Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Facebook ad boycotters to Congress: Don’t let Zuckerberg off easy

The organizers of the #StopHateforProfit Facebook ad boycott have written a letter to the House Judiciary Committee asking the members to particularly press Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg about the company’s alleged monopoly over the advertising sphere.

First reported by Axios, the letter suggests several pointed questions that lawmakers could ask: For instance, what percentage of U.S. digital ad spending runs through Facebook and its subsidiaries, what this means for small and medium businesses, and whether there are any alternatives for advertisers to reach certain demographics with the power and efficiency that Facebook uses. The questions seem intended to get at whether Facebook is truly the monopoly it claims not to be.

In June, several hundred major brands, including Coca-Cola, Unilever, and Starbucks, signed on with activist groups led by Common Sense Media, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and the Anti-Defamation League to remove their ads from Facebook for the month of July. This was an attempt, the groups said, the put pressure on Facebook to change its policies about hate speech and misinformation.

However, Facebook has proven resilient against so many big advertisers leaving its platform. Although MarketWatch reported that its stock tanked briefly in June when the boycott was announced, total ad revenue has remained basically steady throughout the boycott, according to Forbes. The social media giant is set to publish its second-quarter earnings report on Thursday, which should show whether the boycott had any kind of major effect on Facebook’s bottom line.

As such, Axios reported, Common Sense Media thinks this suggests a problem with competition in the advertising sphere and has “highlighted how much control Facebook has over online advertising.”

The group is urging committee members to raise the boycott with the Facebook executive when he comes to testify on Wednesday.

Editors' Recommendations

Maya Shwayder
I'm a multimedia journalist currently based in New England. I previously worked for DW News/Deutsche Welle as an anchor and…
What boycott? Facebook earnings unaffected by advertising revolt
mark zuckerberg speaking

Facebook said that despite a very public advertising boycott, the company still plans to hit its revenue goals for the year and will largely be unaffected by the campaign targeting its content moderation policies, according to a second-quarter earnings report released Thursday.

Facebook said that ad revenue growth continued to grow 10% during the first few weeks of July, roughly the same as its pace in the second quarter.

Read more
Big Tech CEOs’ showdown with Congress: The antitrust hearing that wasn’t
Styled Graphic featuring Tim Cook, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Sundar Pichai

All eyes were on Capitol Hill on Wednesday to see if Congress could muster up the focus to figure out whether four of the biggest tech companies of our time were really monopolies. What happened instead was rhetorical chaos and grandstanding.

Whatever hope there might have been that this hearing before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust would be focused and pointed in its questions was quickly dashed: It became clear within minutes that the members of Congress would take their time to ask more or less whatever they wanted of the four tech titans assembled before them.

Read more
Zuckerberg to tell Congress that Instagram, WhatsApp needed Facebook to succeed
Zuckerberg Testimony Congress

Facebook founder and chief executive Mark Zuckerberg plans to tell Congress Wednesday in a highly anticipated antitrust hearing that Instagram and WhatsApp, both owned by the company, would not have been able to succeed without his company's resources, according to a report in CNBC.

“Facebook has made Instagram and WhatsApp successful as part of our family of apps,” Zuckerberg said in a prepared statement -- which was first obtained by The New York Times.

Read more