Skip to main content

Facebook helps courts with jury selection

facebook-jury-dutyPeople have long been using excuses to get out of jury duty that they don’t want to serve — even though it’s their civic obligation. But now you could be doing exactly that without even knowing it — just by posting on Facebook. According to a report by the Wall Street Journal, court officials are increasingly using social networking sites to decide who makes the cut in jury selections.

Prosecutors and lawyers have begun to look at what people post to Twitter, what status updates they “like” on Facebook, or which pictures they post to MySpace, to determine who does (and does not) make it onto a jury, says WSJ. Even what television shows or music a person likes, or what hobbies they have, play into the decision.

These details, these legal experts say, help determine where a potential juror’s biases lie — and, in turn, which side with whom that person might sympathize. For instance, if you post pro-marijuana sentiments, you’re unlikely to be picked for a case against a drug dealer.

Those tasked with jury selection say using social networking sites to learn about potential jurors has improved the selection system since actual face-time with jury candidates, when lawyers are allowed to ask probing questions, is highly limited. By looking at a person’s online profiles, lawyers are able to get a better glimpse of who people really are.

Others say, however, that what someone posts on their Facebook Wall isn’t indicative of what a person genuinely thinks or believes. Instead, it’s what they want to make people think they believe.

“I don’t think we should abandon that system in favor of Internet snooping,” Jason Schultz, co-director of the Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic at the University of California, Berkeley, law school, tells WSJ. “There are a number people who post who they want to be, as opposed to who they are.”

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Andrew Couts
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
European court decides what Facebook can show to the rest of the world
facebook european union defamation remove globally wesley tingey 9z9fxr 7z k unsplash

A case against Facebook’s policies for removing posts in the European Court of Justice could have implications for users around the world. In the ruling published on Thursday, October 3, the court ruled that Facebook must remove content worldwide if the court determines that content to be illegal, despite the fact that different laws may mean that content isn’t illegal everywhere.

The ruling stems from a case of defamation brought by Eva Glawisching-Piesczek, an Austria Greens party chairperson. As politics on the social media platform tend to go, a user shared an article on Facebook with a slew of names. Glawisching-Piesczek requested that Facebook take down the post, which courts in Austria called defamatory, but the network refused.

Read more
Facebook test hides Like counts to help us feel happy, not crappy
facebook housing catalyst front sign headquarters hq offices home fb

A new Facebook test removes "like" counts from News Feed posts in an effort to bring a bit of peace and tranquility to the minds of users. After code uncovered by high-profile app researcher Jane Manchun Wong suggested the network was considering the change earlier this month, Facebook began rolling out a like-count-free test to users in Australia on Thursday, September 26.

Facebook-owned Instagram is already hiding like counts for some users in a trial spanning seven countries, among them Canada, Australia, and Ireland. Discussing the idea a few months ago, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said he wants people to be "less interested in how many likes a post gets, and focus more on connecting with other people.”

Read more
Justice Department piles on with its own antitrust investigation of Facebook
Facebook-CEO-Mark-Zuckerberg

Facebook is facing yet another federal probe, this time from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) for possibly violating antitrust laws. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently opened a separate antitrust investigation as well. 

Bloomberg reports that the two federal agencies are looking into whether Facebook has violated antitrust laws by harming competition. U.S. Attorney General William Barr urged the DOJ to investigate separately from the FTC. 

Read more