Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Mobile
  4. News

EFF sides with YouTube, says T-Mobile is throttling video on its network

Add as a preferred source on Google

T-Mobile already had trouble with its Binge On program when it launched, with net neutrality advocates calling the network out for sidelining the laws. Now, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has sided with these advocates, claiming the program should be considered throttling.

In a report published on Monday, the EFF shows that T-Mobile’s “video optimization” is nothing more than network throttling. It lowers all video content, regardless of the service, to 1.5Mbps.

eff-test-results-t-mobile
EFF test results on T-Mobile network Image used with permission by copyright holder

That allows T-Mobile to cut the costs of supplying video content, by lowering the video quality to 480p. T-Mobile argues that most customers are simply incapable of viewing higher quality video, despite some customers suggesting they could watch HD video before the Binge On program launched.

Recommended Videos

YouTube is the biggest video provider in the U.S. to not support the Binge On program, and last week said T-Mobile is throttling its content. It wants to see the program become opt-in rather than opt-out, or have services unsupported removed from the program.

T-Mobile has not said whether it will honor YouTube’s requests. In a statement made shortly after YouTube’s comments, T-Mobile refuted claims it is throttling video content, despite clear evidence that it is lowering the bandwidth for video content across its network.

The third largest network might face more than angry customers and services in the near future, with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) sending letters to T-Mobile, AT&T, and Comcast on the new “data-free” services, which might break net neutrality laws set in place last year.

T-Mobile has been winning over customers with its new Un-Carrier deals, but this latest program might hurt the company, especially if video services or net neutrality advocates continue to fight against it. The EFF says the FCC should investigate the Binge On program, and we suspect in the next few months we will hear a lot more about the program’s future.

David Curry
Former Contributor
David has been writing about technology for several years, following the latest trends and covering the largest events. He is…
TSMC might set up a price hike that could come straight for your next phone, laptop, or tablet
Here's what TSMC's rumored 10% chip price increase actually means in dollar terms, and why your next phone or laptop could end up costing more.
TSMC Fab

My wallet flinched the second I saw the words "TSMC" and "price increase" in the same headline, and honestly, yours should too.

Turns out the company behind the silicon powering basically every flagship device out there, including Apple’s A-series and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon processors, is reportedly about to make all of it a little pricier.

Read more
Samsung’s free storage doubling for preorders is gone in Austria, and the replacement isn’t as sweet
Samsung's free storage doubling deal might just be history.
The back of the Galaxy Z Fold 7

If you've pre-ordered a Samsung foldable purely for the free storage bump, tomorrow's Unpacked event might sting a little.

For years, pre-ordering a new Galaxy meant automatically getting double the storage at no additional charge. Buy the 128GB model, walk away with 256GB for the same price. The same applied to the 256GB and 512GB models. However, that might change at the upcoming Galaxy Unpacked event. 

Read more
Apple fixes Hide My Email bug that exposed users’ real email addresses
Here's how Apple's Hide My Email flaw leaked real addresses for over a year, and why it only got fixed once the story went public.
apple-merging-sign-in-with-apple-hide-my-email-icloud+

Turns out the "Hide" part of Hide My Email wasn't doing its job quite as advertised, something that I covered early in July. Security researcher Tyler Murphy reported the flaw in June 2025, but despite Apple claiming it was resolved in March 2026, independent tests confirmed it remained exploitable, at least until July 3, 2026.

So how did this bug actually work?

Read more