Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Apple
  4. Mobile
  5. News

Apple casting for 'Planet of the Apps,' its first foray into original content

Add as a preferred source on Google

Following in the footsteps of Netflix and Hulu, Apple is creating its own content for users to enjoy. The first show the company is developing is called Planet of the Apps, which is a series that follows app creation and the developers that build those apps.

Details about the new show are still a little vague, but it seems like it will bear similarities to Shark Tank, with developers pitching their apps to investors in order to receive featured placement on the App Store when the show finishes. A report from MacRumors sheds a little light on the show and how it will work.

Recommended Videos

According to a MacRumors’ anonymous source, the show’s application process includes four rounds. Developers submit their applications on the Planet of the Apps website, after which some will get a call from a casting director in Los Angeles notifying them that they have made it to the next round. In the second round, the developer is told to create a 5 to 10 minute unedited video about the app that is then edited by the show’s staff and shown to the producers directly. In the video, the developer is told to talk about how the app would make money, how it works, and what makes it unique.

In the third round, the developer is given a week to sign a contract covering the legalities behind the show. Forms include a medical release, an app idea information form, and so on. The developer is also asked to tell the casting coordinators about the team’s availability over the next few months, during which time they would be flown to L.A. on three occasions for a total of nine days of filming. In the fourth and final round, the developer is subjected to a background check and told that even in the fourth stage, some developers would be selected on a standby basis, and that not all developers would appear on the show.

Filming of the show will reportedly take place until early 2017, and early episodes may air at some point in March or April.

Christian de Looper
Christian de Looper is a long-time freelance writer who has covered every facet of the consumer tech and electric vehicle…
TSMC might set up a price hike that could come straight for your next phone, laptop, or tablet
Here's what TSMC's rumored 10% chip price increase actually means in dollar terms, and why your next phone or laptop could end up costing more.
TSMC Fab

My wallet flinched the second I saw the words "TSMC" and "price increase" in the same headline, and honestly, yours should too.

Turns out the company behind the silicon powering basically every flagship device out there, including Apple’s A-series and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon processors, is reportedly about to make all of it a little pricier.

Read more
Samsung’s free storage doubling for preorders is gone in Austria, and the replacement isn’t as sweet
Samsung's free storage doubling deal might just be history.
The back of the Galaxy Z Fold 7

If you've pre-ordered a Samsung foldable purely for the free storage bump, tomorrow's Unpacked event might sting a little.

For years, pre-ordering a new Galaxy meant automatically getting double the storage at no additional charge. Buy the 128GB model, walk away with 256GB for the same price. The same applied to the 256GB and 512GB models. However, that might change at the upcoming Galaxy Unpacked event. 

Read more
Apple fixes Hide My Email bug that exposed users’ real email addresses
Here's how Apple's Hide My Email flaw leaked real addresses for over a year, and why it only got fixed once the story went public.
apple-merging-sign-in-with-apple-hide-my-email-icloud+

Turns out the "Hide" part of Hide My Email wasn't doing its job quite as advertised, something that I covered early in July. Security researcher Tyler Murphy reported the flaw in June 2025, but despite Apple claiming it was resolved in March 2026, independent tests confirmed it remained exploitable, at least until July 3, 2026.

So how did this bug actually work?

Read more