Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Legacy Archives

Facebook closes loophole that exposes private photos

Add as a preferred source on Google
facebook eye
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Facebook has disabled parts of it abuse report system that allowed users’ private photos to be viewed by anyone.

The problem, according to a Facebook spokesperson, was due to recent changes to its abuse report system, which allowed any user to flag a number of photos in another user’s album that he or she deemed “inappropriate,” even if the user filing the abuse report was not friends with the user with the private photos.

Recommended Videos

“Earlier today, we discovered a bug in one of our reporting flows that allows people to report multiple instances of inappropriate content simultaneously,” said a Facebook spokesperson, in an email to Digital Trends. “The bug allowed anyone to view a limited number of another user’s most recently uploaded photos irrespective of the privacy settings for these photos.  This was the result of one of our recent code pushes and was live for a limited period of time. Upon discovering the bug, we immediately disabled the system, and will only return functionality once we can confirm the bug has been fixed.”

facebook-zuckerberg-chickenThe loophole was originally uncovered on the forum of BodyBuilding.com, by user ThePoz, a 6-foot 5-inch 205-pounder from Syracuse, New York.

The patch did not come quickly enough for at least one user, however: Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg. Thanks to some security wall-jumping sleuths at Hacker News and Reddit (where the BodyBuilding.com thread was posted and made widely visible), a number of Zuckerberg’s personal photos are now rapidly making their way around the Web.

Prior to its closing, the loophole worked like this: Go to the photos page of a user who is not your friend. Click on the “Report/Block” tab, and select “Inappropriate Profile photo.” After going through a number of pop-up windows, users who select to “Help us take action by selecting additional photos to include with your report,” were then allowed to pick other photos from that user’s albums. A little clever copy/paste of an image’s URL, and voila, private photos for all to see.

This is only the latest privacy flub Facebook has had to deal with since its launch in 2006. Just last week, Facebook settled with the Federal Trade Commission, which had accused the popular social network of engaging in “unfair and deceptive” privacy practices. The terms of the settlement require Facebook to receive explicit consent from users before changing any privacy settings, and to subject itself to independent audits of its privacy system for the next 20 years.

Because of this scrutiny, Facebook was quick to reiterate its commitment to user privacy, and it’s ability to keep private user data safe.

“The privacy of our user’s data is a top priority for us, and we invest lots of resources in protecting our site and the people who use it,” said Facebook’s spokesperson. “We hire the most qualified and highly-skilled engineers and security professionals at Facebook, and with the recent launch of our Security Bug Bounty Program, we continue to work with the industry to identify and resolve legitimate threats to help us keep the site safe and secure for everyone.”

Andrew Couts
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
Social media users in Australia might get freedom from algorithms. I want it for us all.
Big Tech may soon have to give Australians more say over what lands in their feeds.
iPhone showing social media apps

Australians might soon get to hit the off switch on the algorithm running their social media feed. According to a BBC report, draft legislation set to land this week would force platforms to hand users that choice, and honestly, I believe every country deserves this option.

Why is the government pushing this now?

Read more
Instagram will limit reach for AI influencers who skip AI-generated label on their profile
Instagram tightens AI influencer disclosure rules with a clearer profile label
instagram-ai-generated-profiles

Instagram just drew a hard line around AI influencers pretending to be real people. The platform is renaming its old AI creator label to AI-generated profile, and this time it comes with penalties too. Accounts featuring a fully AI-generated person will see their reach cut if they skip the label, meaning your feed is about to get a lot more honest about who is actually behind the account.

So what counts as an AI-generated profile?

Read more
Bluesky now has a feature to save you from accidentally going viral. I want it everywhere.
Bluesky now lets users opt out of its algorithmic Discover feed.
Social profile page of Bluesky.

There's a specific kind of dread that comes with posting something small and watching it explode to a million strangers who missed all the context. Thankfully, Bluesky just built an escape hatch to avoid this horror. The platform now lets you opt out of its algorithmic Discover feed, meaning your posts stop getting pushed to people who don't already follow you.

How Bluesky's algorithmic opt-out feature works

Read more