Skip to main content

Lawsuit contends photographing your own ballot shouldn’t land you in jail

lawsuit says ballot photography should be legal 34829318 ml
Baboon / 123RF
Taking a selfie with your ballot in November could mean your next photo is a mugshot, but one lawsuit is working to change that, claiming the ban on polling-place photography is unconstitutional censorship. On Sept. 9, the Pillar of Law Institute filed a lawsuit challenging one state’s ban on polling place photography.

While there isn’t a federal ban on photographing a ballot, several states prohibit the practice entirely, while others allow only empty ballots to be photographed. Michigan is one of the states that prohibit cameras at the polls outright, and the Pillar of Law Institute is working to challenge that with a lawsuit against Secretary of State Ruth Johnson.

Related Videos

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Michigan voter Joel Crookstan, who had no idea taking a selfie with his ballot in 2012 would land him in a heap of legal trouble. In Michigan, photographing your ballot can cause you to forfeit your vote as well as lead to a fine of up to $500 and up to 90 days in jail.

This photo showing a vote for Michigan State University trustees has resulted in a lawsuit questioning the ban on ballot photography
This photo showing a vote for Michigan State University trustees has resulted in a lawsuit questioning the ban on ballot photography Joel Crookston

Michigan is not alone either. New Hampshire is also facing legal battles on a similar front — although a judge struck down the state’s ballot image ban, the state is currently appealing that decision. Several states from California to Maryland have banned ballot photos.

Some only ban filled ballots that show who a person voted for while allowing blank ballots to be photographed, while other states do not allow photography inside the building at all. In states like Indiana, photographing a ballot is a felony, while for other states there’s no penalty in place, even though polling-place photography is discouraged.

“Many voters take ballot selfies and post them to social media sites like Facebook on election day, and it is a powerful form of free speech,” said Stephen Klein, Pillar attorney and lead counsel in the Michigan case. “Instead of just telling people whom they voted for, voters can actually prove whom they voted for — there’s just no other way to do that so convincingly. But the Secretary of State prohibits this. This is not just a case against silly rules; it’s a case against unconstitutional censorship.”

The lawsuit also calls into question the way that general photography is banned, while members of the media are allowed to take photographs inside polling locations. According to the lawsuit, the unequal treatment violates both free speech and equal protection.

While Klein says that the integrity of other voters’ ballots needs to be respected, the current restrictions on polling place photography violate voter’s rights to free speech regarding their own ballots. “Crookston’s lawsuit simply calls for recognition that the photography restrictions need to be narrower and not threaten people with jail time for photographing and publishing their own ballots,” he said.

For now, though, voters may be better off skipping the polling place selfie until the legal challenges are adjudicated.

Editors' Recommendations

Did you register to vote? Chances are good that Facebook played a role
glassdoor best places to work facebook sign feat

Clicktivism has evolved into action.

According to election officials, Facebook has driven "substantial increases" in voter registration numbers the country over, and all it took was a 17-word reminder. Back in September, the social media giant began placing messages atop the News Feeds of users aged 18 and over, urging them to register online.
The message was simple -- “Are you registered to vote? Register now to make sure you have a voice in the election,” the message read. Also attached to the reminder were two links: one to a federal directory of state voter registration websites, and the other inviting users to share that they'd already registered.
For four days, Facebook-ers across the nation saw the call to action, and as the New York Times reports, "at least nine secretaries of state have credited the social network’s voter registration reminder ... with boosting sign-ups, in some cases by considerable amounts."

Read more
Selfie snappers, the ‘ballot selfie’ ban in New Hampshire is no more
electionland google trends map 2016 election polling issues voting ballot box registration elections voter turnout curtain fe

Selfie addicts in New Hampshire, all is OK. Your November 8 ballot selfie will not get you into trouble with the authorities.

A federal appeals court on Wednesday upheld a lower court ruling that the state's ban on voters snapping photos of their ballot and sharing them on social media is unconstitutional.

Read more
You won’t go to jail for sharing your Netflix password — just don’t sell it
netflix adds picture in ipad sign

If you've been quietly freaking out because you told your cousin and one of his friends your Netflix password, take a breath. You're probably OK, as long as no one is selling it or renting it, regardless of a recent decision in federal court, as reported by Slate. Netflix subsequently told Business Insider, “As long as they aren’t selling them, members can use their passwords however they please.”

The July 5 decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco was for a specific case regarding an event in 2004. While it does pertain to the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), the case was about a company employee named David Nosal who worked for executive search firm Korn/Ferry. He left and then had two other Korn/Ferry employees download proprietary information for him. A third Korn/Ferry employee let others use her login info to access company information. Not quite like letting Aunt Phyllis use your password to watch Mad Men, right?

Read more