Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Mobile
  4. Social Media
  5. News

Instagram investigation finds sexual content is served to Teen acounts

Add as a preferred source on Google
Instagram Teen account settings on phone.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends

Late in 2024, Meta introduced Instagram Teen accounts, a safety net intended to protect young minds from sensitive content and ensure that they have safe online interactions, bolstered by age detection tech. Accounts for teens are automatically classified as private, offensive words are hidden, and messages from strangers are blocked.

According to an investigation by youth-focused non-profit, Design It For Us, and Accountable Tech, Instagram’s Teen guardrails aren’t delivering on their promise. Over a span of two weeks, five test accounts belonging to teens were tested, and all of them were shown sexual content despite Meta’s promises.

A barrage of sexualized content

All the test accounts were served unfit content despite enabling the sensitive content filter in the app. “4 out of 5 of our test Teen Accounts were algorithmically recommended body image and disordered eating content,” says the report. 

Recommended Videos

Moreover, 80% of the participants reported that they experienced distress while using Instagram Teen accounts. Interestingly, only one of the five test accounts was show educational images and videos.

“[Approximately] 80% of the content in my feed was related to relationships or crude sex jokes. This content generally stayed away from being absolutely explicit or showing directly graphic imagery, but also left very little to the imagination,” one of the testers was quoted as saying. 

As per the 26-page report, a staggering 55% of the flagged content represented sexual acts, sexual behavior, and sexual imagery. Such videos had accumulated hundreds and thousands of likes, with one of them raking in over 3.3 million likes.

With millions of teens using Instagram and being automatically placed into Instagram Teen Accounts, we wanted to see if these accounts actually create a safer online experience. Check out what we found. pic.twitter.com/72XJg0HHCm

— Design It For Us (@DesignItForUs) May 18, 2025

Instagram’s algorithm also pushed content that promoted harmful concepts such as “ideal” body types, body shaming, and eating habits. Another worrisome theme was videos that promoted alcohol consumption and videos that nudged users to use steroids and supplements to achieve a certain masculine body type. 

A whole package of bad media

Despite Meta’s claims of filtering problematic content, especially for teen users, the test accounts were also shown racist, homophobic, and misogynistic content. Once again, such clips collectively received millions of likes. Videos showing gun violence and domestic abuse were also pushed to the teen accounts.

“Some of our test Teen Accounts did not receive Meta’s default protections. No account received sensitive content controls, while some did not receive protections from offensive comments,” adds the report. 

This won’t be the first time that Instagram (and Meta’s other social media platforms, in general) have been found serving problematic content. In 2021, leaks revealed how Meta knew about the harmful impact of Instagram, especially on young girls dealing with mental health and body image issues. 

In a statement shared with The Washington Post, Meta claimed that the findings of the report are flawed and downplayed the sensitivity of the flagged content. Just over a month ago, the company also expanded its Teen protections to Facebook and Messenger, as well.

“A manufactured report does not change the fact that tens of millions of teens now have a safer experience thanks to Instagram Teen Accounts,” a Meta spokesperson was quoted as saying. They, however, added that the company was looking into the problematic content recommendations. 

Nadeem Sarwar
Nadeem is the Managing Editor at Digital Trends.
Apple’s lease program is just a soft landing for you to spend on pricier iPhones this year
Hand holding iPhone 17 Pro.

A few days ago, Apple introduced a new "Upgrade" program that is essentially a lease program for buying Apple hardware. Instead of paying the full cost up front, you space the monthly installments (12, 24, and 36 month spells), and at the end of the lease period, you can choose to return the device, upgrade to a new one, or pay the remainder cost and keep it forever.

The broad idea is simple. Instead of taking a thousand-dollar hit on the wallet, you space the hit across small monthly payments. For a flagship iPhone, that broadly comes down to a dollar per day, and for budget phones such as the iPhone 17e, it's just half a dollar each day, if you do the breakdown. At least Apple is looking at it that way.

Read more
Pixel 11 leak predicts a weird mix of upgrades and downgrades for a higher price
The Pixel 11 may start at $899 with 256GB of storage, but its camera setup remains unclear.
Google Pixel 10a smartphone

Google may ask Pixel 11 buyers to pay $100 more for a phone that improves the parts they can’t see while leaving a conspicuous camera question unresolved. A new leak from Android Headlines puts the base model at $899, up from the Pixel 10’s $799 starting price.

The extra money would at least buy more capacity. The Pixel 11 reportedly starts at 256GB rather than 128GB, while the leaked specifications list both 12GB and 16GB RAM options. Yet the same list mentions only a main camera and an ultrawide, even though other leaked renders still appear to show three rear camera openings.

Read more
Google’s Pixel 11 Pro Fold could offer Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra specs for $200 less
Google’s leaked foldable could match the Fold8’s price with Ultra-sized screens and 5x zoom
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

Google may be preparing to challenge Samsung’s most expensive foldable without charging Ultra money. According to Android Headlines, the Pixel 11 Pro Fold will start at $1,899, matching the Galaxy Z Fold8 and undercutting the $2,099 Fold8 Ultra by $200.

Its rumored hardware makes that pricing especially interesting. Google’s foldable appears much closer to Samsung’s Ultra model in display size, even though it would cost the same as the smaller Fold8.

Read more