Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Audio / Video
  4. Business
  5. Mobile
  6. News

FCC wants to be informed about data-free streaming services from T-Mobile, AT&T, and Comcast

Add as a preferred source on Google

Streaming video and music without having it count against your data cap has become a more common industry practice recently, and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) wants to learn more about it, reports Cnet.

According to the report, FCC chairman Tom Wheeler sent letters to T-Mobile, AT&T, and Comcast requesting more information about their respective services in regards to data-free streaming. The FCC asked that the companies respond no later than January 15, 2016 — though Wheeler emphasized that the letters were not part of a larger investigation on his agency’s part.

Recommended Videos

“Let me be real clear,” said Wheeler. “These were ‘let’s get informed letters.'”

The services in question are T-Mobile’s Binge On, AT&T’s Data Perks, and Comcast’s Stream TV. Binge On allows T-Mobile customers to stream video from several different sources without having it count against their monthly data allotments. Data Perks, meanwhile, is a “sponsored data” program that gives AT&T customers free additional data if they agree to take surveys and complete shopping offers. Finally, Stream TV allows customers to stream video without it counting against their monthly broadband data caps.

These services serve as examples of “zero rating,” an industry practice that allows Internet service providers to disallow data usage in certain applications to count against a customer’s monthly data cap. Although some have seen this as a practice that benefits customers, others argue it goes against the FCC’s net neutrality regulations, since they require that Internet services be treated the same across the board.

More specifically, some argue that zero rating puts smaller competitors at a disadvantage, since they don’t have the resources to offer similar data-free streaming services.

All three aforementioned companies don’t seem too concerned about the letters, however. A T-Mobile spokesperson said that the carrier “looks forward to talking to the FCC” about Binge On. Meanwhile, AT&T said that it’s reviewing the letter and that it’s “committed to innovation without permission and hopes the FCC is, too.” Finally, Comcast said its Stream TV service doesn’t violate net neutrality regulations since it doesn’t use public Internet pipelines.

The FCC did take a closer look at T-Mobile’s Binge On back in November, though Wheeler concluded that the service did not violate net neutrality rules by saying it was pro-innovation and pro-competition.

Williams Pelegrin
Williams is an avid New York Yankees fan, speaks Spanish, resides in Colorado, and has an affinity for Frosted Flakes. Send…
TSMC might set up a price hike that could come straight for your next phone, laptop, or tablet
Here's what TSMC's rumored 10% chip price increase actually means in dollar terms, and why your next phone or laptop could end up costing more.
TSMC Fab

My wallet flinched the second I saw the words "TSMC" and "price increase" in the same headline, and honestly, yours should too.

Turns out the company behind the silicon powering basically every flagship device out there, including Apple’s A-series and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon processors, is reportedly about to make all of it a little pricier.

Read more
Samsung’s free storage doubling for preorders is gone in Austria, and the replacement isn’t as sweet
Samsung's free storage doubling deal might just be history.
The back of the Galaxy Z Fold 7

If you've pre-ordered a Samsung foldable purely for the free storage bump, tomorrow's Unpacked event might sting a little.

For years, pre-ordering a new Galaxy meant automatically getting double the storage at no additional charge. Buy the 128GB model, walk away with 256GB for the same price. The same applied to the 256GB and 512GB models. However, that might change at the upcoming Galaxy Unpacked event. 

Read more
Apple fixes Hide My Email bug that exposed users’ real email addresses
Here's how Apple's Hide My Email flaw leaked real addresses for over a year, and why it only got fixed once the story went public.
apple-merging-sign-in-with-apple-hide-my-email-icloud+

Turns out the "Hide" part of Hide My Email wasn't doing its job quite as advertised, something that I covered early in July. Security researcher Tyler Murphy reported the flaw in June 2025, but despite Apple claiming it was resolved in March 2026, independent tests confirmed it remained exploitable, at least until July 3, 2026.

So how did this bug actually work?

Read more