Opinion: Microsoft should be backing Android. Here’s why

opinion microsoft should be backing android heres why header finalMicrosoft is all about profit right? Just like any other successful tech company, Microsoft executives are always looking for new ways to rake in the cash and they’re good at it too. From software to hardware, for businesses and consumers, Microsoft has expanded to cover a lot of bases. When it comes to the mobile market, that success has proven more elusive, until now. Before you spray your coffee across the monitor (or touchscreen) in disbelief, I should make it clear that I’m not talking about Windows Phone, I’m talking about Android.

Back in September of 2011 Goldman Sachs analysts caused a furor when they suggested that Microsoft could earn $444 million between June 2011 and June 2012 from Android licensing agreements, as reported by Business Insider. At the time, Microsoft had settled with a few companies using Android, most notably Samsung and HTC. Since then, it has secured deals with many others including LG and most recently Pegatron, a Taiwanese manufacturer that supplies parts to Apple, Asus and HP. The vast majority of Android devices being sold in the U.S. now turn a profit for Microsoft.

The exact details of the licensing agreements are never revealed, but looking at Barnes & Noble complaints during its legal battle with Microsoft, the fees demanded for Android licensing may have been increasing. That Goldman estimate was based on licensing fees of between $3 to $6 per device, but the actual fees agreed in some cases could be much higher. Barnes & Noble claims Microsoft demanded “shockingly high” fees. As more and more licensing agreements have been reached and the courts have found no wrong doing, Microsoft’s bargaining position has strengthened significantly.

What about Windows Phone? It’s no secret that Microsoft’s mobile platform hasn’t set the world on fire. Despite predictions about it taking off this year, it really hasn’t. A recent report from Gartner shows a 56.1 percent market share of smartphone sales for Android compared to 1.9 percent for Microsoft. That actually represents a decline for Microsoft from 2.6 percent last year. We can probably attribute a lot of that to the death of Windows Mobile, but there’s no hiding the fact that Windows Phone is way behind the competition and doesn’t look like it’s catching up.

Now consider that the Windows Phone partnership with Nokia will also cost the company billions of dollars, according to Nokia. In fact, Nokia’s fourth quarter 2011 financials showed a payment of $250 million for “platform support” and it’s doubtful that Nokia pay anywhere near as much as other licensees. A whopping $27 is the average figure that ZTE pays per Windows Phone device it produces, according to their UK Portfolio Manager Santiago Sierra.

It’s hard to believe that Microsoft earns anywhere near as much from Windows Phone as it does from Android. In fact, it looks as though Microsoft earns more from the Android OS than Google does. If profit is the bottom line then Microsoft should be backing Android, right?

In reality, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer has repeatedly criticized Google’s mobile platform. He claims that Windows Phone will prevail because it is easier to use, but consumers clearly don’t agree. It now looks as though Ballmer is betting the future of Microsoft on Windows 8. The Windows 8 platform will offer a consistent experience across devices, from your PC to your tablet to your smartphone. Is that really what people want? A touchscreen user interface foisted on their desktops in the name of consistency? Only time will tell.

Having already poured so much into Windows Phone, you can understand why Microsoft can’t pull out now, but ploughing on with a losing proposition simply because you have over invested is the downfall of many gamblers. The idea that Windows 8 will be a great success seems like wishful thinking. Windows 8 seems to be primarily targeting tablets, to the detriment of desktop computers. That puts Microsoft into the ring with Apple, whose iPad overwhelmingly dominates the tablet market. It won’t be easy to muscle in, and manufacturers already struggling to make a mark with Android tablets will need good incentives to dabble in Windows 8.

It seems to me that Microsoft has spent an awful lot of money already trying to make Windows Phone into a credible competitor for Android and iOS, and the whole exercise has been a miserable failure. Was Windows Phone simply too late to the market? Did it fail to inspire manufacturers because of strict restrictions on device specs and high licensing fees? Did it fail to inspire app and game developers because of a tiny user base? Yes, yes and yes. The reasons don’t even matter anymore, because the cold, hard truth for Microsoft is that Windows Phone continues to be outsold by Android and iOS.

I guess the only silver lining is that the Android licensing deals can pay for Microsoft’s efforts to promote Windows Phone. It seems somehow perverse to fund your platform by profiting from your competitor’s platform, and it seems churlish to keep criticising them while you do it. Does it even make business sense? I don’t think it does.

If Microsoft had cut its losses and backed Android instead of doing the Nokia deal, the company would be in a much stronger position now. By focussing on Android licensing deals, developing apps and games for the platform and maybe even launching a rival store for Google Play, Microsoft could have secured a big piece of a giant cake, instead of a whole tiny cake. Amazon’s foray into the Android ecosystem shows that Google’s hold on the platform is far from absolute. Maybe Microsoft could have usurped it and integrated its own services. Why not take the patent trolling one step further and just claim the platform as its own?

Microsoft’s attitude toward Android has more to do with its war on Google. It’s a war of attrition on multiple fronts, and it doesn’t serve either company well.

The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not reflect the beliefs of Digital Trends.

Computing

iTunes had to die to be reborn, and it’s making me nostalgic

Apple’s decision to kill off iTunes-as-we-know-it, as announced during WWDC 2019, makes me nostalgic because I still rely on iTunes today for the same reason it was created back in 2001.
Computing

How the Mac Pro’s modular internals prophesy a new future for PC design

Apple's new Mac Pro is here and it looks set to offer video editors a perfect blend of sheer power and expansive expandability. But what if the changes in Apple's new system bleed through into the PC industry as a whole?
Computing

The new Mac Pro was the only way to save the Mac from the iPad’s killing blow

The Mac Pro and the iPad were in the spotlight this year at WWDC 2019. Why? Well, the two products paint an interesting picture about the future of both platforms and where Apple is headed with them.
Mobile

As Google keeps racing ahead, where is Apple’s A.I. strategy?

The contrast between Google’s I/O developer conference and Apple’s WWDC on the topic of artificial intelligence is stark, but what does it mean? We take a look at how Apple has fallen behind and what it might do to catch up.
Movies & TV

Why choose? Disney Plus and Netflix are the peanut butter and jelly of streaming

Instead of debating which streaming video service is better, we should instead be talking about how Netflix and Disney Plus are two equally great and totally different streaming options that will go even better together.
Gaming

Google Stadia’s platform for everyone promise is already broken

Google Stadia, the upcoming cloud gaming service, pitches itself on accessibility. It's a platform for everyone, playable on any screen. Except that's not quite true. Stadia has many restrictions, terms, and conditions.
Mobile

Sign In with Apple sticks it to Google and Facebook, for the good of everyone

Apple wants you to use its new Sign In with Apple service, which promises to free you from password hell, without selling your soul to the advertising devil. Is it worth using when it launches this year?
Features

Orwell’s 1984 was nothing like actual 1984. But it’s exactly like 2019

70 years ago today, George Orwell published 1984: a dystopian novel that sat squarely in the realm of fiction at the time it was published. Today, however, the book is an astonishingly accurate depiction of the world we live in now -- and…
Gaming

Microsoft's Xbox Project Scarlett console is awesome, and it doesn't matter

Microsoft has set a release date for Project Scarlett, its next-generation game console. It promises incredible performance, stunning 8K visuals, and lightning-quick load times -- but none of that matters. The console's relevance is waning.
Cars

BMW’s i8 Roadster is the Mazda Miata of hybrids. And I mean that in a good way

The i8 Roadster is not best in class for power, speed, or outright abilities. What is does offer is some of the best driving fun for the money. Sounds exactly like the Mazda MX-5 Miata to us.
Gaming

Ubisoft says its games ignore politics. So why are they so political?

Prior to E3, Ubisoft reiterated again that it doesn't make political statements in games. At its press conference, however, we saw previews of Watch Dogs Legion and Ghost Recon Blackpoint that suggest otherwise.
Computing

The true advantage of AMD’s next-gen chips isn’t power, it’s platforms

AMD announced some impressive new processors and GPUs at E3 this week, with plenty of muscle to flex. But the real strength of AMD in the future isn't its power or even its price. It's cross-platform scalability.
Computing

I bought a four-year-old MacBook Pro instead of a new one. Here’s why

The new MacBook Pros have a ton of advantages over the older options, but when it came to buying a replacement machine for myself, I found myself returning to 2015 rather than picking up Apple's latest and greatest.
Opinion

Tim Cook said Silicon Valley built a chaos factory. Are Apple’s hands clean?

The King of Silicon Valley just called it a “chaos factory.” Giving a commencement speech at Stanford University, Apple CEO Tim Cook criticized his fellow tech giants for disregarding the privacy of their customers.