out to Dotcom for comment on this story, but he did not respond to our request. We will update this space if he does.

Images via Sergey Mironov/Eduard Härkönen/Shutterstock

Apple

Your Apple iTunes listening data is only worth about 8 cents, lawsuit claims

Interested in finding out vast amounts of information about what people have been listening to? A recent lawsuit alleges that Apple sold iTunes listener data to third parties, who in turn sell it for only eight cents per person.
Home Theater

Rock out, dance, or just nod along with the best Bluetooth speakers

The market is saturated with wireless audio solutions fit for any and all circumstances. Check out our picks for the best Bluetooth speakers available, whether you'll be listening in the kitchen or on a mountaintop.
Apple

WWDC 2019 Complete Coverage

Apple’s Worldwide Developer Conference is a key tech event each year, and for Apple fans, it will be one of the two best times of 2019 (along with "new iPhone day," of course). For the last few years, Apple has debuted much of its…
Computing

iTunes is dead. Here are the best alternatives to meet your media manager needs

Apple has announced that the next version of MacOS will no longer feature iTunes. If Apple's trio of replacement apps aren't for you, our list of the best iTunes alternatives can help you find the best media management option.
Music

Walmart drops price on this LG wireless portable Bluetooth speaker

Connect to a high-quality portable Bluetooth stereo speaker to elevate your listening engagement and enjoyment. Walmart dropped the price of the LG Music Flow 20-watt portable Bluetooth speaker in time for Father's Day gift shopping.
Home Theater

With U.S. launch of Stations app, Spotify aims to beat Apple to Pandora’s crown

Spotify is the biggest music streaming service globally, but not in the U.S. Enter the stand-alone Stations app: With a stripped-down interface and quick access to music, it might attract plenty of new users.
Home Theater

Shazam on Android no longer needs to hear songs to identify them

A new feature lets Android users give Shazam the ability to listen in on other apps, no microphone required. Called Pop-up Shazam, it can identify tracks even if you've got headphones plugged in. For now, it's an Android exclusive.
Music

How to cancel Pandora Premium on iTunes, Google Play, Roku, and more

Figuring out how to cancel Pandora Premium can be confusing, because how you cancel it all depends on how you signed up in the first place. Once you remember where you got it, canceling your account is easy.
Home Theater

Apple gives Beats Solo3 a fresh paint job, but no new features

If you were hoping that Apple would refresh its aging Beats Solo3 headphones with the H1 chip from the AirPods and PowerBeats Pro, prepare to be disappointed. Instead of new features, the on-ear cans got four new colors.
Home Theater

Cambridge Audio’s earbuds have nearly twice AirPods’ juice for $40 less

Cambridge Audio announced its first pair of true wireless headphones. Called the Melomania 1, the tiny in-ears feature nine hours of battery life, and up to 45 hours with the included charging case.
Home Theater

The best Apple AirPod accessories can extend your high-end earbuds' life span

It might seem a bit strange to buy an accessory for an accessory, but sometimes you need a little something extra, like a case, cover, or transmitter, to get the most out of your Apple AirPods.
Music

The best free music download sites that are totally legal

Finding music that is both free and legal to download can be difficult. We've hand-picked a selection of the best free music download sites for you to legally download your next favorite album.
Music

Radiohead releases 18 hours of material to torpedo hacker’s ransom demand

A hacker who stole 18 hours' worth of unreleased Radiohead recordings was reportedly demanding $150,000 in exchange for its return. But instead of paying up, frontman Thom York and the other band members had a better idea.
Music

Apple Music vs. Spotify: Which service is the streaming king?

Apple Music is giving Spotify a run for its money, but which service is best for you? In our Apple Music vs. Spotify showdown, we compare and contrast all we know about the two streaming music services.