Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Facebook’s fact-checkers think the platform’s political ads should be vetted

Add as a preferred source on Google

One of Facebook’s outsourced content moderators plans to ask the social network to change its policies regarding political ads to allow them to be fact-checked. 

The fact-checking organization Lead Stories will propose the policy change during a meeting with the tech giant next week, CNN reports. Lead Stories will urge Facebook to start fact-checking political ads by a nonpartisan panel. 

Recommended Videos

“There is an urgent need for a fair method to identify egregiously false political ads in 2020,” Lead Stories co-founder and editor-in-chief Alan Duke told CNN. “Our experience as fact-checkers shows me that too many people are too fast to fall for disinformation.”

Lead Stories is one of six fact-checking organizations that Facebook hired after the 2016 elections when the platform was accused of spreading misinformation through false news articles and sources that were not credible. 

“The goal of the meeting is to get constructive feedback and address questions from our partners. We welcome their input and look forward to the discussion next week,” a Facebook spokesperson told Digital Trends.

According to Facebook’s fact-checking policies, political speech is a part of free expression. 

“Our approach is grounded in Facebook’s fundamental belief in free expression, respect for the democratic process, and the belief that, especially in mature democracies with a free press, political speech is the most scrutinized speech there is,” the policy states. “Just as critically, by limiting political speech we would leave people less informed about what their elected officials are saying and leave politicians less accountable for their words.”

Facebook has been criticized in recent weeks for its refusal to fact-check political ads. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said in a speech at Georgetown University earlier this month that he believes political ads are an essential form of free speech. 

“I believe that people should decide for themselves what is credible, not tech companies,” Zuckerberg said during that speech. 

During a six-hour hearing with Congress last week, Zuckerberg was grilled on his decision for not fact-checking political ads, and many members of Congress pointed out the flaws that the ad policy has. 

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) gave Zuckerberg a hypothetical scenario, asking if she could theoretically run an ad on Facebook targeted at registered Republicans saying that they voted for the Green New Deal since there is no fact-checking for politicians’ ads, to which Zuckerberg replied that he didn’t know off the top of his head. 

“Do you see a problem here with a complete lack of fact-checking on political advertisements?” Ocasio-Cortez asked during the hearing. 

In contrast, Twitter banned political ads from its site entirely, CEO Jack Dorsey announced on Wednesday.

“This isn’t about free expression. This is about paying for reach. And paying to increase the reach of political speech has significant ramifications that today’s democratic infrastructure may not be prepared to handle. It’s worth stepping back in order to address,” Dorsey tweeted. 

Digital Trends reached out to Lead Stories to comment, but we haven’t yet received a response. 

Allison Matyus
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Allison Matyus is a general news reporter at Digital Trends. She covers any and all tech news, including issues around social…
WhatsApp pausing usernames for hundreds of millions of users over fraud fears
WhatsApp’s phone-number privacy feature runs into scrutiny in India
Electronics, Phone, Mobile Phone

WhatsApp’s plan to let people use usernames instead of phone numbers has run into trouble in India, its biggest market. This newly introduced feature is meant to improve privacy by letting users connect without immediately sharing their phone number. Indian authorities, however, are worried that the same feature could make scams and impersonation harder to control.

India's Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has asked WhatsApp to pause the username rollout until consultations with the government are complete. That is a major intervention, since WhatsApp has more than 500 million users in the country, who rely on the app for their everyday personal and professional communications.

Read more
X wants you to go live with its new streaming hub, and is offering $1 million to make it worth your while
Live Studio brings scheduling, audience controls, and real-time analytics to X's Creator Studio, but the platform hasn't said how it plans to split the $1 million among creators.
X Live Studio screengrab

X is making a serious push to become a destination for live video, launching a new tool called Live Studio and pledging $1 million in creator payouts to attract streamers to the platform. Nikita Bier, X's head of product, announced the tool on X with a demo showcasing how it works.

Stream controls, real-time analytics, and a $1 million payout

Read more
Reddit is ending anonymous browsing on old Reddit, and longtime users are not happy
Reddit's old interface is getting a login requirement, and its long term future looks uncertain.
Reddit

If you have been quietly browsing old.reddit.com without logging in, that option is going away. Reddit just announced it will require everyone to log in to use old.reddit.com, with the change landing sometime over the next month. A Reddit admin broke the news on the platform, calling it part of a push to tighten how automated systems get into the site.

Why is Reddit locking down the old interface?

Read more