Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Legacy Archives

Facebook pays researcher $12.5K bounty for uncovering image-deletion security flaw

Add as a preferred source on Google

Arul Kumar isn’t the first person to be paid for spotting a security flaw in a widely used online service, and he certainly won’t be the last.

The 21-year-old electronics and communication engineer revealed this week that Facebook paid him $12,500 for spotting a software vulnerability that could allow a hacker to delete any image stored on the social networking site. While the company is known to pay out for discoveries like this, such a large amount is thought to be rare, meaning Facebook’s security team considered it to be potentially very damaging.

Recommended Videos

Ethical hacker

Kumar, who on his blog describes himself as someone “with a passion in ethical hacking”, discovered that the bug existed with all versions of all browsers for both PC and mobile. The engineer explained on his blog that he found the flaw by going through Facebook’s Support Dashboard, which is used for sending photo removal requests to company staff.

Such requests can also be sent direct to the person who uploaded the image via the photo removal request form. The uploader receives a link, which, if clicked, removes the image.

However, Kumar found a way for a hacker to generate a photo removal link and have it sent to their own inbox, thereby allowing them to delete the image without the uploader knowing.

After bringing the bug to the attention of Facebook via its Bug Bounty program, the company’s security team agreed to pay out $12,500 for his effort.

facebook flaw
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The program didn’t quite work in the intended way for Palestinian IT researcher Khalil Shreateh, however, when his initial bug report was essentially ignored by Facebook’s security team. Frustrated, Shreateh hacked CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s wall to demonstrate the flaw. Not surprisingly, the security team then took a greater interest in the bug, though said they couldn’t pay Shreateh as he’d violated the site’s terms of service by exploiting the vulnerability. Fortunately for the IT researcher, however, the story has a happy ending.

Bugs for cash

Payouts to independent researchers for bug discoveries has been going on for a while. According to PC World, Web giant Google has paid out around $580,000 over the last three years to independent security researchers who’ve pointed out security vulnerabilities among its online tools, while Mozilla has handed over a similarly large sum, $570,000. However, their respective methods of payment differ – whereas Mozilla pays a flat sum of $3,000 to those who spot a flaw, Google pays an amount anywhere between $500 and $10,000 depending on how serious it considers the bug to be.

Google also organizes the Pwnium browser penetration contest where participants can win up to $150,000 for spotting major Chrome bugs, while the annual Pwn2Own contest also offers payments to hackers who uncover security weaknesses in popular software and mobile devices.

[via Cnet]

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Topics
X’s creator payouts are changing, and original content is the new currency
The platform is replacing Revenue Sharing with a program designed to reward creators who actually make something.
X Twitter on iPhone

X is changing the rules for creators yet again. This time, the platform wants to put less emphasis on simply generating engagement and more on actually making something original. X is replacing its controversial Creator Revenue Sharing program with a new initiative called Original Content Rewards, which will officially launch on September 8, 2026. The existing Revenue Sharing program will continue paying participating creators through September 7, after which the new system takes over.

X wants to reward creators, not engagement farmers

Read more
Snapchat’s Spotlight algorithm now favors human-made videos over AI-generated ones
Snapchat is taking a firm stance against AI slop.
Snapchat-App-Store-open-on-iPhone

If you've been uploading fully AI-generated videos on Snapchat in hopes of earning rewards, it might be time to rethink your strategy. Snapchat has announced changes to Spotlight that prioritize authentic, original creativity over content created entirely by artificial intelligence. The company says its recommendation system will now favor videos made by real creators, while fully AI-generated submissions will no longer qualify for monetization.

So what's changing on Spotlight?

Read more
LinkedIn is crowdsourcing its fight against AI slop
The company is rolling out a new button that lets you flag posts that seem AI generated.
LinkedIn seems like AI slop button

LinkedIn has a serious AI slop problem, and it's now turning to its own users to help fix it. The platform is rolling out a new button that lets users flag posts they suspect were generated by AI. It plans to use that feedback to fine-tune the system that decides how much reach a post gets outside a user's own network, based on how AI-generated it appears.

The announcement comes shortly after an analysis by Pangram found that more than forty percent of long-form LinkedIn posts are fully AI-generated, and it suggests that the reach-trimming measures the company rolled out earlier this year haven't been enough on their own.

Read more