Skip to main content

Airbnb fights for New York host against unclear ‘illegal hotels law’

Screen Shot 2013-05-21 at 11.10.17 AM

We initially reported that renting out your space in bustling New York City for those seeking short-term accommodations is being interpreted as illegal – a man named Nigel Warren had to learn the hard way when he was asked to pay $2,400 for offering his space on popular travel accommodation site Airbnb. Originally Airbnb wasn’t heavily involved in Warren’s case, but now the company is willing to back the fined host with funding and a litigation team.

David Hantman, Airbnb’s Head of Global Public Policy, confirmed their support for Warren in a blog post, stating that they are determined to fight the ruling until justice is served. “In 2010, the State of New York passed a law designed to crack down on bad actors that operate illegal hotels – a goal we all share. Unfortunately, the 2010 law also had the unintended consequence of impacting regular New Yorkers,” Hantman explains. “The New York law needs to be clarified and should be made more fair for regular New Yorkers who occasionally rent out their own homes to help make ends meet.”

Recommended Videos

The post also makes clear that although they have decided to aid Warren’s extenuating cause, it cannot realistically provide individual assistance to every Airbnb host that encounters a mishap – it’s still up to the user to ascertain the legalities of property rentals in their own locale. Airbnb has available accommodations in over 34,000 cities and 192 countries – that’s too many possible law loopholes for the company to cover personally, and the reason why they leave it up to the hosts to verify their own city laws and leases.

According to Hantman, “recent legislation introduced in the New York State Assembly and the New York State Senate to exempt from the 2010 law those individuals who are renting out their own homes” is truly a great sign, especially since New York is one of their more popular and prized vacation destinations. This is not the end of the battle though, as there are other pressing matters to worry about, such as the amount of flack Airbnb is getting in San Francisco, where the company is based. However, the company’s involvement in Warren’s case and the positive response they seem to be getting has emboldened their pursuit to continue being a reliable resource of many homes-away-from-homes.

“We are committed to clearing the path as best we can for our hosts and the travelers who visit them,” says Hantman. “We will continue to fight Nigel’s ruling, and we continue to fight for a fairer, clearer New York law. The sharing economy is here to stay, and so are we.”

Jam Kotenko
When she's not busy watching movies and TV shows or traveling to new places, Jam is probably on Facebook. Or Twitter. Or…
Bluesky finally adds a feature many had been waiting for
A blue sky with clouds.

Bluesky has been making a lot of progress in recent months by simplifying the process to sign up while at the same time rolling out a steady stream of new features.

As part of those continuing efforts, the social media app has just announced that users can now send direct messages (DMs).

Read more
Reddit just achieved something for the first time in its 20-year history
The Reddit logo.

Reddit’s on a roll. The social media platform has just turned a profit for the first time in its 20-year history, and now boasts a record 97.2 million daily active users, marking a year-over-year increase of 47%. A few times during the quarter, the figure topped 100 million, which Reddit CEO and co-founder Steve Huffman said in a letter to shareholders had been a “long-standing milestone” for the site.

The company, which went public in March, announced the news in its third-quarter earnings results on Tuesday.

Read more
Worried about the TikTok ban? This is how it might look on your phone
TikTok splash screen on an Android phone.

The US Supreme Court has decided to uphold a law that would see TikTok banned in the country on January 19. Now, the platform has issued an official statement, confirming that it will indeed shut down unless it gets some emergency relief from the outgoing president.

“Unless the Biden Administration immediately provides a definitive statement to satisfy the most critical service providers assuring non-enforcement, unfortunately TikTok will be forced to go dark on January 19,” said the company soon after the court’s verdict.
So, what does going dark mean?
So, far, there is no official statement on what exactly TikTok means by “going dark.” There is a lot of speculation out there on how exactly the app or website will look once TikTok shutters in the US.

Read more