Uber might shut down its app in California over how employees are classified

By Allison Matyus Published August 12, 2020

Uber may shut down its app in California for “several months” if the company has to classify drivers as independent workers.

Following a preliminary injunction granted on Monday that requires Uber and Lyft to stop classifying their drivers in California as contractors instead of employees by next week, Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi, said that the app would have to be shut down there as a result.

Recommended Videos

“If the court doesn’t reconsider, then in California, it’s hard to believe we’ll be able to switch our model to full-time employment quickly,” Khosrowshahi said during a Wednesday interview on MSNBC.

Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi — Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

The two companies have one week to appeal the preliminary injunction, which both have said they plan to do, according to CNBC. The new order would require Uber and Lyft to treat their California drivers as employees, including providing benefits and insurance.

The preliminary injunction resulted from a lawsuit California Attorney General Xavier Becerra filed against the ridesharing apps in May over their alleged misclassification of their workers as independent contractors instead of as employees. The lawsuit seeks up to $2,500 for each violation, and a permanent halt to misclassifying drivers and civil penalties that could reach up to the hundreds of millions of dollars.

Last September, a new gig economy law called Assembly Bill 5 was passed in California that requires app-based companies to treat their contractors the same way they treat regular employees. Under the new law, contractors are eligible for basic protections like minimum-wage requirements, health benefits, and Social Security.

Both Uber and Lyft have been vocal about their opposition to the bill, and even joined forces with DoorDash in August 2019 on a $90 million ballot initiative to exempt them from Assembly Bill 5. Assembly Bill 5 officially went into law on January 1.

Digital Trends reached out to Uber to comment on Khosrowshahi’s interview. We also reached out to Lyft to see if it would also shut down its app in California. We will update this story when we hear back.

Topics

Former Digital Trends Contributor

Allison Matyus is a general news reporter at Digital Trends. She covers any and all tech news, including issues around social…

Mobile

Google just gave vision to AI, but it’s still not available for everyone

Gemini Live App on the Galaxy S25 Ultra broadcast to a TV showing the Gemini app with the camera feature open

Google has just officially announced the roll out of a powerful Gemini AI feature that means the intelligence can now see.

This started in March as Google began to show off Gemini Live, but it's now become more widely available.

Mobile

This modular Pebble and Apple Watch underdog just smashed funding goals

UNA Watch

Both the Pebble Watch and Apple Watch are due some fierce competition as a new modular brand, UNA, is gaining some serous backing and excitement.

The UNA Watch is the creation of a Scottish company that wants to give everyone modular control of smartwatch upgrades and repairs.

Cars

Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues

Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”