Skip to main content

Court overturns Mirror World’s patent ruling against Apple

A federal judge in Tyler, Texas, has overturned a patent infringement case brought against Apple by Mirror Worlds, vacating a $625.5 million damages ruling against the Cupertino company. The ruling marks a significant victory for Apple, which last October was found to infringe on display technology from Connecticut-based Mirror Worlds in technologies like Spotlight, Time Machine, and Cover Flow. The original case maintained that Apple infringed on three patents, and a jury awarded Mirror Worlds $208.5 million in damages for each patent.

Apple Cover Flow
Image used with permission by copyright holder

According to Bloomberg, U.S. District Judge Leonard Davis did not find that Mirror Worlds was able to substantiate its infringement claims. “Mirror Worlds may have painted an appealing picture for the jury, but it failed to lay a solid foundation sufficient to support important elements it was required to establish under the law,” Davis wrote in his ruling.

Recommended Videos

The case dates back to 2008. Mirror Worlds’ technology surrounds “document streaming,” wherein different types of documents are presented to the users has stacks or piles formed by users’ criteria, and through which users can flip or browse to find what they want. That loosely describes the interface found in Apple’s Cover Flow and Time Machine technologies, as well as Apple’s system-wide Mac OS X search feature Spotlight. Apple challenged the validity of two of the patents, and denied it was infringing in any case.

Neither Apple nor Mirror Worlds have yet had any comment on the ruling.

Although the $625.5 million isn’t a huge penalty to the cash-flush Apple at the moment, getting out from under an infringement ruling does keep the company’s face a little cleaner on the patent infringement front, which may be helpful in terms of public perception as it engages in high-stakes, long-term patent disputes with the likes of HTC and Nokia over smartphone and other technologies.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Topics
This modular Pebble and Apple Watch underdog just smashed funding goals
UNA Watch

Both the Pebble Watch and Apple Watch are due some fierce competition as a new modular brand, UNA, is gaining some serous backing and excitement.

The UNA Watch is the creation of a Scottish company that wants to give everyone modular control of smartwatch upgrades and repairs.

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more
Apple TV+ just got a price slash that’s tough to resist, and it won’t last long
The Apple TV main screen.

Apple has just quietly announced that it will be slashing the price on its Apple TV+ offering for a limited time deal.

While Apple prices the service at a standard $9.99 per month usually, it has just cut that way down to $2.99 per month.

Read more