Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Cars
  3. News

Uber says drivers aren’t an essential part of its business

Add as a preferred source on Google

Uber’s top lawyer said it would not comply with a California bill that would force it to treat its contract drivers as employees, claiming that drivers are not a core part of the company’s business.

Speaking on a conference call on Wednesday, Uber chief legal officer Tony West pushed back against the newly passed Assembly Bill 5 (AB5), which will require app-based companies in the gig economy to reclassify their workers as regular employees.

Recommended Videos

West said the company doesn’t plan to make the change when the law goes into effect, essentially saying that drivers would remain independent contractors. The bill established what’s called the ABC test to determine who should be classified as an employee, and West says Uber drivers don’t qualify since they aren’t essential to the business.

“Under that three-part test, arguably the highest bar is that a company must prove that contractors are doing work ‘outside the usual course’ of its business,” he said. ”Several previous rulings have found that drivers’ work is outside the usual course of Uber’s business, which is serving as a technology platform for several different types of digital marketplaces.”

AB5, which is expected to be signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom, will go into effect on January 1, 2020, and will enable workers to have basic protections afforded to employees, including minimum wage requirements, health benefits, and Social Security contributions.

Uber Chief Legal Officer Tony West
Uber chief legal officer Tony West. Image used with permission by copyright holder

West seemed to claim that Uber isn’t a ridesharing platform at all. We contacted Uber to see if it could give additional context on West’s comments and will update this story if we hear back.

Uber, Lyft, and other gig-based companies with huge legal muscle are likely to challenge the bill, which could fundamentally change the way they do business. Despite West’s insistence that drivers aren’t all important to Uber, the law might mean huge changes for the drivers themselves. They might need to work in shifts instead of whenever they want, or even only be able to work for one app at a time instead of multiple services.

“There would be real changes in the way that drivers interact with the platform, and based on what drivers tell us, they are not changes that they would welcome,” West said.

It’s long been speculated that Uber’s endgame is to get rid of drivers altogether. The company has invested major money into its self-driving car program, known as the Advanced Technology Group. While the company experienced a major setback when one of Uber’s self-driving cars struck and killed a pedestrian in Arizona in March of 2018. The company has since relaunched its self-driving car tests in three cities.

Mathew Katz
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Mathew is a news editor at Digital Trends, specializing in covering all kinds of tech news — from video games to policy. He…
Tesla has a battery theft problem
Even Tesla's batteries can't wait to hit the road
Tesla cars at Superchargers

Tesla is facing an unusual security problem in the US, and it is happening before many of its batteries even make it onto the road. According to an investigation by WIRED, multiple truckloads of Tesla batteries have allegedly been stolen directly from the company's Nevada Gigafactory, highlighting a growing wave of organised cargo theft targeting high-value technology shipments.

Cargo theft is becoming a serious problem for Tesla

Read more
Tesla’s arch rival has already won at charging tech. Now, it’s testing a self-driving breakthrough
Transportation, Vehicle, Car

BYD has made no secret of its ambition to build more of its own technology. That includes everything from batteries to electric motors, and now even the AI chips that power advanced driver assistance systems. But despite all that momentum, the company’s latest move suggests it’s not ready to cut ties with outside chipmakers just yet. Instead, BYD appears to be taking the practical route.

A smart detour before the destination

Read more
Polestar forced to exit the US market. It’s a shame we won’t see its refined design anymore
Boring EVs caught a break as Americans lose Polestar
polestar-3-ev

Polestar, the Swedish EV brand controlled by China’s Geely, has been denied authorization under the US Connected Vehicle Rule. As a result, it will not be able to sell vehicles in the US from the 2027 model year onward. The company is not disappearing from American roads overnight. Polestar says it will continue selling existing US inventory of the Polestar 3 and Polestar 4, and current owners will still have access to service support. But for future models, the door is effectively closing unless something changes.

Polestar 3

Read more