Skip to main content

Uber investigators were forbidden from reporting criminal allegations to police

A new report reveals that Uber’s internal investigation team that handles customer complaints of crimes like sexual assault and rape is “forbidden” from reporting allegations against drivers to authorities. 

The Washington Post reports that Uber uses a three-strike system for its drivers and won’t remove them as a driver from the platform unless they get three strikes for “bad behavior.” Even still, when a driver is kicked off the platform, Uber doesn’t necessarily let local authorities, other rideshare companies, or background check firms know the driver’s behavior that provoked their removal. 

The agents are forbidden by Uber from routing allegations to police or from advising victims to seek legal counsel or make their own police reports, even when they get confessions of felonies, said Lilli Flores, a former investigator in Phoenix — a guideline corroborated in interviews with investigators, alleged victims and plaintiffs’ attorneys.

The Post report also says an Uber executive overruled an investigator trying to remove an Uber driver in New York who allegedly had three separate complaints of sexual advances toward passengers against him. The driver in question continued driving for Uber until a fourth complaint was made by a passenger who said the driver raped her. 

According to Uber’s Law Enforcement Guidelines, under Emergency and Exigent requests, Uber says: “We require a description of the nature of the emergency or urgency, including details about the nature of the alleged actual or threatened physical harm or exigency, and we review these requests on a case-by-case basis. We may provide responsive information when we have a good faith belief that doing so may protect riders, driver-partners, others, Uber, or otherwise assist with an exigent investigation.”

Uber’s guidelines go on to say: “Once the emergency or exigency has passed, we require law enforcement to follow up with the appropriate legal process and we may require law enforcement to obtain appropriate legal process for any initial or additional disclosure.” 

Digital Trends reached out to Uber to comment on the allegations regarding the investigations team and Uber told us that they were proud of the team’s work.

“We’ve made substantial investments in both the SIU team and in our safety technology, policies and processes. We are very proud of this team’s work and know they approach their jobs with tremendous compassion and understanding. Characterizing this team as anything but providing support to people after a difficult experience is just wrong. We will continue to put safety at the heart of everything we do and implement new approaches, based on expert guidance, to the benefit of both our customers and employees,” an Uber spokesperson told Digital Trends.

Uber also added that they continually enhance the team by hiring experienced specialists from diverse backgrounds such as social services, crisis management and law enforcement.

Ridesharing companies’ handling of passengers’ safety has come into question as more allegedvictims are coming forward to share their experiences of sexual assault. Earlier this month, 14 women filed a lawsuit against Uber’s competitor, Lyft. The women allege that the company doesn’t do enough to protect female passengers and has failed to cooperate with law enforcement. 

According to 2018 data from CNN covering a four-year period, 18 Lyft drivers in the U.S. faced accusations of sexual assault, with four drivers having been convicted. Uber saw 103 of its U.S.-based drivers accused of sexual assault during the same time frame, with 31 convicted.

Attorney Stephen Estey, who is representing the group of women suing Lyft, said in a press conference on September 4 it’s possible that at some point, they will file a lawsuit against Uber for sexual assault cases as well. 

Editors' Recommendations

Allison Matyus
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Allison Matyus is a general news reporter at Digital Trends. She covers any and all tech news, including issues around social…
Uber and Lyft might adopt a franchise business model in California
Uber

Uber and Lyft are reportedly considering adopting a franchise model in California as an alternative to having to classify their contracted drivers as full-time employees. 

The New York Times reports that both ridesharing companies are “seriously discussing” licensing out their brands to vehicle fleet operators in a franchise-like model. The new business model results from the companies trying to dodge a gig economy law that requires app-based companies to categorize contractors the same as regular employees. 

Read more
Uber might shut down its app in California over how employees are classified
An Uber App on a smartphone.

Uber may shut down its app in California for “several months” if the company has to classify drivers as independent workers. 

Following a preliminary injunction granted on Monday that requires Uber and Lyft to stop classifying their drivers in California as contractors instead of employees by next week, Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi, said that the app would have to be shut down there as a result. 

Read more
‘No mask, no ride’: Uber extends face-covering requirement indefinitely
A driver wearing a face mask.

Uber is doubling down on its mask-wearing rule by extending the requirement indefinitely for rides in the U.S. and Canada.

The rule, which came into force in May 2020 due to the coronavirus pandemic, had been set to stay effective until the end of June. But with infection rates on the rise in numerous states across the U.S., the company now says riders and drivers must wear a face-covering during trips until further notice.

Read more