Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Android
  4. Apple
  5. Mobile
  6. Photography
  7. News

Google exec sparks controversy with Pixel 3 vs. iPhone XS photo tweet

Add as a preferred source on Google
Marvin Chow/Twitter.com

Google vice president of marketing Marvin Chow has sparked debate on Twitter after sharing an image comparing the cameras on the Google Pixel 3 and the Apple iPhone XS. Rather than a shot of a dramatic landscape, or a bokeh-filled portrait, the picture is of a low-light street scene, and demonstrates the difference between the iPhone’s camera and Night Sight mode on the Pixel 3.

The controversy comes from the considerable difference between the two, and whether one is really “better” than the other. Chow writes in his tweet, “Night Sight on the Google Pixel 3 — pretty much speaks for itself,” and adds an explosion emoji to indicate the photo’s supremacy over the iPhone, in his humble opinion.

Recommended Videos

Looked at quickly, the Google Pixel 3’s Night Sight shot reveals more about the scene, including the female model’s clothes and facial features, but it takes on an almost hyper-real look. Without being present when the photo was taken, it’s impossible to know what it really looked like at the time, but it’s hard to imagine the scene looked like this to the naked eye. The iPhone XS’s photo shrouds the model in shadow, with moody lighting behind her from the neon signs, potentially making it more realistic.

Differences debated

Both are very different photographs. Why? The Google Pixel 3 uses Night Sight to take its photo, a special camera mode that combines the HDR+ mode with some artificial intelligence magic to boost the colors and brightness in low-light photos. (Read our complete guide to Pixel 3 photography for more info.) The results aren’t always as instantly dramatic as the one shared by Chow, but are rarely anything other than visually impressive.

The controversy comes from just how different the two are, and whether the Night Sight photo really is an improvement over the iPhone’s photo. Replies to Chow’s tweet and picture include complaints about Night Sight’s tendency to over saturate and overexpose a shot, and to introduce noise following aggressive software enhancement. We noted in our Night Sight launch story that it can, “Strip away the ambiance or mood of the image,” and some may feel this is what has happened in the example image shared on Twitter. The iPhone does not have a similar mode, and the Smart HDR feature introduced on the iPhone XS does not affect low-light images.

The Pixel 3’s picture looks astonishing, however, and would be the image most would instantly share online. The iPhone XS’s picture requires some editing to make it more shareable. Both have their merits and downsides. Which do you prefer?

Andy Boxall
Andy has written about mobile technology for almost a decade. From 2G to 5G and smartphone to smartwatch, Andy knows tech.
Pixel 11 Pro XL vs. Galaxy S26 Ultra: Do you want smarter AI or more powerful hardware?
Two flagships, two philosophies, and one very difficult choice.
Electronics, Phone, Mobile Phone

Google and Samsung aren’t just creating flagship smartphones. They’re building different philosophies for what “flagship” means, how “smart” a smartphone should actually be, and what cost you should pay for a top-tier experience. That would be the major theme in this comparison between the newly-launched Pixel 11 Pro XL, which goes on sale from August 20, 2026, and Samsung’s Galaxy S26 Ultra, which is already available in the market. 

While Google’s new software and AI-based features seem all about killing third-party apps for specific use cases, the Galaxy S26 Ultra leans into raw hardware power and productivity tools to assert its dominance. The reason to choose one, in my opinion, has nothing to do with the difference in the specifications, and everything to do with the type of flagship experience you value more. 

Read more
I am a Google Pixel owner, and I am tired of being an unpaid QA tester
Google Pixel 10 Pro in the official silicon case

Unboxing a flagship smartphone used to feel like a solved equation. You paid top dollar, handed over your credit card, and received a fully baked piece of hardware capable of navigating basic daily life without a thermal meltdown.

Last month, standing under direct sunlight in 45-degree weather, my partner held her $1,000 Pixel 10 Pro up to my car's air conditioning vent just so Google Maps wouldn't shut down mid-route. It wasn't rendering 3D ray-traced graphics or exporting 8K video. I was simply following GPS directions while listening to a podcast - a routine task my three-year-old iPhone 15 handled without breaking a sweat. Rest assured, Google Maps did take us to the wrong address in the end.

Read more
Pixel 11 vs Pixel 10 series: Do Google’s new phones offer enough for an upgrade?
I compared the Pixel 11 series to the Pixel 10, and here's what you should know before buying
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

Google’s Pixel 11 family is here, and on paper, it fixes several things I wanted to see improved from the Pixel 10 generation. Tensor G6 promises a meaningful performance bump on all four models, while Google has upgraded cameras throughout the lineup, along with faster charging, and the Pro models get brighter and tougher displays. The Pixel 11 Pro Fold also undergoes much-needed design refinements.

These are some solid improvements for an annual update to Google's flagship lineup. But whether they justify replacing a Pixel 10 you bought a year ago is a different question. Having covered and used enough annual smartphone refreshes over the years, here's who should actually make the upgrade.

Read more