Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Dating apps Tinder and Grindr linked to a surge in crimes in the UK

Add as a preferred source on Google

Alarming figures released by authorities in the U.K. reveal that crimes linked to dating apps are on the rise, increasing more than sevenfold in the past two years.

The statistics were compiled from reports from 30 police forces across England and Wales, following a request from the Press Association under the Freedom of Information Act.

Recommended Videos

The numbers show a sharp increase from 55 incidents of crimes that mentioned Tinder or Grindr in 2013, to 412 in the year to October 2015. Among the reported crimes were cases including rape, grooming, and attempted murder.

Tinder, being the more popular app, appeared on more crime reports than its gay-oriented counterpart, Grindr. The former was mentioned in relation to 277 reports of crime, up from just 21 in 2013. Grindr appeared on 135 crime reports last year, up from 34 in 2013.

Both dating platforms downplayed the figures in comparison to their overall user numbers, but urged users take steps to protect themselves, reports the BBC.

“Tinder has become one of the largest social platforms in the world, responsible for 10 billion connections in just the last few years, and therefore we are not immune to this, despite the fact that it represents a miniscule percentage of our experiences,” stated a Tinder spokesperson.

The numbers also seem small when compared to overall crime reports concerning rapes (29,265), and other sexual offences (58,964) in England and Wales.

“There are many ways to verify and take steps to protect yourself, from meeting in more public spaces to getting phone numbers and speaking beforehand,” said a Grindr spokesperson.

U.K. authorities, however, are treating the figures with the utmost urgency. “The rising popularity of online dating apps and websites has contributed to an increase in the number of recorded crimes,” Deputy Chief Constable Andy Cooke told the BBC.

“Those who use online dating apps [should] be as security conscious as possible … not to share personal data with anyone until they are sure about those they are communicating with.”

Saqib Shah
Saqib Shah is a Twitter addict and film fan with an obsessive interest in pop culture trends. In his spare time he can be…
X’s creator payouts are changing, and original content is the new currency
The platform is replacing Revenue Sharing with a program designed to reward creators who actually make something.
X Twitter on iPhone

X is changing the rules for creators yet again. This time, the platform wants to put less emphasis on simply generating engagement and more on actually making something original. X is replacing its controversial Creator Revenue Sharing program with a new initiative called Original Content Rewards, which will officially launch on September 8, 2026. The existing Revenue Sharing program will continue paying participating creators through September 7, after which the new system takes over.

X wants to reward creators, not engagement farmers

Read more
Snapchat’s Spotlight algorithm now favors human-made videos over AI-generated ones
Snapchat is taking a firm stance against AI slop.
Snapchat-App-Store-open-on-iPhone

If you've been uploading fully AI-generated videos on Snapchat in hopes of earning rewards, it might be time to rethink your strategy. Snapchat has announced changes to Spotlight that prioritize authentic, original creativity over content created entirely by artificial intelligence. The company says its recommendation system will now favor videos made by real creators, while fully AI-generated submissions will no longer qualify for monetization.

So what's changing on Spotlight?

Read more
LinkedIn is crowdsourcing its fight against AI slop
The company is rolling out a new button that lets you flag posts that seem AI generated.
LinkedIn seems like AI slop button

LinkedIn has a serious AI slop problem, and it's now turning to its own users to help fix it. The platform is rolling out a new button that lets users flag posts they suspect were generated by AI. It plans to use that feedback to fine-tune the system that decides how much reach a post gets outside a user's own network, based on how AI-generated it appears.

The announcement comes shortly after an analysis by Pangram found that more than forty percent of long-form LinkedIn posts are fully AI-generated, and it suggests that the reach-trimming measures the company rolled out earlier this year haven't been enough on their own.

Read more