Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Legacy Archives

Facebook beats restraining order, but Timeline delayed

Add as a preferred source on Google
facebook-timeline
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Last week, Facebook was sued by Timelines Inc. for trademark infringement after Facebook made its announcement about the new Timeline feature for profiles. The company is arguing that Facebook’s use of the Timeline name will eventually put Timelines Inc. out of business. Representatives for Timelines Inc. requested a a restraining order against the launch of Facebook Timeline in hopes that a judge would agree that the “Timelines” trademark is valid. However, Judge Edmond E. Chang of Chicago did not grant the restraining order for the company. The judge did request that Facebook keep the court informed as to how many users have access to Facebook Timeline.

timelines-shotAs of this week, a bit over one million users are already accessing Facebook Timeline. While likely developers, many curious users simply registered as a developer in order to gain early access to the new design. The original date for a wider launch of Facebook Timeline was supposed to occur on September 29, but Facebook has pushed it forward to October 6 for reasons related to this lawsuit or technical glitches. After the initial announcement of Facebook Timeline, anyone that searched for the Timelines Inc. fan page were redirected to the main page for Facebook Timeline. Facebook has corrected this oversight and the Timelines Inc. fan page can now be found through Facebook’s search function.

Recommended Videos

While the court case between Facebook and Timelines Inc. is still pending while waiting on the official judge, public opinion on the Timelines Inc. fan page has been consistently negative since the attempted restraining order. Representatives for the Timelines Inc. fan page only recently started posting content on the page as of October 1. The last official post from the company previous to that was made on June 15. Negative comments from fans of the page have be focused on greed, fame and the design of the Timelines.com home page.

Mike Flacy
By day, I'm the content and social media manager for High-Def Digest, Steve's Digicams and The CheckOut on Ben's Bargains…
Topics
X’s creator payouts are changing, and original content is the new currency
The platform is replacing Revenue Sharing with a program designed to reward creators who actually make something.
X Twitter on iPhone

X is changing the rules for creators yet again. This time, the platform wants to put less emphasis on simply generating engagement and more on actually making something original. X is replacing its controversial Creator Revenue Sharing program with a new initiative called Original Content Rewards, which will officially launch on September 8, 2026. The existing Revenue Sharing program will continue paying participating creators through September 7, after which the new system takes over.

X wants to reward creators, not engagement farmers

Read more
Snapchat’s Spotlight algorithm now favors human-made videos over AI-generated ones
Snapchat is taking a firm stance against AI slop.
Snapchat-App-Store-open-on-iPhone

If you've been uploading fully AI-generated videos on Snapchat in hopes of earning rewards, it might be time to rethink your strategy. Snapchat has announced changes to Spotlight that prioritize authentic, original creativity over content created entirely by artificial intelligence. The company says its recommendation system will now favor videos made by real creators, while fully AI-generated submissions will no longer qualify for monetization.

So what's changing on Spotlight?

Read more
LinkedIn is crowdsourcing its fight against AI slop
The company is rolling out a new button that lets you flag posts that seem AI generated.
LinkedIn seems like AI slop button

LinkedIn has a serious AI slop problem, and it's now turning to its own users to help fix it. The platform is rolling out a new button that lets users flag posts they suspect were generated by AI. It plans to use that feedback to fine-tune the system that decides how much reach a post gets outside a user's own network, based on how AI-generated it appears.

The announcement comes shortly after an analysis by Pangram found that more than forty percent of long-form LinkedIn posts are fully AI-generated, and it suggests that the reach-trimming measures the company rolled out earlier this year haven't been enough on their own.

Read more