Objection! The Supreme Court needs to understand email

tobjection the supreme court needs to understand email

Last week, the Associated Press published what may, in fact, be the understatement of the century: The justices of the Supreme Court of the United States “have a ways to go to understand technology.”

This is based on what the news agency learned from Justice Elena Kagan, who told the audience at an event in Rhode Island last Tuesday that she and her colleagues have not yet begun to use email, at least in a professional capacity.

I don’t fault them for skipping the Google Glass Explorers bandwagon, or failing to have a Bitcoin wallet.

“The justices are not necessarily the most technologically sophisticated people,” said Kagan. “The court hasn’t really ‘gotten to’ email.”

Instead, reports the AP, the justices “communicate with one another through memos printed on ivory paper.” And the memos are passed from one justice to another with the help of people professional titled “chamber aides.” 

Now, nobody’s saying SCOTUS justices need to be early adopters. I don’t fault them for skipping the Google Glass Explorers bandwagon, or failing to have a Bitcoin wallet. But I think we can all agree that the people in our government, from the Supreme Court on down, need to understand the technology most people use, and how that technology fits into our lives in an intimate way.

This is especially true for Supreme Court justices, who are tasked with interpreting the laws of our land – laws that are increasingly intertwined with the technology we use and need to live our lives. 

Supreme Court Building

One day, for example, we may find SCOTUS considering whether or not the Fourth Amendment should apply to the content we share and the messages we send via social networks – a question that, as I’ve previously reported, is very much up in the air. Privacy rights, surveillance activities, copyright issues, free speech online, video game violence, and Internet freedom – all of this and more will come before the Supreme Court, and they will have the final word on how our society treats these issues.

The fact that they don’t use Facebook, while understandable, is just not okay.

The same goes for Congress, the people who make up our laws in the first place. As we saw during the debate over the Stop Online Privacy Act in late 2011 and early 2012, most Members simply don’t understand the technical aspects of the Web, causing them to write bills that put the technologies on which we rely in danger.

Granted, I can’t claim to understand all the technical aspects of the Web either, nor, I presume, can the majority of people who use them. So I empathize with SCOTUS justices and Members of Congress who are in over their heads when it comes to this technology stuff. Nobody expects every person nominated for the highest court in the land or elected to Congress to have computer science degrees (and law degrees), or be well-versed in the ways of Snapchat.

Without at least some long-term, first-hand experience with tech, informed decisions by the court are virtually impossible to achieve.

That said, there is a big difference between not understanding all the complicated technical aspects of how an email is sent and not understanding how integral email is to most people’s lives. (Though, in some cases, how email works on a technical level is quite important, too.) It is the nitty-gritty aspects of how real people use technology in real life that should inform the courts and lawmakers about how to address laws that affect technology. And without at least some long-term, first-hand experience with tech, such informed decisions are virtually impossible to achieve.

To the justice’s credit, they occasionally seek the help of court clerks, who are often younger and more experienced with modern tech, to gain some insight. Once, according to Kagan, the justices even got some hands-on time with video games, as the court considered the violence often depicted in games. “It was kind of hilarious,” she said.

Hey, that’s at least something, I suppose. But until those at the highest echelons of government climb down from their ivory paper towers, and really learn how important and nuanced technology is in the lives of everyday people, our technology laws will remain stuck in an era when titles like “chamber aide” didn’t sound so ridiculous. 

Supreme Court image courtesy of Gary Blakeley/Shutterstock

The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not reflect the beliefs of Digital Trends.


iTunes had to die to be reborn, and it’s making me nostalgic

Apple’s decision to kill off iTunes-as-we-know-it, as announced during WWDC 2019, makes me nostalgic because I still rely on iTunes today for the same reason it was created back in 2001.

How the Mac Pro’s modular internals prophesy a new future for PC design

Apple's new Mac Pro is here and it looks set to offer video editors a perfect blend of sheer power and expansive expandability. But what if the changes in Apple's new system bleed through into the PC industry as a whole?

The new Mac Pro was the only way to save the Mac from the iPad’s killing blow

The Mac Pro and the iPad were in the spotlight this year at WWDC 2019. Why? Well, the two products paint an interesting picture about the future of both platforms and where Apple is headed with them.

As Google keeps racing ahead, where is Apple’s A.I. strategy?

The contrast between Google’s I/O developer conference and Apple’s WWDC on the topic of artificial intelligence is stark, but what does it mean? We take a look at how Apple has fallen behind and what it might do to catch up.
Movies & TV

Why choose? Disney Plus and Netflix are the peanut butter and jelly of streaming

Instead of debating which streaming video service is better, we should instead be talking about how Netflix and Disney Plus are two equally great and totally different streaming options that will go even better together.

Google Stadia’s platform for everyone promise is already broken

Google Stadia, the upcoming cloud gaming service, pitches itself on accessibility. It's a platform for everyone, playable on any screen. Except that's not quite true. Stadia has many restrictions, terms, and conditions.

Sign In with Apple sticks it to Google and Facebook, for the good of everyone

Apple wants you to use its new Sign In with Apple service, which promises to free you from password hell, without selling your soul to the advertising devil. Is it worth using when it launches this year?

Orwell’s 1984 was nothing like actual 1984. But it’s exactly like 2019

70 years ago today, George Orwell published 1984: a dystopian novel that sat squarely in the realm of fiction at the time it was published. Today, however, the book is an astonishingly accurate depiction of the world we live in now -- and…

Microsoft's Xbox Project Scarlett console is awesome, and it doesn't matter

Microsoft has set a release date for Project Scarlett, its next-generation game console. It promises incredible performance, stunning 8K visuals, and lightning-quick load times -- but none of that matters. The console's relevance is waning.

BMW’s i8 Roadster is the Mazda Miata of hybrids. And I mean that in a good way

The i8 Roadster is not best in class for power, speed, or outright abilities. What is does offer is some of the best driving fun for the money. Sounds exactly like the Mazda MX-5 Miata to us.

Ubisoft says its games ignore politics. So why are they so political?

Prior to E3, Ubisoft reiterated again that it doesn't make political statements in games. At its press conference, however, we saw previews of Watch Dogs Legion and Ghost Recon Blackpoint that suggest otherwise.

The true advantage of AMD’s next-gen chips isn’t power, it’s platforms

AMD announced some impressive new processors and GPUs at E3 this week, with plenty of muscle to flex. But the real strength of AMD in the future isn't its power or even its price. It's cross-platform scalability.

I bought a four-year-old MacBook Pro instead of a new one. Here’s why

The new MacBook Pros have a ton of advantages over the older options, but when it came to buying a replacement machine for myself, I found myself returning to 2015 rather than picking up Apple's latest and greatest.

Tim Cook said Silicon Valley built a chaos factory. Are Apple’s hands clean?

The King of Silicon Valley just called it a “chaos factory.” Giving a commencement speech at Stanford University, Apple CEO Tim Cook criticized his fellow tech giants for disregarding the privacy of their customers.