Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Mobile
  4. News

Apple says iPhone 16e users don’t care about MagSafe — they’re probably right

Add as a preferred source on Google
A group of iPhone 16e phones arranged in a pattern.
Apple

The iPhone 16e launches today, and the first reviews are starting to appear online. One review that caught my attention was from John Gruber at Daring Fireball. The lengthy review has some information he picked up from Apple officials on why the company elected not to include MagSafe for wireless charging on the iPhone 16e. The reason is almost certainly on the mark and isn’t all about saving money.

As we’ve already noted, Apple’s latest budget phone shares many features with the iPhone 16. However, the iPhone 16e is priced $200 lower. As a result, some features present in the iPhone 16 are omitted from the iPhone 16e, with MagSafe being one of them.

Recommended Videos

MagSafe first launched with the iPhone 12 series in 2020. Other than the iPhone SE 3 (which launched in 2022), every iPhone produced since then included MagSafe—until the iPhone 16e.

Gruber said Apple representatives concluded that “most people in the 16e’s target audience exclusively charge their phones by plugging them into a charging cable. They tend not to use inductive charging at all, and when they do, they might not care that the 16e is stuck with a pokey 7.5W Qi charging speed, when recent more expensive iPhones charge via MagSafe at 15W or even 25W.”

So the bottom line: Apple has concluded most in the iPhone 16e demographic couldn’t care less about MagSafe.

After reading Gruber’s report, I reflected on my parents, who I believe are likely part of the target demographic for the iPhone 16e. They are both in their mid-70s and currently own iPhone 14 models. However, they do not use MagSafe technology. The only time they charge their phones is at night, so fast charging isn’t a priority for them. I would expect that new iPhone buyers, like my parents, may share similar preferences, which could be a consideration for Apple when marketing the iPhone 16e.

The iPhone 16e is officially available as of today, February 28, starting at a price of $599 for the 128GB model. The 256GB version is priced at $699, while the 512GB model costs $899. These prices are $200 less than those of the iPhone 16 models.

However, the iPhone 16e lacks certain features, such as Camera Control, Dynamic Island, and a wide-angle rear camera. It also comes with a 4-core GPU, compared to the 5-core GPU found in the iPhone 16.

On the positive side, the iPhone 16e offers longer battery life, lasting 26 hours compared to the 22 hours of the more expensive model. Additionally, it is slightly lighter in weight.

Bryan M. Wolfe
Former Mobile and A/V Freelancer
Bryan M. Wolfe has over a decade of experience as a technology writer. He writes about mobile.
Xiaomi 17T Pro review: Not quite Ultra, but I didn’t want to put it down
Xiaomi is luring me back with Leica charm and battery madness... again
Xiaomi 17T Pro features an all-metal body

Xiaomi started off with a reputation as a very enthusiastic Apple “admirer”. But over the years, the company has built a strong identity of its own. One that doesn’t compromise on value, still stays competitive on pricing, and often manages to sneak genuinely flagship-grade hardware into phones that sit just below the most expensive Ultra models. And in recent years, I’ve come to appreciate a lot of Xiaomi’s products, especially its smartphones.

So when I got my hands on the Xiaomi 17T Pro, I kind of knew what to expect. A sleek design, a solid AMOLED display, and a great photography experience thanks to Leica tuning. For around $1,000 (€899), it isn’t exactly an impulse buy thanks to the ongoing price hikes. But Xiaomi has worked on offering a rounded experience that fits neatly below its true flagship, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra. 

Read more
Apple just raised the price of its products by hundreds of dollars
Apple shielded customers from memory costs longer than anyone. But the inevitable has happened.
iPadOS 27 on iPad

For months, the memory crisis was everyone else’s problem, but it didn't affect Apple. While smartphone and laptop makers quickly gave in, raising prices across their entry-level and flagship products, Apple stood strong, absorbing costs through long-term supplier deals that gave it leverage most brands simply didn’t have.

The situation, I fear, has gotten worse. Earlier today, the Cupertino giant revised the prices for multiple products, including the MacBooks, iPads, and Mac Studio. 

Read more
I checked the Prime Day budget phone deals, and these two are the ones worth buying
Google is the smarter long-term pick, while Motorola is the ultra-cheap phone deal for basic everyday use.
Electronics, Phone, Mobile Phone

Budget phone deals can be some of the worst Prime Day traps because the low price does a lot of emotional damage to common sense. A cheap phone still needs enough storage, decent battery life, a usable camera, and enough performance to avoid becoming drawer clutter by Halloween. These two deals make sense for different reasons: the Pixel 10a is the better all-around Android buy, while the Moto G Play is the cheapest phone here that still has a clear job.

Google Pixel 10a

Read more