Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Photography
  3. News

Pro photographers teach Google Clips when (and when not) to take a photo

Add as a preferred source on Google

How do you train an artificial intelligence program to choose when to take a picture? Using professional photographers of course. That’s part of the approach Google engineers took while developing Clips, the wearable camera that presses the shutter button for you (at least some of the time anyway). On the Google Design Blog, the company recently shared a glimpse at how the A.I. inside of the upcoming camera was built.

While a majority of A.I. programs are so large that cloud-based storage is a necessity, Google Clips houses the entire program inside of the camera, a security measure to keep content offline until the user decides to upload. Google engineers have spent three years building the camera — including the software.

Recommended Videos

Google says the approach to the Clips’ A.I. is human-centered. Google designer Josh Lovejoy put out a job ad for photographers, and in return was able to build a team that included a documentary filmmaker, a photojournalist, and a fine art photographer. After putting content from all those creatives together, the team asked, “What makes a memorable moment?”

While the group started with big ideas about rule of thirds, lighting and depth of field, the programmers began to realize they needed to simplify the list in order to teach those ideas to a computer — or as Lovejoy puts it, teaching Go, Dog, Go!  rather than starting with Shakespeare.

With a revised approach, the engineers began teaching the software using consistent examples — with each image fed into the system designed around teaching one specific concept. Many of those concepts, rather than what to look for, centered on what not to photograph. Clips was trained to ignore bouncing around inside of a purse, fingers over the lens, shaky movements, and blur, for example.

So besides what not to do, how did the system learn which moments to photograph? Clips is also trained in diversity — the camera is more likely to take a picture with a change in the environment, for example. Clips looks for visual changes using color along with avoiding allowing too much time to pass before taking another picture. As Google shared with the announcement of the lifelogging camera, the A.I. is also trained to learn which faces are familiar and which are strangers.

In the end, simplifying the program created the best results, the blog post suggests, alongside slight overshooting and giving the user the final say over which images to keep. Google also added a shutter button and software viewfinder to give the user the ability to snap shots themselves.

“In the context of subjectivity and personalization, perfection simply isn’t possible, and it really shouldn’t even be a goal,” Lovejoy said. “Unlike traditional software development, [machine learning] systems will never be ‘bug-free’ because prediction is an innately fuzzy science. But it’s precisely this fuzziness that makes ML so useful … success with Clips isn’t just about keeps, deletes, clicks, and edits (though those are important), it’s about authorship, co-learning, and adaptation over time.”

Google hasn’t yet shared an official launch date for Clips, though recent Federal Communications Commission approval suggests the release date could be coming up soon. Google has a sign-up list to receive updates on availability for the $250 life-logging camera.

Hillary K. Grigonis
Hillary never planned on becoming a photographer—and then she was handed a camera at her first writing job and she's been…
The FCC’s latest crackdown could put more than DJI drones at risk in the US
Robot, Person, Face

DJI may have found creative ways to keep some of its products flowing into the US, but those efforts are now drawing increased attention from regulators. According to The Verge, the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has started cracking down on several companies it believes could be helping DJI continue selling products in the country. These businesses have been described by industry observers as "DJI front companies" because they market or import products that appear to be closely tied to the Chinese drone maker while operating under different brand names.

DJI's alleged back door may be closing

Read more
I bought Kodak’s viral keychain camera, and the bad photos are part of its charm
The Kodak Charmera is barely a camera, and I still keep using it
Machine, Wheel, Camera

I bought the Kodak Charmera partly because I wanted a portable digital camera, and partly because I wanted a pretty little collectible. The Charmera is sold as a blind box, so you do not know which version you are getting until the box is opened. There are multiple retro Kodak-style designs, plus a transparent secret edition that looks like the one everyone would want.

I had the shopkeeper pick my box for better luck, and it worked out. I got the yellow variant, which is inspired by Kodak's original 80s disposable camera. The transparent one is definitely the fun collector’s piece, but the yellow model feels like the proper Kodak version. It looks like a tiny toy camera that escaped from a souvenir shop, found a keyring, and now hangs around wherever you go.

Read more
This new $30 keychain camera is coming for Kodak Charmera with a flip screen for selfies
Yashica's new camera makes toy photography more fun
YASHICA Funtastic Keychain Camera in multiple variants

Tiny digital cameras are all the rage, and Yashica is now offering a very cute toy photography experience of its own. The company’s new Funtastic Keychain Camera is exactly what the name suggests, a miniature digital camera small enough to clip onto your keys, bag, or lanyard. The popular Kodak Charmera is the obvious comparison, which brings a tiny blind-box keychain camera that became a viral collectible.

Now, Yashica's version lands in the same novelty-camera lane, but adds one very useful trick, which is a 180-degree flip screen.

Read more