Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Business
  4. Mobile
  5. News

People are more satisfied with AT&T than with any other U.S. carrier, but just barely

Add as a preferred source on Google

T-Mobile may give out Lyft credit and free data for Pokémon Go to its customers on a weekly basis, but it’s AT&T that has the highest customer satisfaction among the major U.S. carriers, according to JD Power’s two latest customer studies.

Based on responses from 7,556 full-service wireless customers from January through June, the study looks at how U.S. carriers provide customer service through phone and walk-in. More specifically, JD Power looked at how contacting carriers by phone and going to one of their stores related to the efficiency of problem resolution and how long you were put on hold, just to name a few factors.

Recommended Videos

With that said, AT&T came out on top with 820 points, with T-Mobile right behind it with 815. Meanwhile, Verizon came in third with 797 points, and Sprint came in last with 750 points, with the overall average sitting at 804 points. All points are based on a 1,000 point scale.

AT&T, in particular, performed “particularly well in the walk-in (retail stores) and online channels,” though JD Power gave no other specifics.

As far as the prepaid sector is concerned, Consumer Cellular came out on top with 878 points, with the carrier performing particularly well when it came to its automated response system. Meanwhile, the likes of Cricket Wireless (790 points), Boost Mobile (784 points), MetroPCS (765 points), Virgin Mobile (761 points), and Straight Talk (714 points) all coming in below.

JD Power did not stop with customer satisfaction regarding U.S. carriers, though. The company noted that 72 percent of customers who contacted their carrier online did so using either their smartphone or tablet. Furthermore, looking up information on a carrier’s website was the most common activity through online contact, with overall satisfaction highest among customers whose online contact was through a user forum.

It appears that more and more people are looking to try solutions out on their own first before resorting to talking to a customer representative.

Williams Pelegrin
Williams is an avid New York Yankees fan, speaks Spanish, resides in Colorado, and has an affinity for Frosted Flakes. Send…
TSMC might set up a price hike that could come straight for your next phone, laptop, or tablet
Here's what TSMC's rumored 10% chip price increase actually means in dollar terms, and why your next phone or laptop could end up costing more.
TSMC Fab

My wallet flinched the second I saw the words "TSMC" and "price increase" in the same headline, and honestly, yours should too.

Turns out the company behind the silicon powering basically every flagship device out there, including Apple’s A-series and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon processors, is reportedly about to make all of it a little pricier.

Read more
Samsung’s free storage doubling for preorders is gone in Austria, and the replacement isn’t as sweet
Samsung's free storage doubling deal might just be history.
The back of the Galaxy Z Fold 7

If you've pre-ordered a Samsung foldable purely for the free storage bump, tomorrow's Unpacked event might sting a little.

For years, pre-ordering a new Galaxy meant automatically getting double the storage at no additional charge. Buy the 128GB model, walk away with 256GB for the same price. The same applied to the 256GB and 512GB models. However, that might change at the upcoming Galaxy Unpacked event. 

Read more
Apple fixes Hide My Email bug that exposed users’ real email addresses
Here's how Apple's Hide My Email flaw leaked real addresses for over a year, and why it only got fixed once the story went public.
apple-merging-sign-in-with-apple-hide-my-email-icloud+

Turns out the "Hide" part of Hide My Email wasn't doing its job quite as advertised, something that I covered early in July. Security researcher Tyler Murphy reported the flaw in June 2025, but despite Apple claiming it was resolved in March 2026, independent tests confirmed it remained exploitable, at least until July 3, 2026.

So how did this bug actually work?

Read more