Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Business
  4. Mobile
  5. News

AT&T and Google want access to the secret docs in Apple’s iMessage suit

Add as a preferred source on Google

Late last year, a federal court approved a suit against Apple for its handling of an iMessage bug that affected users who switched from an iPhone to an Android phone. The disgruntled customers found that they didn’t receive messages from iPhone users after they got their new Android phones.

It’s been nearly nine months since then, and two interesting companies have joined the party: AT&T and Google. It’s not clear what the motives are of either company, but both filed motions with the federal court. The early consensus is that both companies want to get a look at some of Apple’s internal communications regarding how the company handled fixing the problem that spanned over three years.

Recommended Videos

Disappearing messages

The suit emerged after many consumers, who switched from an iPhone to an Android phone and kept the same phone number, could not receive text messages from iPhone users. The issue was a fallacy in Apple’s iMessage cloud messaging app that wouldn’t allow it to deliver text messages to a phone number no longer connected to Apple’s iCloud service. Consumers were forced to jump through hoops to remove their phone numbers from iCloud.

 

The complaint is not only for the inconvenience, but it’s more about the fact that Apple didn’t notify users that they would not be able to receive text messages from other iPhone users if they switched to another platform. More importantly, since these messages were never delivered, the plaintiffs feel that the text messages were “illegally intercepted and interned by Apple.” In other words, the messages were held by Apple indefinitely and never delivered. This could count as “unauthorized access” and a violation of both the Stored Communications Act and the Federal Wiretap Act.

Apple obviously denies the claims and contends it did not maliciously hold the text messages, nor did the company spy on them. The problem has been since rectified, but it took more than three years to fix.

AT&T and Google peek at secret court documents

What’s interesting about this case is that Apple was granted permission to keep the litigation in secrecy, so the majority of court documents will never be seen by the public. The emergence of AT&T and Google in this case is likely to open some access to these documents, but it’s also possible that it could result in further cases against Apple.

AT&T and Google might be looking for evidence that suggests Apple maliciously took its time to fix the problem.

AT&T claims that many customers returned Android phones after switching from an iPhone because they weren’t getting all their text messages. So AT&T had to deal with irate customers for something that was not in the company’s control. Those returns were most likely either at a cost to AT&T or sent back to the manufacturers at a cost to them.

The bottom line is that both AT&T and Google might be looking for evidence that suggests Apple maliciously took its time to rectify the situation, which in turn hurt sales for AT&T, as well as for Google and it’s Android manufacturers.

The potential outcome

If there is a silver lining for Apple, it’s the fact that U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh ruled recently that the case could not proceed as a class action suit. This means that if Apple were to lose, the company would only be responsible for damages to the original plaintiff, Adrienne Moore. If it were allowed to move forward as a class action suit, more people could participate, which would raise the cost of damages significantly. However, this ruling doesn’t stop AT&T, Google, or anyone else from filing a separate suit.

We will have to keep an eye on this one, as it is sure to get very interesting.

Robert Nazarian
Robert Nazarian became a technology enthusiast when his parents bought him a Radio Shack TRS-80 Color. Now his biggest…
Apple’s new child safety tools are now available with better controls for screen time, web access, and harmful content
Parents can now start child accounts with a smaller set of approved apps and add more access later
Apple child safety features revealed at WWDC 2026

Apple first previewed a new set of child safety features at WWDC in June, and parents can now start using them with iOS 27, iPadOS 27, and macOS 27. The update gives families more control over which apps children can access, what websites they can visit, who they can communicate with, and how much time they spend in certain app categories.

Apple is also changing Screen Time to make those controls easier to manage. Parents get a clearer view of device usage, quicker access to restrictions, and age-based guidance for setting limits across categories such as Games, Social Media, and Entertainment.

Read more
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold 2 rumors are heating up after the iPhone Duo launch
Samsung may be getting ready for round two of the tri-fold fight, but that rumored $2,899 price is still a tough sell.
Samsung Galaxy TriFold folding, TriFold Phone

Samsung may not be ready to let the tri-fold phone disappear just yet. New reports suggest the company is considering bringing the Galaxy Z TriFold 2 to market earlier than planned, potentially in response to Apple's newly launched iPhone Duo. The sequel was previously expected sometime in 2027, but that timeline could now be moved up.

Samsung wants a second shot at the tri-fold

Read more
iPhone 18 Pro Max vs. Pixel 11 Pro XL vs. Galaxy S26 Ultra: Which flagship deserves your $1,299?
Three phones, one price, three entirely different definitions of what makes a flagship worth buying in 2026.
Electronics, Phone, Mobile Phone

Over the years, I've written dozens of these comparisons, but this one feels different for two very specific reasons.

First, Apple, Google, and Samsung have landed on the same $1,299 starting price for their top-tier non-folding flagships, just as the memory crisis pushes smartphone component costs higher. That makes this less a simple spec comparison and more a test of what each company thinks is worth $1,299 in 2026.

Read more