Objection! The Supreme Court needs to understand email

tobjection the supreme court needs to understand email

Last week, the Associated Press published what may, in fact, be the understatement of the century: The justices of the Supreme Court of the United States “have a ways to go to understand technology.”

This is based on what the news agency learned from Justice Elena Kagan, who told the audience at an event in Rhode Island last Tuesday that she and her colleagues have not yet begun to use email, at least in a professional capacity.

I don’t fault them for skipping the Google Glass Explorers bandwagon, or failing to have a Bitcoin wallet.

“The justices are not necessarily the most technologically sophisticated people,” said Kagan. “The court hasn’t really ‘gotten to’ email.”

Instead, reports the AP, the justices “communicate with one another through memos printed on ivory paper.” And the memos are passed from one justice to another with the help of people professional titled “chamber aides.” 

Now, nobody’s saying SCOTUS justices need to be early adopters. I don’t fault them for skipping the Google Glass Explorers bandwagon, or failing to have a Bitcoin wallet. But I think we can all agree that the people in our government, from the Supreme Court on down, need to understand the technology most people use, and how that technology fits into our lives in an intimate way.

This is especially true for Supreme Court justices, who are tasked with interpreting the laws of our land – laws that are increasingly intertwined with the technology we use and need to live our lives. 

Supreme Court Building

One day, for example, we may find SCOTUS considering whether or not the Fourth Amendment should apply to the content we share and the messages we send via social networks – a question that, as I’ve previously reported, is very much up in the air. Privacy rights, surveillance activities, copyright issues, free speech online, video game violence, and Internet freedom – all of this and more will come before the Supreme Court, and they will have the final word on how our society treats these issues.

The fact that they don’t use Facebook, while understandable, is just not okay.

The same goes for Congress, the people who make up our laws in the first place. As we saw during the debate over the Stop Online Privacy Act in late 2011 and early 2012, most Members simply don’t understand the technical aspects of the Web, causing them to write bills that put the technologies on which we rely in danger.

Granted, I can’t claim to understand all the technical aspects of the Web either, nor, I presume, can the majority of people who use them. So I empathize with SCOTUS justices and Members of Congress who are in over their heads when it comes to this technology stuff. Nobody expects every person nominated for the highest court in the land or elected to Congress to have computer science degrees (and law degrees), or be well-versed in the ways of Snapchat.

Without at least some long-term, first-hand experience with tech, informed decisions by the court are virtually impossible to achieve.

That said, there is a big difference between not understanding all the complicated technical aspects of how an email is sent and not understanding how integral email is to most people’s lives. (Though, in some cases, how email works on a technical level is quite important, too.) It is the nitty-gritty aspects of how real people use technology in real life that should inform the courts and lawmakers about how to address laws that affect technology. And without at least some long-term, first-hand experience with tech, such informed decisions are virtually impossible to achieve.

To the justice’s credit, they occasionally seek the help of court clerks, who are often younger and more experienced with modern tech, to gain some insight. Once, according to Kagan, the justices even got some hands-on time with video games, as the court considered the violence often depicted in games. “It was kind of hilarious,” she said.

Hey, that’s at least something, I suppose. But until those at the highest echelons of government climb down from their ivory paper towers, and really learn how important and nuanced technology is in the lives of everyday people, our technology laws will remain stuck in an era when titles like “chamber aide” didn’t sound so ridiculous. 

Supreme Court image courtesy of Gary Blakeley/Shutterstock

The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not reflect the beliefs of Digital Trends.


Midrange phones can’t do A.I., but MediaTek’s P90 chip aims to change that

MediaTek has announced the Helio P90 mobile processor, which it says will bring the best A.I. features we see on high-end smartphones, to the mid-range. We spoke to the company about the chip.
Product Review

The Black Shark gaming phone takes a big bite out of your free time, but the software sinks it

The world is being treated to an ever-increasing number of high-powered gaming phones. With so many great options already out, is there room for another? The Black Shark thinks so. But is it any good? We find out.
Digital Trends Live

Twitch streamer Fuslie gives a glimpse of her life and future plans

Today, we welcomed Twitch streamer Fuslie to talk about how her career goals shifted from becoming a veterinarian to a full-time streamer. Also, she shared what her future plans are for streaming and created content.

Car-branded phones need to make a U-turn if they ever want to impress

Your car and your smartphone are becoming one, yet smartphones branded or co-created by car companies are a problem. We look at the history, some examples of the best and worst, then share hopes for the future.

Smartphone makers are vomiting a torrent of new phones, and we’re sick of it

Smartphone manufacturers like Huawei, LG, Sony, and Motorola are releasing far too many similar phones. The update cycle has accelerated, but more choice is not always a good thing.

Do we even need 5G at all?

Faster phones, easier access to on-demand video, simpler networking -- on the surface, 5G sounds like a dream. So why is it more of a nightmare?
Home Theater

The Apple AirPods 2 needed to come out today. Here are four reasons why

Apple announced numerous new products at its October 30 event, a lineup that included a new iPad Pro, a MacBook Air, as well as a new Mac Mini. Here are four reasons we wish a new set of AirPods were on that list.

Razer’s most basic Blade 15 is the one most gamers should buy

Razer's Blade 15 is an awesome laptop for both gamers, streamers, professionals, and anyone else needing serious go in a slim profile, but its price is out of reach for many games. The new Blade 15 Base solves that problem with few…

Going to hell, again. The Switch makes 'Diablo 3' feel brand-new

I've played every version of Diablo 3 released since 2012, racking up hundreds of hours in the process. Six years later, I'm playing it yet again on Nintendo Switch. Somehow, it still feels fresh.

‘Fallout 76’ may have online multiplayer but it’s still a desolate wasteland

"Is Fallout 76 an MMO?" That depends on who you ask. Critics and players often cite its online multiplayer capabilities as a reason it qualifies. Yet calling the game an MMO only confuses matters, and takes away from what could make…
Digital Trends Live

Microsoft has #*!@ed up to-do lists on an epic scale

Microsoft has mucked up to-do lists on a scale you simply can’t imagine, a failure that spans multiple products and teams, like a lil’ bit of salmonella that contaminates the entire output from a factory.

As Amazon turns up the volume on streaming, Spotify should shudder

Multiple players are all looking to capitalize on the popularity of streaming, but it has thus far proved nearly impossible to make a profit. Could major tech companies like Amazon be primed for a streaming take-over?

Throw out the sandbox. ‘Red Dead Redemption 2’ is a fully realized western world

Despite featuring around 100 story missions, the real destination in Red Dead Redemption 2 is the journey you make for yourself in the Rockstar's open world, and the game is better for it.

‘Diablo Immortal’ is just the beginning. Mobile games are the future

Diablo fans were furious about Diablo Immortal, but in truth, mobile games are the future. From Apple and Samsung to Bethesda and Blizzard, we’re seeing a new incentive for games that fit on your phone.