Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Web
  4. News

Facebook employees are rebelling against Zuckerberg’s inaction over Trump

Add as a preferred source on Google
 

Facebook employees typically shy away from criticizing the company publicly, but tensions within the company around the site’s responsibilities have reached a boiling point.

Recommended Videos

In an unusual move, many employees have taken to Twitter to publicly criticize the way Facebook is handling debates around hate speech, freedom of expression, and the moral responsibility of platforms to moderate the content that appears on them.

Workers were incensed by Zuckerberg’s decision not to flag a Trump comment about protests in Minnesota that declared “when the looting starts, the shooting starts,” a phrase infamously used in the 1960s by Miami’s police chief to justify violence against protesters and later uttered by segregationist politician George Wallace.

Twitter said the tweet “glorified violence” and hid it behind a warning; Zuckerberg said Trump’s statement would stand.

By Monday afternoon, some Facebook employees had blacked out their profile pictures on Twitter, or changed them to a Black Lives Matter symbol. Using #TakeAction, the workers called on Zuckerberg to reconsider his stance, saying “We have the opportunity to stand for free expression and actively be involved in the conversation. We can do better.”

“@Facebook’s decision to not act on posts that incite violence against black people fails to keep our community safe,” said Messenger designer Trevor Phillipi. “I’m asking that we revisit this decision and provide more transparency into the process, inclusive of black leadership.”

“We have a responsibility @Facebook to keep people safe,” tweeted Facebook designer Drew Lepp. “We are calling on leadership to reconsider decisions made last week. #TakeAction and reduce harm.”

In response, a Facebook spokesperson told Digital Trends: “We recognize the pain many of our people are feeling right now, especially our Black community.

“We encourage employees to speak openly when they disagree with leadership,” the spokesperson continued. “As we face additional difficult decisions around content ahead, we’ll continue seeking their honest feedback.”

Employees had sounded off earlier in the day as well.

The high-profile critics from inside Facebook include Jason Stirman, who works in research and development at Facebook and wrote, “I don’t know what to do, but I know doing nothing is not acceptable. I’m a FB employee that completely disagrees with Mark’s decision to do nothing about Trump’s recent posts, which clearly incite violence. I’m not alone inside of FB. There isn’t a neutral position on racism.”

Others such as Jason Toff, director of product management at Facebook, echoed that many within the company feel similarly. “I work at Facebook and I am not proud of how we’re showing up,” Toff wrote. “The majority of co-workers I’ve spoken to feel the same way. We are making our voice heard.”

Toff voiced support for Facebook’s competitor Twitter, writing that, “I’m glad to see @Twitter take action,” referring to its blocking of Trump’s tweets promoting violence. “Not taking action is an action in itself.”

Brandon Dail, a user interface engineer at Facebook, was clear in his objections: “Disappointed that, again, I need to call this out: Trump’s glorification of violence on Facebook is disgusting and it should absolutely be flagged or removed from our platforms. I categorically disagree with any policy that does otherwise.”

Dail also emphasized the need for Facebook employees to speak out, saying, “Calling this out is literally the bare minimum employees can do; I understand that being an employee makes me complicit, but I’m doing what I can to voice these concerns internally too. I’m sorry to all the people these policies hurt.”

In response to these kinds of criticisms, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg posted last night that, “I know Facebook needs to do more to support equality and safety for the Black community through our platforms.” He also pledged to donate $10 million to groups working for racial justice. However, this is unlikely to be enough to mollify critics of the site’s policies.

Facebook workers staged a virtual walk-out Monday, with some changing their internal profile photos to Twitter’s logo, according to the New York Times.

Georgina Torbet
Georgina has been the space writer at Digital Trends space writer for six years, covering human space exploration, planetary…
Instagram will limit reach for AI influencers who skip AI-generated label on their profile
Instagram tightens AI influencer disclosure rules with a clearer profile label
instagram-ai-generated-profiles

Instagram just drew a hard line around AI influencers pretending to be real people. The platform is renaming its old AI creator label to AI-generated profile, and this time it comes with penalties too. Accounts featuring a fully AI-generated person will see their reach cut if they skip the label, meaning your feed is about to get a lot more honest about who is actually behind the account.

So what counts as an AI-generated profile?

Read more
Bluesky now has a feature to save you from accidentally going viral. I want it everywhere.
Bluesky now lets users opt out of its algorithmic Discover feed.
Social profile page of Bluesky.

There's a specific kind of dread that comes with posting something small and watching it explode to a million strangers who missed all the context. Thankfully, Bluesky just built an escape hatch to avoid this horror. The platform now lets you opt out of its algorithmic Discover feed, meaning your posts stop getting pushed to people who don't already follow you.

How Bluesky's algorithmic opt-out feature works

Read more
Meta’s new teen restrictions will only apply to users in the US for now
Facebook and Instagram teens are getting new limits on screen time and content
Facebook logo on iPhone

Meta is implementing new restrictions on U.S. teens who use Facebook and Instagram, but the changes could have repercussions far beyond U.S. screens. Meta’s new protections come after a series of settlements relating to allegations that social media sites endanger children, with the company facing as much as $18 billion in expenses.

For now, the new rules will be applied only to U.S. users. The measures include limitations on how long younger users can spend on Meta’s apps and limits on their ability to disable certain safety settings, Bloomberg reported. The company says it will watch the changes and continue discussions with governments elsewhere.

Read more