Skip to main content

This drone-photo firm just paid a massive fine over alleged illegal flights

nasa drones annoying sound apple maps drone city
A Chicago-based company that specializes in aerial photography using drones has agreed to pay a $200,000 penalty to settle a case brought by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which had accused it of violating aviation regulations. The figure was a significant reduction on the colossal $1.9 million the FAA had originally proposed.

The company, SkyPan, will also have to hand over an additional $150,000 if it breaks FAA rules in the next year, and another $150,000 if it fails to comply with the terms of the settlement agreement.

Related Videos

The flights at the center of the dispute took place over Chicago and New York City between 2012 and 2014.

In a statement released on Tuesday, SkyPan pointed out that it neither admitted to, or contested, the allegations that the flights were contrary to FAA regulations, and that it wished “to resolve this matter without any further expense or delay of business.” It added that “in exchange, the FAA makes no finding of violation.”

SkyPan has nearly 30 years of experience in the aerial photography business and offers clients footage using various flight systems, drones among them.

In its 2015 case against SkyPan, the FAA claimed SkyPan’s offending flights – 65 in all – took place “in some of our most congested airspace and heavily populated cities, violating airspace regulations and various operating rules,” adding, “These operations were illegal and not without risk.”

Of the alleged incursions, 43 took place in the highly restricted New York Class B airspace – usually areas close to busy airports – without receiving clearance to access it, the FAA said in its filing.

It also claimed that SkyPan’s drones were flying without using the necessary equipment, such as a two-way radio, transponder, and altitude-reporting device.

Commenting on the case at the time, FAA administrator Michael Huerta said, “Flying unmanned aircraft in violation of the Federal Aviation Regulations is illegal and can be dangerous.” He continued, “We have the safest airspace in the world, and everyone who uses it must understand and observe our comprehensive set of rules and regulations.”

In its Tuesday statement, SkyPan said the flights in question took place two years before the FAA’s first rule for commercial unmanned flying operations was enacted, adding that it’s never had an accident in all the time it’s been operating, and that it’s “never compromised citizens’ privacy or security.”

Part of the settlement also means SkyPan will work with the FAA on creating three public service announcements over the next year that’ll encourage drone operators to learn and comply with relevant regulations.

Editors' Recommendations

Facebook could pay another multibillion-dollar fine over facial recognition
Mark Zuckerberg Tagged

Facebook could have to pay yet another multibillion-dollar fine after losing an appeals court decision on Thursday regarding the company’s use of facial recognition data. 

The 3-0 decision against the social media giant in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals was over a 2015 class action lawsuit that claimed the company violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, according to court documents.

Read more
CBS, NBC, ABC, and Fox sue Locast, a free, nonprofit TV streaming service
directv now channel list pricing release date watching tv remote

Do you remember Aereo, a plucky little startup from New York City headed by Barry Diller? Aereo wanted to take local, over-the-air broadcasts from major networks, and redistribute them over the internet for a buck a day, or $80 a year. It was a pretty cool idea, except Aereo and Diller never actually got permission from the broadcasters to do it. That small detail ended up costing the company dearly as it was dragged through the legal system all the way up to the Supreme Court -- which ultimately ruled that Aereo had illegally violated the broadcasters' copyrights. Shortly after this loss, Aereo shut down. Now it seems a similar enterprise called Locast (also an NYC operation) is about to face the same difficulties. Locast is being sued by all four major broadcasters, according to Reuters.

There are a few differences this time around, however. Locast, unlike Aereo, is a nonprofit and does not charge viewers any money to watch its service. It does accept donations through its website. But regardless of its profit motive, it ultimately has the same negative effect on broadcasters' bottom lines. Because companies like ABC and CBS typically charge cable and satellite operators a "carriage fee" for redistributing their programming, they fear that Locast will erode this revenue stream because it doesn't pay the broadcasters any money. Locast claims to cover 31% of the U.S. market or over 34 million homes.

Read more
British Airways hit with a massive fine for 2018 data breach
british airways cabin crew given ipads

A data breach in 2018 that saw hackers steal personal data belonging to hundreds of thousands of British Airways customers has cost the company nearly 184 million British pounds (about $230 million), making it the biggest fine ever imposed for an incident of this kind.

The U.K.’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) said it handed down the fine for breaches of data protection law that it said resulted from “poor security arrangements” at the company.

Read more