Wearables don’t just let us compete with strangers, they let us peep on them too

Brian Heater Wearables 090114
These days, I think I’m mostly wearing a JawBone Up for the added self-esteem boost.

I haven’t really had much trouble motivating myself to get to the gym as of late, or to take a walk around the city on a sunny day. But I’d be lying if I said I those steps didn’t get a little spring in them upon reading that I’m apparently averaging 8,900 more steps a day than other male Up users in my general age range, or something along those lines.

It’s a fun bit of data. And really, that’s one of the most appealing elements of personal fitness trackers: the ability to, in a sense, compete against others, or at the very least, to compete against some abstract notion of the “average”person (more correctly, the average person who goes out their way to wear a fitness bad). It’s a sense of motivation through gamification, and it speaks to an inherent sense of competitiveness bred into us through decades of after-school sports and standardized testing.

There’s probably something worse than being average, but at the moment I can’t come up with anything.

Our fitness trackers, are, well tracking us.

For obvious reasons, we tend to think on an individual level when thinking about personal fitness trackers —look, it’s right there in the name. Every so often, however, we get a reminder that these device are also operating on a much more macro level. Think about it this way: That little wristband you’re wearing to track your steps throughout the day? It’s a data sponge. It literally exists with the sole purpose of collecting your personal information: how much you’re moving, when you’re moving, in some cases where you’re going and, of course, how much you’re sleeping.

JawBone saw a rather canny PR opportunity when an earthquake struck Northern California a week or so ago. The day after the vineyards and cellars of Napa County were rattled by the largest tremor in a quarter century, a graph made the cable news rounds showing a sudden jolt around 3:20, when JawBone wearers were suddenly roused from bed by that 6.0 quake. No major shock there of course, but what is interesting is the fact that 45 percent of those woken in the middle of the night never made it back to sleep, which seems to speak to the sort of primal fear we experience when the earth begins to move under us.

Again, this isn’t groundbreaking stuff (sorry), but it speaks to some interesting possibilities for this sort of data. What can this kind of information teach us about ourselves when collected over a large population for a long period of time? The more precise the information becomes, the more insight we can gain over societal habits and health issues, broken into handy categories like location, gender and age range. It’s easy to see how health organizations would be champing at the bit for that kind of data in an age of out-of-control obesity, diabetes and other controllable health risks.

JawBone Up tracking

While lauded by many, however, Jawbone’s graph simultaneously presented a potential PR nightmare for JawBone. It shed some light on a fact that we were all aware of, but many just hadn’t taken the time to really consider: Our fitness trackers, are, well tracking us. To put an even finer point on it, they’re watching us while we sleep. We’ve had plenty of time to consider and bemoan the ramifications for such tracking when it comes to our smartphones, but fitness trackers are relatively new phenomenon. Unlike our phones, however, which also serve as our cameras, gaming devices and dating services, all fitness trackers are designed to do is track.

Last month, Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer made mention of the phenomenon, calling for federal protection against what he called a potential “privacy nightmare”and calling FitBit out by name. Here’s Chuck:

Personal fitness bracelets and the data they collect on your health, sleep, and location, should be just that personal. The fact that private health data rich enough to identify the users gait is being gathered by applications like Fitbit and can then be sold to third-parties without the user’s consent is a true privacy nightmare.

45 percent of those woken in the middle of the night never made it back to sleep.

The Senator’s concern is the same concern many have raised against personal information magnets like Facebook: the potential for selling or otherwise sharing deeply personal information with third-parties. I would add to that list the potential of less malicious accidental data breeches. Back in 2011, there was a kerfuffle when it was discovered that information being logged by FitBit users regarding the calories burned during sexual activity was discoverable through Google. The word “yeesh”comes to mind.

Facebook was also in hot water earlier this year when it purchased fitness tracking app Moves and decided to let the app share info with the social network. The shift in Terms of Service didn’t really mince words:

We may share information, including personally identifying information, with our Affiliates (companies that are part of our corporate groups of companies, including but not limited to Facebook) to help provide, understand, and improve our Services.

For its part, Fitbit was quick to respond to Schumer’s comments. (See? Exercise pays off.) The company insisted that it doesn’t sell the data it collects and suggested that the Senator team up with the company to “work…on this important issue.”

And this is sort of where we are right now. We’re taking the first (tracked) steps into a world of wearables, where all of our data is potentially up for grabs. As scary as Facebooks and iPhones have been for privacy advocates, just imagine a near future when everything on our person is measuring something personal about us. Much like the recent earthquake, it’s enough to make many lose sleep.

The answer, as always, is vigilance. Both for ourselves and the companies. We need to be hyper aware of what we’re willing to give up, what companies intend to do with that information, and when the opportunity presents itself, flipping them the occasional middle finger.

The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not reflect the beliefs of Digital Trends.

Computing

Nvidia’s new GPUs look amazing, but that doesn’t mean you should buy one

Nvidia's GeForce 2080 is a powerful graphics card that supports ray tracing to deliver real-time cinematic renderings of shadows, light, and reflection in games, but unless you were already planning on upgrading, you'll probably want to…
Mobile

Find out how to keep tabs on your phone with these helpful tracking tips

Need to keep tabs on the location of your cell phone or smartphone? Consult this guide for tips and tricks on how to track a phone, whether you're currently rocking Android, iOS, or something more old-school.
Emerging Tech

Ekster 3.0 lets you ask, ‘Alexa, where did I leave my wallet?’

Ekster's newest smart wallet is its best yet. It's slimmer than ever, boasts a neat card-dispensing mechanism, and will even let you know where it is, thanks to smart speaker integration.
Smart Home

Facebook’s new Portal device can collect your data to target your ads

Facebook confirmed that its new Portal smart displays, designed to enable Messenger-enabled video calls, technically have the capability to gather data on users via the camera and mic onboard.
Emerging Tech

Curious how A.I. 'brains' work? Here's a super-simple breakdown of deep learning

What is deep learning? A branch of machine learning, this field deals with the creation of neural networks that are modeled after the brain and adept at dealing with large amounts of human-oriented data, like writing and voice commands.
Wearables

New Wear OS smartwatches have arrived! Here’s why you shouldn’t buy them

The likes of Skagen and Diesel have unveiled new Wear OS smartwatches at IFA 2018. You shouldn't buy them, because they're utilizing an old processor. Qualcomm is expected to announce a new wearable processor next month.
Movies & TV

Bored with Netflix? As it goes global, the selection is about to explode

Netflix is going global. And even if you never leave step foot outside America, you should be excited. More subscribers abroad means more original, diverse content, and plenty to watch when House of Cards gets stale.
Home Theater

8K is the next big thing in TVs. Get over it

8K is the next big thing in TV. At least, that’s how LG, Samsung, Sony, and Sharp would have it. At IFA 2018, Samsung announced it would begin shipping its gorgeous Q900R series series 8K TVs this year. LG arrived with a glorious 88-inch…
Features

Opinion: Apple needs to modernize its antiquated annual app update routine

While Google updates its core Android apps frequently through the Play Store, Apple saves up core app updates for its annual iOS unveiling. Perhaps it’s time that Apple took a new approach.
Photography

Canon and Nikon’s new mirrorless cameras impress. Should Sony start worrying?

Canon’s EOS R and Nikon’s Z mirrorless systems are coming out of the gate strong, incorporating features that took Sony years to implement and refine. But Sony still has a lead, and may have it for some time.
Mobile

XS Max? XR? Apple’s new iPhone names are a confusing mess

Apple's new iPhone range has the most baffling set of names we've seen in a while, and it's not good news. The phones may be great, but the confusing names shift away from the one brand name everyone knows.
Apple

OPINION: Apple’s new iPhones show off its best tech, and also its greed

We’re just as enamored by the new iPhones as the next person, but with fast charging an extra cost and the removal of the headphone dongle it feels like Apple is gouging us on accessories.
Smart Home

The Google Home Hub doesn’t have a camera. Here’s why that’s a good thing

Bucking the smart display trend, Google's new $149 Home Hub smart display surprisingly doesn't have a camera. We think a camera-less Google smart speaker with a screen is a good thing, and here's why.
Mobile

It’s the phone equivalent of a Bentley. So why does the Pixel 3 look like a VW?

Google has got 100-percent of the Pixel 3's specification and technology right, so we're annoyed that it only got 50-percent of the design right. In a year of fabulous-looking phones, this is a problem.