Skip to main content

GOP senators want to make it easier to sue tech companies for bias

Republican senators introduced a new proposal on Wednesday that would limit protections of Section 230 for social media platforms. 

The bill, called Limiting Section 230 Immunity to Good Samaritans Act, would make social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter undertake a “duty of good faith” before receiving any protections from Section 230, Axios first reported. 

The proposed bill would allow users who don’t believe that a platform is “operating in good faith” by being inconsistent and unfair with what content is acceptable or taken down to sue these companies for $5,000 plus attorneys’ fees. 

Platforms with more than 30 million U.S. users per month and more than $1.5 billion in global revenue would be subject to the bill. This means Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, and other popular social networks would have to comply with the new limitations. 

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.), and Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) sponsored the bill. 

“For too long, Big Tech companies like Twitter, Google, and Facebook have used their power to silence political speech from conservatives without any recourse for users,” Hawley said in an official statement. “Section 230 has been stretched and rewritten by courts to give these companies outlandish power over speech without accountability. Congress should act to ensure bad actors are not given a free pass to censor and silence their opponents.”

Twitter told Digital Trends that they have nothing to share about their thoughts on the proposal. Digital Trends reached out to Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube for comment on the reported bill. We’ll update this story when we hear back.

Currently, Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act protects websites from being liable in court for the content that their users post.

Section 230 says: “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.”

President Donald Trump signed an executive order last month pushing to revise Section 230 to strip those protections after Twitter attached a fact-check message to Trump’s tweet about how a mail-in ballot system would promote voter fraud. Critics saw the move as retaliation and an attempt to strong-arm tech companies.

Editors' Recommendations

Allison Matyus
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Allison Matyus is a general news reporter at Digital Trends. She covers any and all tech news, including issues around social…
6 Twitter features I want no matter who’s in charge
The Twitter app on the Sony XPeria 5 II.

Amid all of the chaos surrounding Elon Musk's bid to buy Twitter, I can't help but wonder what Twitter will look like when the dust settles and we find out who takes over or remains in control.

And while we can't quite predict what the wildly popular social networking app would look like if Musk successfully buys the company and takes it private, I do know what changes I'd like to see happen regardless of who ends up in charge of that terrible, amazing bird app.
An edit button

Read more
What is Section 230? Inside the legislation protecting social media
social media on phone

A little known piece of legislation called Section 230 is making headlines after President Donald Trump's latest effort to repeal the legislation, demanding that Congress fold that repeal in with another round of stimulus checks, defense spending, and the massive bill that keeps the lights on in Washington D.C. It seems politicians are alwasy struggling to wrap their heads around social media and "Big Tech," a silly term for the technology giants that have defined the modern era.

It's not the first time Section 230 made waves, of course. Trump signed an executive order in May that targeted social media platforms and the content on their sites, aiming to remove the protections of Section 230 in the Communications Decency Act. By repealing Section 230, social networks would be legally responsible for what people post on their platforms. The law that protects speech over the internet has been around for more than 20 years, but has been targeted by politicians of both major parties, including Democratic president-elect Joe Biden.

Read more
DOJ proposes legislation to gut Big Tech’s legal shield
disabled activists organize online social media

The Department of Justice (DOJ) unveiled legislation to radically reform Section 230 on Wednesday, September 23, which would strip many of the legal protections social media platforms and tech companies now have by making them liable for users' posts.

While the legislation is just a draft, the DOJ's suggestions focus on narrowing the criteria online platforms would need to meet to have liability protections and establish what type, if any, immunity platforms get for specific cases, according to CNBC.

Read more