Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Web
  4. News

Germans granted right to be left alone as court rules FB's Friend Finder illegal

Add as a preferred source on Google

Some of your “friends” don’t want to be found — at least not on Facebook. And now, according to Germany’s highest court, they are entitled to not get inundated by unwanted requests. Earlier this week, the federal court of justice in Germany determined that Facebook’s “friend finder” feature constitutes harassment, upholding decisions previously issued by two lower courts.

Facebook’s “friend finder” extends its influence to beyond the social media platform, essentially crawling your email list and then sending invitations to your friends who are not yet on the social network to create an account. According to German officials, this sort of behavior is “intrusive” and has now been disallowed in the country.

Recommended Videos

The decision cannot come as much of a surprise to Facebook, which, along with a number of other American-based tech companies, has had its fair share of legal battles throughout Europe. With privacy policies across the ocean considerably more stringent than those at home, Facebook, Google, and other firms have had to comply with stricter regulations.

A Facebook spokesperson issued a statement regarding the recent decision, noting that the company would work “to assess any impact on our services” in the country. And as for the Federation of German Consumer Organisations (VZBV), the group that filed the complaint against Friend Finder way back in 2010, its members are curious as to what further implications this ruling may have on other companies.

“What the judgment means exactly for the current Friends Finder, we now have to find out,” said Klaus Mueller, head of the VZBV. “In addition to Facebook, other services use this form of advertising to attract new users. They must now probably rethink,” he added.

 So sure, it may have taken six years to get everything sorted out, but in this latest battle between Facebook and European courts, the Zuck’s empire has fallen short.
Lulu Chang
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
X’s creator payouts are changing, and original content is the new currency
The platform is replacing Revenue Sharing with a program designed to reward creators who actually make something.
X Twitter on iPhone

X is changing the rules for creators yet again. This time, the platform wants to put less emphasis on simply generating engagement and more on actually making something original. X is replacing its controversial Creator Revenue Sharing program with a new initiative called Original Content Rewards, which will officially launch on September 8, 2026. The existing Revenue Sharing program will continue paying participating creators through September 7, after which the new system takes over.

X wants to reward creators, not engagement farmers

Read more
Snapchat’s Spotlight algorithm now favors human-made videos over AI-generated ones
Snapchat is taking a firm stance against AI slop.
Snapchat-App-Store-open-on-iPhone

If you've been uploading fully AI-generated videos on Snapchat in hopes of earning rewards, it might be time to rethink your strategy. Snapchat has announced changes to Spotlight that prioritize authentic, original creativity over content created entirely by artificial intelligence. The company says its recommendation system will now favor videos made by real creators, while fully AI-generated submissions will no longer qualify for monetization.

So what's changing on Spotlight?

Read more
LinkedIn is crowdsourcing its fight against AI slop
The company is rolling out a new button that lets you flag posts that seem AI generated.
LinkedIn seems like AI slop button

LinkedIn has a serious AI slop problem, and it's now turning to its own users to help fix it. The platform is rolling out a new button that lets users flag posts they suspect were generated by AI. It plans to use that feedback to fine-tune the system that decides how much reach a post gets outside a user's own network, based on how AI-generated it appears.

The announcement comes shortly after an analysis by Pangram found that more than forty percent of long-form LinkedIn posts are fully AI-generated, and it suggests that the reach-trimming measures the company rolled out earlier this year haven't been enough on their own.

Read more